Higher Education

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 1–16 | Cite as

Research-university governance in Thailand: the case of Chulalongkorn University

Article

Abstract

This specific case of Chulalongkorn University (CU), Thailand, is useful to readers who are interested in comparative aspect of the experiences of research universities in the South East Asian context. This paper aims to provide a description of the environments, changes, and university stakeholders’ perceptions in terms of governance arrangements when CU envisioned itself to be a comprehensive public university geared towards becoming a research-oriented university, and in line with national and international changes in the higher education landscape. The analysis framework of the institutional university governance is examined through three dimensions: (1) context-underpinning factors; (2) incentive arrangements and funding; and (3) monitoring and oversight mechanisms. The study adopted a qualitative approach, which was based on three methods of data collection: document analysis, interviews, and observations. There were 33 interviews conducted in the study. The 33 research participants could be categorized into 5 main groups: (1) 6 senior officials from governmental agencies and independent organizations; (2) 2 junior officials working for the Office of the Higher Education Commission; (3) 16 top executives of different faculties and the central administration from CU; (4) 8 academics from different faculties of CU; and (5) 1 graduate student.

Keywords

Higher education governance Thailand Agency theory Research university Funding Quality assurance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the academic support, scholarships, travel grants and friendship from the University of Hong Kong, the European Union, the University of Oslo, the University of Tampere, and the University of Aveiro during my studies of Ph.D. degree and Master’s degree. The author also greatly appreciates those research participants of CU and different organizations in this study, including the feedbacks from the paper reviewers. This study is a part of my Ph.D. dissertation during my studies at the Faculty of Education, the University of Hong Kong. It has been edited and rewritten.

References

  1. Brew, A., & Boud, D. (2009). Understanding academics’ engagement with research. In A. Brew & L. Lucas (Eds.), Academic research and researchers (pp. 189–203). Glasgow: Bell and Bain.Google Scholar
  2. Cheng, K. M. (1997). The policymaking process. In G. A. Postiglione & W. O. Lee (Eds.), Schooling in Hong Kong: Organization, teaching and social context (pp. 65–78). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cheng, K. M. (2003). Qualitative research and educational policy-making: Approaching the reality in developing countries. In E. R. Beauchamp (Ed.), Comparative education reader (pp. 259–276).Google Scholar
  4. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  5. Gornitzka, A., Stensaker, B., Smeby, J.-C., & de Boer, H. D. (2004). Contract arrangements in the Nordic countries. Solving the efficiency/effectiveness dilemma? Higher Education in Europe, 29(1), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hazelkorn, E. (2004). Growing research: Challenges for late developers and newcomers. Higher Education Management and Policy, 16(1), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Horta, H., Sato, M., & Yonezawa, A. (2011). Academic inbreeding: Exploring its characteristics and rationale in Japanese universities using a qualitative perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kiranandana, S. (2008). Bon Sentang Sai Bariharn Chulalongkorn Mahavitayalai Khong Sadsadajarn Khunying Suchada Kiranandana. [On the path of administration at Chulalongkorn Univesity of Prof. Khunying Suchada Kiranandana]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kivisto, J. A. (2007). Agency theory as a framework for the government-university relationship. Academic Dissertation, Higher Education Group: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lane, J. E. (2007). The Spider web of oversight: An analysis of external oversight of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(6), 615–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lane, J. E., & Kivisto, J. A. (2008). Interests, information, and incentives in higher education: Principal-agent theory and its potential applications to the study of higher education governance. In Higher education (pp. 141–179). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46, 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Llerena, P., & Meyer-Krahmer, F. (2003). Interdiciplinary research and the organization of the university: General challenges and a case study. In A. Geuna, A. J. Salter, & W. E. Steinmueller (Eds.), Science and innovation: Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance (pp. 69–88). Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, M. T., & Pope, M. L. (2003). Leadership in faculty governance. In M. T. Miller & J. Caplow (Eds.), Policy and university faculty governance (pp. 45–57). Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Pusser, B., & Turner, S. E. (2004). Nonprofit and for-profit governance in higher education. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Governing academia (pp. 235–257). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rungfamai, K. (2008). Higher education and institutional-autonomy policy in Thailand: The perspective of agency theory. Master’s thesis. University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  17. Rungfamai, K. (2011). Research universities in Thailand: Challenges to governance. PhD. dissertation. The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  18. Salmi, J. (1994). Conclusion: Higher education reform in perspective. In J. Salmi & A. M. Verspoor (Eds.), Revitalizing higher education (pp. 411–419). Oxford: IAU Press.Google Scholar
  19. Salmi, J. (2009). The challenges of establishing world-class universities. Washington: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tongklomsee, J., Duangmanee, A., Datesura, C., & Ayurayeanyoung, A. (2010). Ekkasarn mailek 5: Yudtasart karnkubklean mahavidtayalai Thai su mahavidtayalai radubloke. [Document No. 5: The strategy for propelling Thai universities into world-class universities]. Document presented at the ‘The propelling of Thai universities into world-class universities’ seminar of the Department of Educational Policy, Management and Leadership, the Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  21. World Bank. (2009). Towards a competitive higher education system in a global economy. Bangkok: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research DepartmentDusit Thani CollegeBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations