Abstract
Engaged learning opportunities have become powerful foundations upon which students build lifelong skills and organizational capacities. Research has empirically validated the long-term positive learning impacts of active and experiential learning opportunities for students. As such, institutional administrators and external stakeholders have encouraged and, in some cases, required that faculty use engaged teaching methods. At the same time, difficult economic circumstances continue to batter higher education, with class sizes increasing to improve efficiencies and reduce instructional costs. The confluence of those two trends has resulted in calls to integrate engaged learning opportunities in large higher education classes, engendering special challenges for educators. It is within this particular gap—practical guidance for transforming passive course designs to active ones—that our article contributes to the international higher education literature. We share our experiences implementing engaged learning practices into large university classes over a 4-year period, guided by an experiential learning theoretical framework. By analyzing text from our individual teaching journals and collaborative post-mortems, we are able to introduce an integrative model highlighting important contextual and logistical issues that must be considered: pre-class planning, in-class facilitation, assessments and feedback, training and renorming student expectations, and institutional context. We end the article with caveats and ethical considerations when introducing engaged learning into large classes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
Throughout the article, we will generally use “engaged” teaching and learning as the umbrella term under which other descriptors such as experiential, relational, collaborative, and active learning techniques fall, following the standard language of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) research work.
The term “lecturer” refers to the academic staff member primarily responsible for delivering the course and equates to an American professor. For the purpose of simplicity, we use the term professor throughout the article.
References
Allais, S. (2014). A critical perspective on large class teaching: the political economy of massification and the sociology of knowledge. High Educ, 67(6), 721–734.
Arvanitakis, J. (2014). Massification and the large lecture theatre: from panic to excitement. High Educ, 67(6), 735–745.
Axelrod, R. (2015). Union attitudes among students. OBTS-L list post.
Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge: Harvard University press.
Bandiera, O., Larsinese, V., & Rasul, I. (2010). The impact of class size on the performance of university students VOX CEPR’s Policy Portal, (http://www.voxeu.org/article/impact-class-size-performance-university-students),
Benton, S. L., & Pallett, W. H. (2013). Class size matters. Inside Higher Ed, https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/01/29/essay-importance-class-size-higher-education.
Beyer, A. R. (2012). Educators against active learning. Evolution of Academia.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does (4th). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press & McGraw-Hill.
Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1979). A simple—but powerful—power simulation. EXCHANGE The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, 4(3), 38–42.
Bonwell, C. C. (n.d.). Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. https://www.ydae.purdue.edu/lct/HBCU/documents/Active_Learning_Creating_Excitement_in_the_Classroom.pdf
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom, ERIC report ED340272.
Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: lack of training, time, incentives, and tensions with professional identity? CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339–346.
Canadaprof (2015). Reply to “More evidence that active learning trumps lecturing”. In M. Weimer (Ed.), Faculty Focus available at http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professor-blog/more-evidence-that-active-learning-trumps-lecturing/.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). In American Association of Higher Education (Ed.), Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Denver: AAHE Bulletin.
Covill, A. E. (2011). College students’ perceptions of the traditional lecture method. Coll Stud J, 45(1), 92–101.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. J Manag Educ, 28(4), 407–426.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience & education. New York: Collier.
Dyson, B., Vickers, K., Turtle, J., Cowan, S., & Tassone, A. (2015). Evaluating the use of Facebook to increase student engagement and understanding in lecture-based classes. High Educ, 69(2), 303–313.
Exeter, D. J., Ameratunga, S., Ratima, M., Morton, S., Dickson, M., Hsu, D., et al. (2010). Student engagement in very large classes: the teachers’ perspective. Stud High Educ, 35(7), 761–775.
Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26–48.
Foley, A. R., & Masingila, J. O. (2014). Building capacity: challenges and opportunities in large class pedagogy (LCP) in sub-Saharan Africa. High Educ, 67(6), 797–808.
Fornaciari, C. J., & Kauanui, S. (2008). I want to design Ferraris, but I work at Ford: Or, how do I teach experientially in the era of assembly line classrooms. Paper presented at the OBTC Teaching Conference for Management Educators, Boston.
Fornaciari, C. J., & Lund Dean, K. (2005). Experiencing work design: beyond Hackman and Oldham. J Manag Educ, 29(4), 631–653.
Fornaciari, C. J., & Lund Dean, K. (2014). The twenty-first century syllabus: from pedagogy to andragogy. J Manag Educ, 38(5), 701–723.
Gallup & Purdue University (2015). The Gallup-Purdue Index 2015 Report. Purdue University. http://www.gallup.com/services/185924/gallup-purdue-index-2015-report.aspx.
Heaslip, G., Donovan, P., & Cullen, J. G. (2014). Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes. Act Learn High Educ, 15(1), 11–24.
Heppner, F. (2007). Teaching the large college class: a guidebook for instructors with multitudes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hockings, C. (2009). Reaching the students that student-centred learning cannot reach. Br Educ Res J, 35(1), 83–98.
Hornsby, D. J., & Osman, R. (2014). Massification in higher education: large classes and student learning. High Educ, 67(6), 711–719.
Hunter-Jones, P. (2012). The continuum of learning disengagement: Ethnographic insights into experiential learning in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 34(1), 19–29.
Huxam, M. (2005). Learning in lectures: do ‘interactive windows’ help? Act Learn High Educ, 6(1), 17–31.
Keogh, K., Sterling, L., & Venables, A. (2007). A scalable and portable structure for conducting successful year-long undergraduate software team projects. J Inf Technol Educ, 6, 515–540.
Kerr, S. (1975). On the folly of rewarding a, while hoping for B. Acad Manag J, 18(4), 769–783.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ Psychol, 41(2), 75–86.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of Learning & Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (Vol. 5, the SAGE CommText series). London: SAGE.
Lund Dean, K., & Forray, J. M. (2016). ‘Malevolent, callous, or selfish?’ experiential teaching and the ethics of student deception. J Manag Educ, 40(2), 115–120.
Lund Dean, K., & Jolly, J. P. (2012). Student identity, disengagement, and learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 228–243.
Maringe, F., & Sing, N. (2014). Teaching large classes in an increasingly internationalising higher education environment: pedagogical, quality and equity issues. High Educ, 67(6), 761–782.
Mattson, K. (2005). Why 'active learning' can be perilous to the profession. Academe, 91(1), 23–26.
McGraw-Hill Manager’s Hot Seat (n.d.). http://highered.mheducation.com/sites/0073312126/information_center_view0/index.html.
Meltzer, D. E., & Manivannan, K. (2002). Transforming the lecture-hall environment: the fully interactive physics lecture. Am J Phys, 70(6), 639–654.
Messineo, M., Gaither, G., Ritchie, K., & Bott, J. (2007). Inexperienced versus experienced students’ expectations for active learning in large classes. Coll Teach, 55(3), 125–134.
Miner, R. (1992). Reflections on teaching a large class. J Manag Educ, 16(3), 290–302.
Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university. Teach High Educ, 15(2), 175–185.
National Association of Colleges and Employers (2015). Class of 2015 Student Survey. http://www.naceweb.org/surveys/student.aspx.
National Survey of Student Engagement (2014). NSSE Annual Results 2014: Bringing the Institution into Focus. Indiana University, http://nsse.indiana.edu/html/annual_results.cfm
Obenland, C. A., Munson, A. H., & Hutchinson, J. S. (2012). Silent students’ participation in a large active learning science classroom. J Coll Sci Teach, 42(2), 90–101.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). CA Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Peterson, T. O. (2004). So you’re thinking of trying problem-based learning?: three critical success factors for implementation. J Manag Educ, 28(5), 630–648.
Schiming, R. C. (n.d.). Impact of class size on teaching and learning. Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. Minnesota State University Mankato. https://www.mnsu.edu/cetl/teachingresources/articles/classsize.html#performance.
Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educ Psychol, 42(2), 91–97.
Seidel, S. B., & Tanner, K. D. (2013, Winter). “What if students revolt?”—considering student resistance: origins, options, and opportunities for investigation. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 586–595.
Severiens, S., Meeuwisse, M., & Born, M. (2015). Student experience and academic success: comparing a student-centred and and lecture-based course programme. High Educ, 70(1), 1–17.
Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. J Eng Educ, 94(1), 87–101.
Symonds, M. R. E. (2014). Lecturing and other face-to-face teaching—too much or too little? An assessment based on student feedback and fail rates. HIgher Education Research & Development, 33(6), 1221–1231.
The National Survey of Student Engagement (2014). NSSE Annual Results 2014. Indiana University. http://nsse.indiana.edu/html/annual_results.cfm
Weimer, M. (2009). Objections to active learning. Faculty Focus. http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/learning-styles/objections-to-active-learning/.
Weimer, M. (2013). Learner centered teaching: five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Wharton, R., & Parry, L. (2003). The good, the bad, and the ugly: using experiential learning in the classroom. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 56–68.
Yarnall, L., & Fusco, J. (2014). Applying the brakes: how practical classroom decisions affect the adoption of inquiry instruction. J Coll Sci Teach, 43(6), 52–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lund Dean, K., Wright, S. Embedding engaged learning in high enrollment lecture-based classes. High Educ 74, 651–668 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0070-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0070-4