Collaborative research in contexts of inequality: the role of social reflexivity
This article reports on the role and value of social reflexivity in collaborative research in contexts of extreme inequality. Social reflexivity mediates the enablements and constraints generated by the internal and external contextual conditions impinging on the research collaboration. It fosters the ability of participants in a collaborative project to align their interests and collectively extend their agency towards a common purpose. It influences the productivity and quality of learning outcomes of the research collaboration. The article is written by fourteen members of a larger research team, which comprised 18 individuals working within the academic development environment in eight South African universities. The overarching research project investigated the participation of academics in professional development activities, and how contextual, i.e. structural and cultural, and agential conditions, influence this participation. For this sub-study on the experience of the collaboration by fourteen of the researchers, we wrote reflective pieces on our own experience of participating in the project towards the end of the third year of its duration. We discuss the structural and cultural conditions external to and internal to the project, and how the social reflexivity of the participants mediated these conditions. We conclude with the observation that policy injunctions and support from funding agencies for collaborative research, as well as support from participants’ home institutions are necessary for the flourishing of collaborative research, but that the commitment by individual participants to participate, learn and share, is also necessary.
KeywordsCollaboration Educational research Corporate agency Social reflexivity Professional development
This research was funded by the National Research Foundation (Grant No: 90353). Thanks to Peter Kahn, who played an extremely useful role as a critical friend in responding to a draft of the paper.
- Archer, M. (2010). Introduction: The reflexive re-turn. In M. Archer (Ed.), Conversations about reflexivity (pp. 1–13). Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar
- Cox, M. (2006). Phases in the development of a change model: Communities of practice as change agents in higher education. In L. Hunt, A. Bromage, & B. Tomkinson (Eds.), The realities of change in higher education: Interventions to promote learning and teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Donati, P. (2010). Reflexivity after modernity. In M. Archer (Ed.), Conversations about reflexivity (pp. 144–164). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Griffin, G., Hamberg, K., & Lundgren, B. (2013). The social politics of research collaboration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Heron, J. (1985). The role of reflection in comparative enquiry. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Milton Park: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Leibowitz, B., Bozalek, V., Carolissen, R., Nicholls, L., Rohleder, P., & Swartz, L. (2012a). Educating the educators: Creating a powerful learning environment. In B. Leibowitz, L. Swartz, V. Bozalek, R. Carollissen, L. Nicholls, & P. Rohleder (Eds.), Community, self and identity: educating South African university students for citizenship (pp. 117–129). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
- Maxwell, J. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar
- Sayer, A. (1998). Abstraction: A realist interpretation. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 120–143). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Smith, K., MacKenzie, J., & Meyers, R. (2014). Exploring the feasibility of international collaboration and relationship building through a virtual partnership scheme. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(1) article 7.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, P. S. O., Stoddard, H. A., & Kalishman, S. (2010). Collaborative research in medical education: A discussion of theory and practice. Medical Education, 44(12), 1175–1184.Google Scholar
- Walker, M. (2001). Reconstructing professionalism in university teaching: Teachers and learners in action. London: SRHE.Google Scholar