Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 71, Issue 4, pp 489–503 | Cite as

College choice and the university brand: exploring the consumer decision framework

  • Amber L. StephensonEmail author
  • Alex Heckert
  • David B. Yerger
Article

Abstract

Branding in higher education has become increasingly used as a mechanism of differentiation among competitors to attract prospective students. Although branding in higher education is a common phenomenon, little work has been done assessing the college selection process using a brand choice framework. This paper aims to fill the gap by investigating the college selection process using the consumer decision framework specifically addressing the notion of the consideration set. The study employs qualitative research methods and included interviews of incoming first-year students. The findings reveal that the university brands in the consideration set for a student range from one to eight and need not be of the same type of institution. Also, the findings highlight other brand-related constructs that help to move the university from consideration set to ultimately the college of choice.

Keywords

College choice Consumer decision framework Consideration sets College selection 

References

  1. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Marketing Association. (2014). Online dictionary retrieved November 30, 2014 https://www.ama.org/resources/Pages/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=B&dLetter=B.
  3. Anctil, E. J. (2008). Recommendations for selling higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(2), 89–98.Google Scholar
  4. Balmer, J. M. T., & Gray, E. R. (2003). Corporate brands: What are they? What of them? European Journal of Marketing, 37(7/8), 972–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bastedo, M. N., Samuels, E., & Kleinman, M. (2014). Do charismatic presidents influence college applications and alumni donations? Organizational identity and performance in US higher education. Higher Education, 68, 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, R., & Ali-Choudhury, R. (2009). Prospective students’ perceptions of university brands: An empirical study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19, 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brisoux, J. E., & Laroche, M. (1980). A proposed consumer strategy of simplification for categorizing brands. In J. D. Summey & R. D. Taylor (Eds.), Evolving marketing thought for 1980 (pp. 112–114). New Orleans, LA: Southern Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, R. M., & Mazzarol, T. W. (2009). The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education. Higher Education, 58, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bucklin, R. E., & Gupta, S. (1992). Brand choice, purchase incidence, and segmentation: An integrated modeling approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(2), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapleo, C. (2010). What defines “successful” university brands? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(2), 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapleo, C. (2011). Exploring rationales for branding a university: Should we be seeking to measure branding in UK universities? Journal of Brand Management, 18, 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curtis, T., Abratt, R., & Minor, W. (2009). Corporate brand management in higher education: The case of ERAU. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(6), 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawes, P. L., & Brown, J. (2002). Determinants of awareness, consideration, and choice set size in university choice. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 12(1), 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawes, P. L., & Brown, J. (2004). The composition of consideration and choice sets in undergraduate university choice: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Chernatony, L., & Dall’Olmo Riley, F. (1997). The chasm between managers’ and consumers’ views of brands: The experts’ perspectives. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 5, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (1996). Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Science, 15(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E., & Kohn, C. A. (1974). Brand choice behavior as a function of information load. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joseph, M., Wall Mullen, E., & Spake, D. (2012). University branding: Understanding students’ choice of an educational institution. Journal of Brand Management, 20, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Judson, K. M., Aurand, T. W., Gorchels, L., & Gordon, G. L. (2009). Building a university brand from within: University administrators’ perspectives of internal branding. Services Marketing Quarterly, 30(1), 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Judson, K. M., Gorchels, L., & Aurand, T. W. (2006). Building a university brand from within: A comparison of coaches’ perspectives of internal branding. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 16(1), 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Laidler-Kylander, N., Quelch, J. A., & Simonin, B. L. (2007). Building and valuing global brands in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(3), 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laroche, M., Rosenblatt, J., & Sinclair, I. (1984). Brand categorization strategies in an extensive problem solving situation: A study of university choice. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 175–179.Google Scholar
  25. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McAlexander, J. H., Koenig, H. F., & Schouten, J. W. (2004). Building a university brand community: the long-term impact of shared experiences. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Melewar, T. C., & Akel, S. (2005). The role of corporate identity in the higher education sector. Corporate Communications, 10(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moogan, Y. J., Baron, S., & Bainbridge, S. (2001). Timings and trade-offs in the marketing of higher education courses: A conjoint approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(3), 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narayana, C. L., & Markin, R. J. (1975). Consumer behavior and product performance: An alternative conceptualization. Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Projections of education statistics to 2020, 39th Edition. Table 14. (NCES 2011-026).Google Scholar
  31. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Digest of education statistics, 2011 (NCES 2012-001).Google Scholar
  32. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Price, I., Matzdorf, F., Smith, L., & Agahi, H. (2003). The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities, 21(10), 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosen, D. E., Curran, J. M., & Greenlee, T. B. (1998). College choice in a brand elimination framework: The administrator’s perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 8(4), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shimp, T. A. (1981). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 9–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shocker, A. D., Ben-Akiva, M., Boccaro, B., & Nedungadi, P. (1991). Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing Letters, 2(3), 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sojkin, B., Barkowiak, P., & Skuza, A. (2012). Determinants of higher education choices and student satisfaction: The case of Poland. Higher Education, 63, 565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sojkin, B., Barkowiak, P., & Skuza, A. (2014). Changes in students’ choice determinants in Poland: A comparative study of tertiary business education between 2008 and 2013, Higher Education, published online July 11, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9770-9.
  39. Tavares, O., & Cardoso, S. (2013). Enrolment choices in Portuguese higher education: Do students behave as rational consumers? Higher Education, 66, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Turley, L. W., & LeBlanc, R. P. (1993). An exploratory investigation of consumer decision making in the service sector. The Journal of Services Marketing, 7(4), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turley, L.W., & LeBlanc, R.P. (1995). Evoked sets: A dynamic process model. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3(2), 28–36.Google Scholar
  42. Waeraas, A., & Solbakk, M. N. (2008). Defining the essence of a university: Lessons from higher education branding. Higher Education, 57, 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wintre, M. G., Dilouya, B., Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M. W., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S., Polivy, J., & Adams, G. (2011). Academic achievement in first-year university: Who maintains their high school average? Higher Education, 62, 467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zeithaml, V. A. (1981). How consumer evaluation processes differ between goods and services. In J. H. Donnelly & W. R. George (Eds.), Marketing of services (pp. 186–190). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amber L. Stephenson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alex Heckert
    • 2
  • David B. Yerger
    • 3
  1. 1.School of ManagementUnion Graduate CollegeSchenectadyUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyIndiana University of PennsylvaniaIndianaUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsIndiana University of PennsylvaniaIndianaUSA

Personalised recommendations