This study attempts to relate faculty feelings towards writing with writing genres, perceived competences and values associated to writing. 67 foreign languages faculty in Colombia and Spain voluntarily filled in a four-section on-line questionnaire entitled The Writing Feelings Questionnaire. All the sections were Likert Scale type. The first, Affective dimension, consisted of a list of bipolar adjectives (feelings) associated to writing; the second, Genres, asked about frequency of use of written genres; in the third one, Competences, faculty evaluated their perceived proficiency in writing competences; in section fourth, Good writing, faculty valued good writing characteristics. Exploratory factor analyses were performed and subsequently, data were related through a co-occurrence analysis. Results showed a three-factor structure for the four sections, associating: (a) writing to feelings of demanding standards of writing, satisfaction and importance; (b) genres to research writing, technical writing and narrative writing; (c) perceived writing competences to the management of formal and technical mechanisms, discursive mechanisms and in a less percentage, composition processes competences; and (d) good writing to data-driven content information, argumentative procedures and rhetoric mechanisms. Correlations showed that perceived proficiency in writing competences was related to all feelings. Besides, participants conceived writing as demanding, but also as important and satisfactory in their profession. In conclusion, being conscious of the importance of writing a specific genre and perceiving as competent writers are the variables that lead faculty identity to devote time and energy to increase their production of research writing genres.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Badia, A., Meneses, J., & Monereo, C. (2014). Affective dimension of university professors about their teaching: An exploration through the semantic differential technique. Universitas Psychologica, 13(1), 161–173. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-1.adup.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bazerman, C. (1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the social sciences, 11(3), 361–387.
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Bazerman, C. (1995). Response: Curricular responsibilities and professional difference. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 249–259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bazerman, C., & Prior, P. (Eds.). (2004). What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.
Cameron, J., Nairn, K., & Higgins, J. (2009). Demystifying academic writing: Reflections on emotions, know-how and academic identity. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 269–284.
Camps, A., & Castelló, M. (2013). La escritura académica en la universidad. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(1), 17–36.
Carlino, P. (2012). New genres in the academy: Issues of practice, meaning making and identity. In M. Castello & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies. Studies in writing (24). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Castelló, M. (2007). El proceso de composición de textos académicos. In Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos: Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 47–82). Barcelona: Grao.
Castelló, M., & Iñesta, A. (2012). Texts as artifacts-in-activity: Developing authorial identity and academic voice in writing academic research papers. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 179–200). Bingley: Emerald group Publishing Limited.
Castelló, M., Mateos, M., Castells, N., Iñesta, A., Cuevas, I., & Solé, I. (2012). Academic writing practices in Spanish universities. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(27), 569–590.
Castelló, M., Mateos, M. (2015). Las representaciones de profesores y estudiantes sobre la escritura académica en las universidades españolas. Cultura y Educación, 27(3).
Chitez, M., & Kruse, O. (2012). Writing cultures and genres in European higher education. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies. Studies in writing series (Vol. 24, pp. 151–175). Bingley: Emerald Group.
Corcelles, M., Oliva, A., Castelló, M., & Milian, M. (2015). Writing at university. Are we on the same page? Cultura y Educación, 27(3).
Day, C., & Leitch, R. (2001). Teachers’ and teacher educators’ lives: The role of emotion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 403–415.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272.
Freedman, A., Adam, C., & Smart, G. (1994). Wearing suits to class simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11(2), 193–226.
Halliday, M. A. (1985). An introduction to functional linguistics (p. 94). London: Edward Arnold.
Hargreaves, A. (2001). The emotional geographies of teachers’ relations with colleagues. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 503–527.
Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1), 3–33.
Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (2000). Student writing in higher education: New contexts. Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (2009). Lecturers’ everyday writing as professional practice in the university as workplace: New insights into academic identities. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 417–428.
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.
Lee, I. (2013). Becoming a writing teacher: Using “identity” as an analytic lens to understand EFL writing teachers’ development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 330–345.
Lonka, K., Chow, A., Keskinen, J., Hakkarainen, K., Sandström, N., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). How to measure PhD students’ conceptions of academic writing? Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 245–269.
Miller, J. (2009). Teacher identity. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to language teacher education (pp. 172–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Prior, P., & Bilbro, R. (2012). Academic enculturation: Developing literate practices and disciplinary identities. University Writing. Selves and Texts in Academic Societies, 19–32.
Prior, P., & Thorne, S. L. (2014). Research paradigms: Product, process, and social activity. In E.-M. Jakobs & D. Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Vol. 10, pp. 31–54).The Mouton de Gruyter Handbooks of Applied Linguistics Series. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rai, L., & Lillis, T. (2013). ‘Getting it Write’ in social work: Exploring the value of writing in academia to writing for professional practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 352–364.
Robinson-Pant, A., & Street, B. (2012). Students’ and tutors’ understanding of ‘new’ academic literacy practices. University Writing: Selves and Texts in Academic Societies, 24, 71.
Russell, D. R., & Cortes, V. (2012). Academic and scientific texts: The same or different communities? In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing. Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 3–18). Emerald: Bingley.
Russell, D. R., & Yañez, A. (2003). Big picture people rarely become historians: Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing society: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 331–362). Retrieved May 21, 2014, from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/russell/.
Shapiro, S. (2010). Revisiting the teachers’ lounge: Reflections on emotional experience and teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 616–621.
Teberosky, A. (2007). El texto académico. In M. Castello (Ed.), Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 17–46). Barcelona: Grao.
Zembylas, M. (2005). Three perspectives on linking the cognitive and the emotional in science learning: Conceptual change, socio-constructivism and poststructuralism. Studies in Science Education, 41, 91–116.
About this article
Cite this article
del Pilar Gallego Castaño, L., Castelló Badia, M. & Badia Garganté, A. Faculty feelings as writers: relationship with writing genres, perceived competences, and values associated to writing. High Educ 71, 719–734 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9933-3
- Affective dimension
- Faculty writing
- Writing genres
- Writing competences
- Faculty identity