Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 71, Issue 5, pp 719–734 | Cite as

Faculty feelings as writers: relationship with writing genres, perceived competences, and values associated to writing

  • Liliana del Pilar Gallego CastañoEmail author
  • Montserrat Castelló Badia
  • Antoni Badia Garganté
Article

Abstract

This study attempts to relate faculty feelings towards writing with writing genres, perceived competences and values associated to writing. 67 foreign languages faculty in Colombia and Spain voluntarily filled in a four-section on-line questionnaire entitled The Writing Feelings Questionnaire. All the sections were Likert Scale type. The first, Affective dimension, consisted of a list of bipolar adjectives (feelings) associated to writing; the second, Genres, asked about frequency of use of written genres; in the third one, Competences, faculty evaluated their perceived proficiency in writing competences; in section fourth, Good writing, faculty valued good writing characteristics. Exploratory factor analyses were performed and subsequently, data were related through a co-occurrence analysis. Results showed a three-factor structure for the four sections, associating: (a) writing to feelings of demanding standards of writing, satisfaction and importance; (b) genres to research writing, technical writing and narrative writing; (c) perceived writing competences to the management of formal and technical mechanisms, discursive mechanisms and in a less percentage, composition processes competences; and (d) good writing to data-driven content information, argumentative procedures and rhetoric mechanisms. Correlations showed that perceived proficiency in writing competences was related to all feelings. Besides, participants conceived writing as demanding, but also as important and satisfactory in their profession. In conclusion, being conscious of the importance of writing a specific genre and perceiving as competent writers are the variables that lead faculty identity to devote time and energy to increase their production of research writing genres.

Keywords

Affective dimension Faculty writing Feelings Writing genres Writing competences Faculty identity 

References

  1. Badia, A., Meneses, J., & Monereo, C. (2014). Affective dimension of university professors about their teaching: An exploration through the semantic differential technique. Universitas Psychologica, 13(1), 161–173. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-1.adup.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bazerman, C. (1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the social sciences, 11(3), 361–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Bazerman, C. (1995). Response: Curricular responsibilities and professional difference. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 249–259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Bazerman, C., & Prior, P. (Eds.). (2004). What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, J., Nairn, K., & Higgins, J. (2009). Demystifying academic writing: Reflections on emotions, know-how and academic identity. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camps, A., & Castelló, M. (2013). La escritura académica en la universidad. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(1), 17–36.Google Scholar
  10. Carlino, P. (2012). New genres in the academy: Issues of practice, meaning making and identity. In M. Castello & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies. Studies in writing (24). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Castelló, M. (2007). El proceso de composición de textos académicos. In Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos: Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 47–82). Barcelona: Grao.Google Scholar
  12. Castelló, M., & Iñesta, A. (2012). Texts as artifacts-in-activity: Developing authorial identity and academic voice in writing academic research papers. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 179–200). Bingley: Emerald group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castelló, M., Mateos, M., Castells, N., Iñesta, A., Cuevas, I., & Solé, I. (2012). Academic writing practices in Spanish universities. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(27), 569–590.Google Scholar
  14. Castelló, M., Mateos, M. (2015). Las representaciones de profesores y estudiantes sobre la escritura académica en las universidades españolas. Cultura y Educación, 27(3).Google Scholar
  15. Chitez, M., & Kruse, O. (2012). Writing cultures and genres in European higher education. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies. Studies in writing series (Vol. 24, pp. 151–175). Bingley: Emerald Group. Google Scholar
  16. Corcelles, M., Oliva, A., Castelló, M., & Milian, M. (2015). Writing at university. Are we on the same page? Cultura y Educación, 27(3). Google Scholar
  17. Day, C., & Leitch, R. (2001). Teachers’ and teacher educators’ lives: The role of emotion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freedman, A., Adam, C., & Smart, G. (1994). Wearing suits to class simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11(2), 193–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halliday, M. A. (1985). An introduction to functional linguistics (p. 94). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, A. (2001). The emotional geographies of teachers’ relations with colleagues. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (2000). Student writing in higher education: New contexts. Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  24. Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (2009). Lecturers’ everyday writing as professional practice in the university as workplace: New insights into academic identities. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, I. (2013). Becoming a writing teacher: Using “identity” as an analytic lens to understand EFL writing teachers’ development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lonka, K., Chow, A., Keskinen, J., Hakkarainen, K., Sandström, N., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). How to measure PhD students’ conceptions of academic writing? Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, J. (2009). Teacher identity. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to language teacher education (pp. 172–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Prior, P., & Bilbro, R. (2012). Academic enculturation: Developing literate practices and disciplinary identities. University Writing. Selves and Texts in Academic Societies, 19–32. Google Scholar
  31. Prior, P., & Thorne, S. L. (2014). Research paradigms: Product, process, and social activity. In E.-M. Jakobs & D. Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Vol. 10, pp. 31–54).The Mouton de Gruyter Handbooks of Applied Linguistics Series. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  32. Rai, L., & Lillis, T. (2013). ‘Getting it Write’ in social work: Exploring the value of writing in academia to writing for professional practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robinson-Pant, A., & Street, B. (2012). Students’ and tutors’ understanding of ‘new’ academic literacy practices. University Writing: Selves and Texts in Academic Societies, 24, 71.Google Scholar
  34. Russell, D. R., & Cortes, V. (2012). Academic and scientific texts: The same or different communities? In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing. Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 3–18). Emerald: Bingley.Google Scholar
  35. Russell, D. R., & Yañez, A. (2003). Big picture people rarely become historians: Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing society: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 331–362). Retrieved May 21, 2014, from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/russell/.
  36. Shapiro, S. (2010). Revisiting the teachers’ lounge: Reflections on emotional experience and teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 616–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teberosky, A. (2007). El texto académico. In M. Castello (Ed.), Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 17–46). Barcelona: Grao.Google Scholar
  38. Zembylas, M. (2005). Three perspectives on linking the cognitive and the emotional in science learning: Conceptual change, socio-constructivism and poststructuralism. Studies in Science Education, 41, 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liliana del Pilar Gallego Castaño
    • 1
    Email author
  • Montserrat Castelló Badia
    • 2
  • Antoni Badia Garganté
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Foreign LanguagesUniversity of CaldasManizalesColombia
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyRamon Llull UniversityBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Psychology and Educationa SciencesOpen University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations