Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Academic media ranking and the configurations of values in higher education: a sociotechnical history of a co-production in France between the media, state and higher education (1976–1989)

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Before the 2000s and the buzz surrounding global rankings, many countries witnessed the emergence and development, starting in the 1970s, of academic media rankings produced primarily by press organisations. This domestic, media-based production, despite the relative lack of attention paid by the social sciences, has been progressively integrated into the functioning of higher education institutions. Examining the emergence and production of academic media rankings in two French magazines between 1976 and 1989, this paper analyses how the media has become a legitimate producer of academic rankings. A micro, sociotechnical history of this production, inspired by the theory of academic capitalism, by communication and media studies and by valuation studies, highlights three principal ideas: First, the production of academic media rankings in France relies on the ability of media organisations to involve the state and the academic institutions themselves. Second, a multidimensional market is instituted by the production of academic media rankings. Third, the concept of “configuration of values” is proposed, with three configurations identified: the configuration of value of opinion, the configuration of value of productivity and the configuration of value of activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Aghulon, C. (2006). La mesure en éducation, un outil au service du politique. L’exemple de la production française. o.s.p. L’orientation scolaire et professionnelle, 35(3), 315–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barats, C. (2015). Médiatisation du “classement de Shanghai” et processus de co-construction : analyse socio-discursive d’un corpus de presse et entretiens compréhensifs. In J. Bouchard, E. Candel, H. Cardy, & G. Gomez-Méjia (Eds.), La médiatisation de l’évaluation/Evaluation in the Media (pp. 215–235). Berne: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, C. H., & Davidson, R. (1997). Ranking Canadian universities: a case of controversy. Tert Educ Manag, 3(1), 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisnier-Bardou, S., & Pailliart, I. (2012). Information publique : stratégies de production, dispositifs de diffusion et usages sociaux. Les enjeux de l’information et de la communication, 13(2), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, J. (2012). La fabrique d’un classement médiatique de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche. L’évaluation de la recherche : pour une réouverture des controverses Quaderni, 77, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, J. (2013). La valorisation des classements par les universités parisiennes. Hermès, 66, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, J. (2015). La médiatisation de l’évaluation et les flux de valeurs/Evaluation in the Media and the Circulation of Values. In J. Bouchard, E. Candel, H. Cardy, & G. Gomez-Méjia (Eds.), La médiatisation de l’évaluation/evaluation in the media (pp. 1–23). Berne: Peter Lang.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brennen, B. (2012). Qualitative research methods for media studies. London New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun, H. (2016). The qualitative interview in media production studies. In C. Paterson et al. (Eds.), Advancing media production research. London: Palgrave Macmilan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrolié, S. (2013). La double vente du journal quotidian. In F. Vatin (Ed.), Évaluer et valoriser. Une sociologie économique de la mesure. Toulouse: Presses universitaires du Mirail.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., et al. (2013). Sociologie des agencements marchands. Paris: Presses des Mines.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Candel, É., Jeanne-Perrier, V., & Souchier, É. (2012). Petites formes, grands desseins. D’une grammaire des énoncés éditoriaux à la standardisation des écritures. In J. Davallon (Ed.), L’économie des écritures sur le web, volume 1 : Traces d’usage dans un corpus de sites de tourisme (pp. 165–201). Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon, J. M. (2002). La presse des jeunes. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon, J.-M. (2008). La presse magazine. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochoy, F. (2002). Une sociologie du packaging ou l’âne de Buridan face au marché. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochoy, F., Trompette, P., & Araujo, L. (2016). From market agencements to market agencing: an introduction. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crémieux-Brilhac, J. L. (1995). Le mouvement pour l’expansion de la recherche scientifique, 1954–1968. In J. L. Crémieux-Brilhac & J. F. Picard (Eds.), Henri Laugier en son siècle (pp. 123–138). Paris: CNRS éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danvers, F. (1988). Pour une histoire de l’orientation professionnelle. Histoire de l’éducation, 37, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danvers, F. (2009). Le conseil en orientation à l’université : un enjeu pour l’insertion professionnelle des étudiants. Perspective socio-historique. In V. Bedin (Ed.), L’évaluation à l’université. Évaluer ou conseiller (pp. 157–174). Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. (1967). La société du spectacle. Buchet-Chastel.

  • Dérouet, J.-L., & Normand, R. (2011). L’université française, entre crise et refondation. Vers un nouveau régime académique ? Artigos, 32, 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (2008). Refléter ou instituer : l’invention des indicateurs statistiques. In A. Desrosières (Ed.), Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification (pp. 187–203). Paris: Presses des Mines.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1991). Qu’est-ce que la sociologie? La Tour d’Aigues: Editions de l’Aube.

  • Elken, M., Hovdhaughen, E. & Stensaker, B. (2016). Global rankings in the Nordic region: challenging the identity of research-intensive universities? Higher Education, January, 1–15.

  • Espeland, W. (2015). Rankled by rankings: how media rankings redefined higher education. In J. Bouchard, E. Candel, H. Cardy, & G. Gomez-Méjia (Eds.), La médiatisation de l’évaluation/evaluation in the media (pp. 25–37). Berne: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W. (2016). Reverse engineering and emotional attachments as mechanisms mediating the effects of quantification. Historical Social Research, 41(2), 280–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds. Am J Sociol, 1(113), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federkeil, G., van Vught, F., & Westerheijden, D. (2012). An evaluation and critique of current rankings. In F. van Vught & F. Ziegele (Eds.), Multidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-Multirank. Higher education dynamics, 37 (pp. 39–70). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Forestier, Y. (2015). L’école : entre choix techniques et enjeux identitaires : la construction ambiguë d’un objet médiatique (1959–2008). Le temps des medias, 24, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardey, D. (2008). Écrire, calculer, classer. Comment une révolution de papier a transformé les sociétés contemporaines (1800–1940). Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world-class excellence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Helgesson, C.-F., & Munesia, F. (2013). For what it’s worth: an introduction to valuation studies. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpik, L. (2007). L’Économie des singularités. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, R., & Neveu, E. (Eds.). (2007). Political journalism: new challenges, new practices. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1989). La science en action. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilti, A. (2014). Figures publiques. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2014). University ranking and social science. Eur J Educ, 49(1), 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A. (2015). Pour une analyse de classe de la communication. In F. Granjon & M. Senecal (Eds.), Communication, idéologies et hégémonies culturelles. Paris: Presses des Mines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignot-Gérard, S., & Sarfati, F. (2015). Dispositif de jugement sur la qualité ou instrument de construction de la reputation ? Le cas d’un classement universitaire. Terrains et travaux, 26, 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padioleau, J.-G. (1976). Systèmes d’interaction et rhétoriques journalistiques. Sociologie du travail, 3, 256–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, X. (2014). Les statisticiens du Ministère de l’éducation nationale : évolution d’un métier d’État. Histoire de l’éducation, 140–141, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2013). La manufacture de l’évaluation bibliométrique. Algorithmes, jeux de données et outils bibliométriques. Réseaux, 1(177), 23–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University ranking in critical perspective. J High Educ, 84(4), 544–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauhvargers, A. (2011). Global university rankings and their impacts. Eua Report on Rankings 2011.

  • Roessler, I. (2013). What happened? What remains? What’s to come? 15 years of ranking experience. Arbeitspaper, 168, Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung.

  • Rollot, O. (2016). La communication dans les établissements d’enseignement supérieur. Headway Report.

  • Salmi, J., & Saroyan, A. (2007). Les palmarès d’universités comme moyen d’action : usages et abus. Politiques et gestion de l’enseignement supérieur, 2(19), 33–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (2014). Retheorizing academic capitalism: actors, mechanisms, fields and networks. In B. Cantwell & I. Kaupinnen (Eds.), Academic capitalism in the age of globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2012). Transatlantic moves to the markets: the United States and the European Union. High Educ, 63, 583–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vught, F., & Westerheijden, D. (2012). Impact of rankings. In F. van Vught & F. Ziegele (Eds.), Multidimensional ranking: the design and development of U-Multirank. Higher education dynamics. 37 (pp. 71–84). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcellos, M. (2006). L’enseignement supérieur en France. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veroone, B. (2015). La construction à tâtons de l’action publique européenne en faveur du classement des universities U-Multirank. Éducation et sociétés, 2(36), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1992). Le premier des sujets. Réseaux, 10(51), 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Johannes Angermuller, Wendy Espeland, Tilman Reitz and Jens Maesse for their attentive reading and precious suggestions. And many thanks to Chris Leentjes for his copyedit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Paris 13—LabSic, Villetaneuse, France

    Julie Bouchard

Authors
  1. Julie Bouchard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Bouchard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouchard, J. Academic media ranking and the configurations of values in higher education: a sociotechnical history of a co-production in France between the media, state and higher education (1976–1989). High Educ 73, 947–962 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0121-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0121-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation