Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing knowledge sharing and research collaboration among academics: the role of knowledge management

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although knowledge sharing (KS) has been acknowledged as important, universities face issues that may hinder active sharing among its faculty members such as the absence of trust among its members or insufficient incentives rewarded to those who deserved it. The aim of this research is to focus on the impact of knowledge management (KM) factors in encouraging KS among academics. As such, this study sheds insights into existing literature through the inspection of the KM factors in one single KM-KS-Collaboration research model that provides an influential theoretical contribution for research in related fields because it suggests that faculty members’ KS is positively related to openness in communication and face-to-face interactive communication. A self-administered questionnaire using a quota-sampling method with 421 usable responses from 94 professors, 154 associate professors, and 173 senior lecturers were gathered. Partial least squares was employed for a series of data analyses: measurement and structural models assessment. From the analysis, all constructs have composite reliability values more than 0.7 and demonstrate adequate convergent and discriminant validity by having average variance extracted value greater than 0.50. The findings revealed that members’ KS is influenced by trust, organizational rewards, organizational culture, KM system quality, openness in communication and face-to-face interactive communication whereas research collaboration is strongly influenced by KS. This study has reinforced the understanding of KM factors, KS and research collaboration within the context of academic staff in research universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Alawi, A. I., Al-Marzooqi, N. Y., & Mohammed, Y. F. (2007). Organisational culture and knowledge sharing: Critical success factors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., & Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1029–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organisations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azudin, N., Ismail, M. N., & Taherali, Z. (2009). Knowledge sharing among workers: A study on their contribution through informal communication in Cyberjaya, Malaysia. Knowledge Management and E-Learning: An International Journal, 1(2), 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organisational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C. E., River, S., & Hall, N. J. P. (2003). Managerial communication: Bridging theory and practice. (2001), pp. 125–129.

  • Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organisational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, S. E. (2005). The impact of peer mentoring on organizational knowledge creation and sharing: An empirical study in a software firm. Group and Organization Management, 30(3), 319–338. doi:10.1177/1059601103258439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, E., & Bonache, J. (1999). An expert HR system for aligning organizational culture and strategy. Human Resource Planning, 22(1), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I. Y. L., Chen, N.-S., & Kinshuk, (2009a). Examining the factors influencing participants’ knowledge sharing behavior in virtual learning communities. Educational Technology and Society, 12(1), 134–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. L., Sandhu, M. S., & Jain, K. K. (2009b). Knowledge sharing in an American multinational company based in Malaysia. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(2), 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and application (pp. 645–689). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C., Hsu, M., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. Y., Kang, Y. S., & Lee, H. (2008). The effects of socio-technical enablers on knowledge sharing: An exploratory examination. Journal of Information Science, 34(5), 742–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaveland, S., & Eliis, T. J. (2014). Causal model for predicting knowledge sharing via ICTs. In Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–11). Savannah.

  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), Special issue: Technology, organizations, and innovation. https://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/~charlesw/s591/Bocconi-Duke/Papers/C10/CohenLevinthalASQ.pdf

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Madison Avenue, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C. E., & Kelloway, K. E. (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 24(5), 294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormican, K., & Dooley, L. (2007). Knowledge sharing in a collaborative networked environment. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 06(02), 105–114. doi:10.1142/S0219649207001706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., & Baird, L. (2000). Technology is not enough: Improving performance by building organisational memory. MIT Sloan Management Review. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/technology-is-not-enough-improving-performance-by-building-organizational-memory/

  • Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organisation. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currall, S. C., & Judge, T. A. (1995). Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(2), 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long, W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management, 14(4), 113–127.

  • Fong, P. S.-w., & Chu, L. (2006). Exploratory study of knowledge sharing in contracting companies: A sociotechnical perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(9), 928–939. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:9(928).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 328–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, A. (1998). Facing up to market forces. Times education supplement. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/facing-up-to-market-forces/109862.article

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge management’s social dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel. Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurteen, D. (1999). Creating a knowledge sharing culture. Knowledge Management Magazine, 2(5). http://www.gurteen.com/gurteen/gurteen.nsf/id/ksculture

  • Hall, H. (2001). Input-friendliness: Motivating knowledge sharing across intranets. Information Science, 27(3), 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–116. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:What’s+Your+Strategy+for+Managing+Knowledge?#0

  • Hooff, B., & Huysman, M. (2009). Managing knowledge sharing: Emergent and engineering approaches. Information and Management, 46(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 65(2), 153–169. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, L., von Krogh, G., & Roos, J. (1994). Trust and dimensions of knowledge. In 13th SMS conference. Paris.

  • Jain, K. K., Sandhu, M. S., & Goh, S. K. (2015). Organizational climate, trust and knowledge sharing: Insights from Malaysia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 9(1), 54–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandaghi, G., Irani, H. R., Sadat, M. Z., & Maryam, D. (2014). Ranking the knowledge management enablers based on University Academic Members , Staff and Students using AHP Method Ranking the knowledge management enablers based on University Academic Members, Staff and Students using AHP Method. European Journal of Academic Essays, 1(3), 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2001). Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. Journal of Management Information systems, 18(1), 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. Special Issue on Information Technologies and Knowledge Management, MIS Quarterly (29), 1.

  • Keramati, A., & Azadeh, M. A. (2007). Exploring the effects of top management’s commitment on knowledge management success in academia: A case study. International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, 1(3), 292–297. http://www.waset.org/journals/waset/v3/v3-53.pdf

  • Kilmann, R. H. (1989). Managing beyond the quick fix. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. (2003). A study on individual and organisational factors affecting knowledge sharing: Focused on the research and development organisation. Daejeon, South Korea: ChungNam National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. H., & Ju, B. (2008). An analysis of faculty perceptions: Attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic Institution. Library and Information Science Research, 30, 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, U., Ravindran, S., & Freeze, R. (2007). A knowledge management success model: Theoretical development and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 309–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M. F., & Lee, G. G. (2007). Relationships of organizational culture toward knowledge activities. Business Process Management Journal, 13(2), 306–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C. H., & Yip, M. W. (2008). Top management leadership: Success factor of knowledge management implementation in Tunku Abdul Rahman College (Tarc) in Malaysia. In International Conference on the Roles of the Humanities and Social Sciences in Engineering 2008 (ICOHSE08) (pp. 146–159). http://medcontent.metapress.com/index/A65RM03P4874243N.pdf

  • Laycock, M. (2005). Collaborating to compete: Achieving effective knowledge sharing in organisations. The Learning Organisation, 12(6), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. K., & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2002). Factors impacting knowledge sharing. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 1(1), 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organisational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemken, B., Kahler, H., & Rittenbruch, M. (2000). Sustained knowledge management by organisational culture. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-33). Wailea Maui, Hawaii. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/2508738_Sustained_Knowledge_Management_by_Organizational_Culture/file/3deec51df4789640d5.pdf.

  • Liebowitz, J., & Beckman, T. (1998). Knowledge organizations: What every manager should know (1st ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-F. (2007a). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-F. (2007b). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intention. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135–149. doi:10.1177/0165551506068174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-F. (2011). Antecedents of the stage-based knowledge management evolution. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 136–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-F., Lee, H.-S., & Wang, D. W. (2009). Evaluation of factors influencing knowledge sharing based on a fuzzy AHP approach. Journal of Information Science, 36(1), 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F., Lin, S., & Huang, T. (2008). Knowledge sharing and creation in a teachers’ professional virtual community. Computers and Education, 50(3), 742–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Church, A. H. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57–72. doi:10.5465/AME.2002.6640181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, M., & Reynolds, A. (1994). The global learning organisation: Gaining competitive advantage through continuous learning. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R., & O’Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming culture barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J. (1998). If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of internal practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 154–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (2003). Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. The Journal of applied psychology, 83(6), 835–852. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, M., & Ragsdell, G. (2011). To share or not to share knowledge: An ethical dilemma for UK academics? Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 12(2). Retrieved from: http://www.tlainc.com/articl257.htm.

  • Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrides, L., & Nodine, T. (2003). KM in education: Defining the landscape. San Mateo County, CA: Half Moon Bay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. (2002). Intellectual capital, social capital and communities of practice, Knowledge management for beginners. http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/Intellectural_Capital_-_Social_Capital_-_CoP.pdf

  • Powell, W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40(3), 228. doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finklestein, S. (1996). Leveraging intellect. Academy of Management Journal, 10(3), 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, V., & Bardzki, B. (2004). Communication and culture: Designing a knowledge-enabled environment to effect local government reform. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2(3), 197–206. http://www.ejeg.com/volume-2/volume2-issue3/v2-i3-art6-abstract.htm

  • Riege, A. (2005). Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 18–35. doi:10.1108/13673270510602746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) beta. Hamburg: SmartPLS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, S., & Sahay, S. (2004). Implications of space and time for distributed work: An interpretive study of US-Norwegian systems development teams. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. A., & McKeen, J. D. (2003). Instilling a knowledge-sharing culture. In The Third European Conference on Organisational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities (pp. 1–20). Athens, Greece.

  • Stoddart, L. (2001). Managing intranets to encourage knowledge sharing: Opportunities and constraints. Online Information Review, 25(1), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validation choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36(2), 111–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, S. (2007). Perceived barriers of knowledge sharing at individual, organisational and technological levels: A case study on MARDI. Malaysia: Multimedia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhaimee, S., Bakar, A. Z. A., & Alias, R. A. (2006). Knowledge sharing culture in Malaysian public institution of higher education: An overview. In Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Postgraduate Annual Research Seminar.

  • Sveiby, K.-E., & Simon, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work—An empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 420–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifonova, A., & Ronchetti, M. (2006). Hoarding content for mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 4(4), 459. doi:10.1504/IJMC.2006.008952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usoro, A., Sharratt, M. W., Tsui, E., & Shekhar, S. (2007). Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 5(3), 199–212. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, P. (2003). Social, organisational, and technological conditions that enable knowledge sharing. The Netherlands, Delft: Delft University of Technology. http://repository.tudelft.nl/assets/uuid:7fc4952f-2b79-4e6b-92aa-e38fa146af3c/tpm_brink_20031111.pdf

  • Von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee, S. H. (2012). Important enabler in the knowledge sharing process: Top management support. In ICIMTR 2012–2012 International Conference on Innovation, Management and Technology Research (pp. 657–662). doi:10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236477.

  • Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modelling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information and Management, 43(6), 728–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Quaddus, M. (2012). Examining a model of knowledge management systems adoption and diffusion: A partial least square approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 27, 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., & Chen, L. -C. (2007). Can organisational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior? Journal of Information Science, 33(1), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, S., Chen, H., & Jin, X. (2006). Exploring the moderating effects of commitment and perceived value of knowledge in explaining knowledge contribution in virtual communities. In Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  • Yusof, I., & Suhaimi, M. D. (2006). Managing knowledge transfer among academic staff of Institutions of Higher Learning (IHL): Lessons from public universities in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management in Institutes of Higher Learning, Multimedia University, Malaysia and Suan Dusit Rajabhat University. Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Zhuge, J. (2008). Reward systems for implementing knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive corporation. 2008 ISECS international colloquium on computing, communication, control, and management (pp. 514–518). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2009). Business research methods. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyngier, S. (2001). The role of technology in knowledge management: Trends in the Australian corporate environment. In F. Burstein & H. Linger (Eds.), Knowledge management in context (pp. 78–92). Melbourne, VIC: Australian Scholarly Publishing. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/vital/access//services/Download/monash:7335/DOC

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Persiaran Multimedia, 63100, Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia

    Christine Nya-Ling Tan

Authors
  1. Christine Nya-Ling Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Nya-Ling Tan.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The individual-organizational-technological-communication KM enablers (the KM- KS-Collaboration research model)

Full size image

Appendix 2

See Table 1.

Table 1 Research questions and research hypotheses
Full size table

Appendix 3

See Table 2.

Table 2 Profile of the respondents, research work, publication, knowledge sharing involvement
Full size table

Appendix 4

See Table 3.

Table 3 Constructs and items used in the research model
Full size table

Appendix 5

See Table 4.

Table 4 Partial least squares structural model results
Full size table

Appendix 6

See Table 5.

Table 5 Results of the blindfolding estimations
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, C.NL. Enhancing knowledge sharing and research collaboration among academics: the role of knowledge management. High Educ 71, 525–556 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9922-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9922-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation