College choice and the university brand: exploring the consumer decision framework
- 2.4k Downloads
Branding in higher education has become increasingly used as a mechanism of differentiation among competitors to attract prospective students. Although branding in higher education is a common phenomenon, little work has been done assessing the college selection process using a brand choice framework. This paper aims to fill the gap by investigating the college selection process using the consumer decision framework specifically addressing the notion of the consideration set. The study employs qualitative research methods and included interviews of incoming first-year students. The findings reveal that the university brands in the consideration set for a student range from one to eight and need not be of the same type of institution. Also, the findings highlight other brand-related constructs that help to move the university from consideration set to ultimately the college of choice.
KeywordsCollege choice Consumer decision framework Consideration sets College selection
- American Marketing Association. (2014). Online dictionary retrieved November 30, 2014 https://www.ama.org/resources/Pages/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=B&dLetter=B.
- Anctil, E. J. (2008). Recommendations for selling higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(2), 89–98.Google Scholar
- Brisoux, J. E., & Laroche, M. (1980). A proposed consumer strategy of simplification for categorizing brands. In J. D. Summey & R. D. Taylor (Eds.), Evolving marketing thought for 1980 (pp. 112–114). New Orleans, LA: Southern Marketing Association.Google Scholar
- Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Laroche, M., Rosenblatt, J., & Sinclair, I. (1984). Brand categorization strategies in an extensive problem solving situation: A study of university choice. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 175–179.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Projections of education statistics to 2020, 39th Edition. Table 14. (NCES 2011-026).Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Digest of education statistics, 2011 (NCES 2012-001).Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sojkin, B., Barkowiak, P., & Skuza, A. (2014). Changes in students’ choice determinants in Poland: A comparative study of tertiary business education between 2008 and 2013, Higher Education, published online July 11, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9770-9.
- Turley, L.W., & LeBlanc, R.P. (1995). Evoked sets: A dynamic process model. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3(2), 28–36.Google Scholar
- Zeithaml, V. A. (1981). How consumer evaluation processes differ between goods and services. In J. H. Donnelly & W. R. George (Eds.), Marketing of services (pp. 186–190). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar