Abstract
This article questions what kind of actors become involved and analyzes what forms of knowledge are activated, when discourses such as “research-based” and “profession-oriented” become basic preconditions in national curriculum change processes in Norway. A “mapping” is conducted, comprised of actors and ideas, played out in two national curriculum change processes in Norway, namely “the Integrated Master Program in Teacher Education” and “the Bachelor Program in Engineering.” The analysis shows that actors and the roles they were able to play may have had an effect on what kind of knowledge forms was prioritized in the curriculum change processes. In both, curriculum process integration of discipline-based/theoretical knowledge and practical and context-specific knowledge are emphasized. However, in the teacher education process, principled knowledge about specific professional problems and theory-based decisions are highlighted as important, while, in the engineering education process, procedural knowledge about how to solve problems and innovative capacity is more emphasized. The analysis shows a relationship between such curriculum change processes and the composite “epistemology” of the wider and contextually developed policy space. It is also demonstrated, in the two cases, that the knowledge base for professional work is subject to negotiations far beyond the academic community and is embedded in a wider set of social, professional, and political institutions and frames.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afdal, H. W. (2012). Constructing knowledge for the teaching profession. A comparative analysis of policy making, curricula content, and novice teachers’ knowledge relations in the cases of Finland and Norway. Dissertation for the Degree of Ph.D., University of Oslo. (No. 161).
Afdal, H. W. (2013a). Knowledge in teacher education curricula–Examining differences between a research-based program and a general professional program. Nordic Studies in Education, 32(03–04), 245–261.
Afdal, H. W. (2013b). Policy making processes with respect to teacher education in Finland and Norway. Higher Education, 65(2), 167–180.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
Bleiklie, I., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2002). Changing knowledge regimes: Universities in a new research environment. Higher Education, 44(3–4), 519–532.
Braun, D. (2008). Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), 227–239.
Bucciarelli, L., & Kuhn, S. (1997). Engineering education and engineering practice: Improving the fit. In S. R. Barley & J. Orr (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in the U.S. settings (pp. 210–229). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The New Teacher Education: For Better or for Worse? Educational researcher, 34(7), 3–17. doi:10.3102/0013189x034007003.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational researcher, 19(2), 2–11.
Considine, M. (2005). Making Public Policy: Institutions, Actors, Strategies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Downey, G. L. (2009). What is engineering studies for? Dominant practices and scalable scholarship 1. Engineering Studies, 1(1), 55–76.
Ensor, P. (2004). Contesting discourses in higher education curriculum restructuring in South Africa. Higher Education, 48(3), 339–359.
Ensor, P. (2006). Curriculum. In N. Cloete, P. Maassen, R. Fehnel, T. Moja, T. Gibbon, & H. Perold (Eds.), Transformation in Higher Education: Global Pressures and Local Realities (pp. 179–193). Dordrecht: Springer.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.
Goedegebuure, L., Kaiser, F., Maassen, P., Meek, L., Vught, F. A. V., & Weert, D. E. (Eds.). (1994). Higher education policy: An international comparative perspective. Oxford: Published for the IAU Press by Pergamon Press.
Gornitzka, Å. (1999). Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education. Higher Education, 38(1), 5–31.
Heitmann, G. (2005). Challenges of engineering education and curriculum development in the context of the Bologna process. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 447–458.
Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2006). Research-based Teacher Education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish Teacher Educators. Helsinki: Finnish Educational Research Association.
Jensen, K., Lahn, L. C., & Nerland, M. (2012). Professional Learning in the Knowledge Society. Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
Jyrhämä, R., Kynäslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Byman, R., Maaranen, K., Toom, A., & Kansanen, P. (2008). The appreciation and realisation of research-based teacher education: Finnish students’ experiences of teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(1), 1–16.
Karseth, B. (2006). Curriculum restructuring in Higher Education after the Bologna Process: A new pedagogic regime? Revista española de educación comparada, 12, 255–284.
Knorr Cetina, K. (2006). Knowledge in Knowledge Society: Five transitions. Knowledge, Work and Society, 4(3), 23–41.
Kogan, M., & Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming Higher Education (Vol. 50). London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (2005). Lov om universiteter og høyskoler (Universitets- og høyskole loven [The Norwegian Higher Education Act] (Vol. LOV-2005-04-01-15). https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2005-04-01-15.
Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (2008–2009). Læreren, rollen og utdanningen [The Teacher, the Role and the Education]. (Stortingsmelding nr. 11 [White Paper No. 11]). Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research].
Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (2013). Nasjonale rettningslinjer for lektorutdanning for trinn 8–13 [National Guidelines for Integrated Secondary School Teacher Education Programmes for Years 8–13]. http://uit.no/Content/306735/Nasjonale%20retningslinjer%20LU%208-13.pdf. Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research].
Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–145.
Maaranen, K. (2009). Widening perspectives of teacher education. Studies on theory-practice relationship, reflection, research and professional development. Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki. (Research Report 305).
Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2), 2–16.
Muller, J. (2009). Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Journal of Education and work, 22(3), 205–226.
Munthe, E., & Haug, P. (2010). En integrert, profesjonsrettet og forskningsbasert grunnskolelærerutdanning [An integrated, profession-oriented and research-based teacher education]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift [Norwegian Journal of Education], 94(03), 188–203.
Munthe, E., & Rogne, M. (2015). Research based teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 46, 17–24.
Nasjonalt råd for lærerutdanning [National Council for Teacher Education]. (2011). En helhetlig tilnærming til lærerutdanning. Rapport fra en arbeidsgruppe nedsatt av Nasjonal råd for lærerutdannig [An Overall Approach to Teacher Education. A Report from the Working Group Established by the National Council for Teacher Education]. Retrieved from http://www.uhr.no/documents/HelhetligEndelig_versjon_september2011.pdf.
NOKUT. (2008). Evaluering av ingeniørutdanning 2006–2008. Del 1. Hovedrapport [Evaluation of Norwegian engineering programs 2006–2008. Part 1. Main report]. Retrieved from NOKUT: http://www.nokut.no/Documents/NOKUT/Artikkelbibliotek/Norsk_utdanning/Evaluering/INGEVA/Rapporter/INGEVA_NOKUT_%20del%201%20Hovedrapport.pdf.
Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–135.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.
Scott, G., & Yates, K. W. (2002). Using successful graduates to improve the quality of undergraduate engineering programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(4), 363–378.
Toom, A., Krokfors, L., Kynäslahti, H., Stenberg, K., Maaranen, K., Jyrhämä, R., Kansanen, P. (2008). Exploring the essential characteristics of research-based teacher education from the viewpoint of teacher educators. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/242592694_Exploring_the_essential_characteristics_of_research-based_teacher_education_from_the_viewpoint_of_teacher_educators Retrieved 15th of August 2014.
Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 265–285.
Westbury, I., Hansén, S. E., Kansanen, P., & Björkvist, O. (2005). Teacher education for research based practice in expanded roles: Finland’s experience. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 49(5), 475–485.
Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 34(3), 3–9.
Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. W. (2002). Impact of undergraduate research experience in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Afdal, H.W. “Research-based” and “profession-oriented” as prominent knowledge discourses in curriculum restructuring of professional programs. High Educ 74, 401–418 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9998-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9998-7