Abstract
Open education, including the use of open educational resources (OER) and the adoption of open education practice, has the potential to challenge educators to change their practice in fundamental ways. This paper forms part of a larger study focusing on higher education educators’ learning from and through their engagement with OER. The first part of the study was a quantitative survey investigating educators’ learning behaviour when they learned to use OER in their practice. The second part of the study explored qualitatively how educators engaged with OER and how they conceptualised their learning. Data were gathered through interviews with 30 higher education educators. This paper reports the analysis of these interviews. The analysis draws on the theory of self-regulated learning and cultural–historical activity theory to explore the challenges adult education practitioners encounter when changing their practice. The study tests the application of a framework that traces the discursive manifestations of contradictions, exploring how this framework can be used to examine different aspects of self-regulated learning as educators learn how to use OER. We have identified three distinct tensions in higher education educators’ practice: tensions between the emerging needs of the individual (as he or she adopts new forms of practice) and organisational policies; between the transfer of responsibilities from educators to students as new practice is embedded and institutional accountability; and between cost efficiency and learning objectives. The framework for the discursive manifestations of contradictions was a useful tool used to surface these apparent tensions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Banzato, M. (2012). Barriers to teacher educators seeking, creating and sharing open educational resources: An empirical study of the use of OER in education in Italy. In 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 1–6).
Beetham, H., Falconer, I., McGill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2012). Open practices: briefing paper. JISC. Retrieved from https://oersynth.pbworks.com/w/page/51668352/OpenPracticesBriefing.
Cape Town Declaration. (2008). Read the Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/readthe-declaration.
Carey, T., Davis, A., Ferreras, S., & Porter, D. (2015). Using open educational practices to support institutional strategic excellence in teaching, learning & scholarship. Open Praxis, 7(2), 161–171.
Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (2007). What’s in a Name? New Labour’s citizen-consumers and the remaking of public service. Cultural Studies, 21(4–5), 738–757.
Conole, G. C., & Ehlers, U. D. (2010). Open educational practices: Unleashing the power of OER. In UNESCO Workshop on OER, Windhoek, Namibia.
Cox, G. (2016). Explaining the relations between culture, structure and agency in lecturers’ contrivution and non-contribution to Open Educational Resources in a higher education institution. Retrieved from http://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/20300.
du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.
Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2007). Leadership in networked learning communities: defining the terrain. School Leadership and Management, 27(3), 239–258. doi:10.1080/13632430701379503.
Ehlers, U. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10.
Ellström, P. E. (2011). Informal learning at work: Conditions, processes and logics. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 105–119). London: Sage.
Emery, Y., & Giauque, D. (2003). Emergence of contradictory injunctions in Swiss NPM projects. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(6), 468–481.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Communication, discourse and activity. The Communication Review, 3(1), 165–185.
Engeström, Y. (2007). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Management Learning, 38(3), 271–275.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts. A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387.
Evans, M., & Stone-Johnson, C. (2010). Internal leadership challenges of network participation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(2), 203–220.
Fairclough, N. (2000). Language and neo-liberalism. Discourse and Society, 11(2), 147–148.
Falconer, I., Littlejohn, A., McGill, L., & Beetham, H. (2016). Motives and tensions in the release of Open Educational Resources: the UKOER programme, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.
Fontana, R., Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2015). Measuring self-regulated learning in the workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 32–52.
Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7(2), 329–348.
Gruering, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of new public management. International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 1–25. doi:10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1.
Hager, P. (2011). Theories of workplace learning. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 17–31). London: Sage.
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2013). A model of cost-cutting in government? The great management revolution in UK central government reconsidered. Public Administration, 91(1), 114–134.
Hood, N, & Littlejohn, A. (2016). Knowledge typologies for professional learning: educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice. Educational Technology Research and Development.
Il’enkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays in its history and theory. Moscow: Progress.
Kalliola, S., & Nakari, R. (2006). Rajojen ylittäminen sosiaalisena innovaationa kuntien kehittämistoiminnassa. In P. Jokivuori, R. Latva-Karjanmaa, & A. Ropo (Eds.), Työelämän taitekohtia Työpoliittinen tutkimus 309 (pp. 34–50). Helsinki: Työministeriö.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prence-Hall.
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29.
Littlejohn, A., Falconer, I., McGill, L., & Beetham, H. (2014). Open Networks and Bounded Communities: Tensions Inherent in Releasing Open Educational Resources. In A. Littlejohn & C. Pegler (Eds.), Reusing Open Resources: learning in open networks for work, life and education (pp. 57–69). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2016). How educators build knowledge and expand their practice: The case of open education resources. British Journal of Educational Technology,. doi:10.1111/bjet.12438.
Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2014). Reusing resources: open for learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2014-02/.
Livingston-Vale, K., & Long, P. (2003). Models for open learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to eLearning. London: Kogan Page.
Martínez-Roldán, C. M. (2015). Translanguaging practices as mobilization of linguistic resources in a Spanish/English bilingual after-school program: An analysis of contradictions. International Multilingual Research Journal, 9(1), 43–58.
Masterman, L., & Wild, J. (2012). OER impact study: Research Report. JISC Open Educational Resources Programme. Retrieved from http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614114910/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/oer/JISCOERImpactStudyResearchReportv1-0.pdf.
McAndrew, P. (2011). Inspiring creativity in organisations, teachers and learners through Open Educational Resources. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 14(2), 1–9.
McGill, L., Beetham, H., Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. (2010). JISC/HE Academy OER Programme: Pilot Phase Synthesis and Evaluation Report. Retrieved from https://OERynth.pbworks.com/w/page/29688444/Pilot%20Phase%20Synthesis%20and%20Evaluation%20Report.
Moore, M. G. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, XLIV(12), 661–679.
OECD. (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document/41/0,3746,en_2649_35845581_38659497_1_1_1_1,00.html.
OPAL. (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus to open educational practices. OPAL Report 2011. Essen, Germany: Open Education Quality Initiative.
Pereira Querol, M. A. (2011). Learning challenges in biogas production for sustainability: An activity theoretical study of a network from a swine industry chain. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Porter, D. A. (2013). Exploring the practices of educators using open educational resources (OER) in the British Columbia higher education system (Doctoral dissertation, Education: Faculty of Education). Retrieved from: http://summit.sfu.ca/item/13663.
Richter, P., & Cornford, J. (2008). Customer relationship management and citizenship: Technologies and identities in public services. Social Policy and Society, 7(02), 211–220.
Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: what we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442.
Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3, 130–154.
Tynjälä, P. (2013). Toward a 3-P model of workplace learning: A literature review. Vocations and Learning, 6(1), 11–36.
Vainio, J. (2012). Hegemony, contradiction, and gender in the context of Finnish university physics. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
van Eekelen, I. M., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Self-regulation in higher education teacher learning. Higher Education, 50, 447–471.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.
Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open educational resources: A review of the literature. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 781-789). New York: Springer.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted as part of the Erasmus+ExplOERer Project, funded by the European Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaatrakoski, H., Littlejohn, A. & Hood, N. Learning challenges in higher education: an analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice. High Educ 74, 599–615 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0067-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0067-z