Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 69, Issue 6, pp 1007–1018 | Cite as

Researcher creations? The positioning of policy texts in higher education research

  • Paul AshwinEmail author
  • Karen Smith
Article

Abstract

In this article we explore the way in which policy texts are positioned in a selection of higher education journal articles. Previous research has suggested that policy implementation studies have taken an uncritical approach to researching policies. Based on an analysis of articles published in higher education and policy journals in 2011, we argue that whilst these criticisms do appear to be valid, there is a bigger problem with the ways that policy texts are analysed and used in higher education research. This is that rather than subjecting particular policy texts to a sustained analysis, the majority of articles appear to focus on having an impact on policies that are very broadly conceived. We explore the implications of this and conclude by calling for more sustained, in-depth, analytical and critical research into the development and impact of higher education policies on higher education practices.

Keywords

Higher education policy Policy texts Higher education research 

References

  1. Ashwin, P. (2012). How often are theories developed through empirical research in higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 37, 941–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse, 21, 45–57.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structuralist approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chalmers, I. (2005). If evidence-informed policy works in practice, does it matter if it doesn’t work in theory? Evidence & Policy, 1, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammersley, M. (2005). Is the evidence-based practice movement doing more good than harm? Reflections on Iain Chalmers’ case for research-based policymaking and practice. Evidence & Policy, 1, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hardy, I. (2009). The politics of educational policy studies: A preliminary analysis of leading educational policy journal articles. Critical Studies in Education, 50, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartley, D. (2006). Pulling us apart? Relativism and instrumentalism in contemporary educational research. Educational Review, 58(3), 269–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). Globalization, edu-business and network governance: The policy sociology of Stephen J. Ball and rethinking education policy analysis. London Review of Education, 11(3), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nudzor, H. (2009). Reconceptualising the paradox in policy implementation: A post-modernist conceptual approach. Discourse, 30, 501–513.Google Scholar
  11. Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings: Contested terrain. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Saarinen, T. (2008). Position of text and discourse analysis in higher education policy research. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 719–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saarinen, T., & Ursin, J. (2012). Dominant and emerging approaches in the study of higher education policy change. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saunders, L. (2005). Research and policy: Reflections on their relationship. Evidence & Policy, 1, 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simons, M., Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2009). Re-reading education policies: Part I and Part II. In M. Simons, M. Olssen, & M. Peters (Eds.), Re-reading education policies: a handbook studying the policy agenda of the 21st century (pp. 1–95). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, K. (2010). Research, policy and funding: Academic treadmills and the squeeze on intellectual spaces. British Journal of Sociology, 61, 176–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18, 23–35.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor Webb, P. (2014). Policy problematization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tight, M. (2007). Bridging the Divide: A comparative analysis of articles in higher education journals published inside and outside North America. Higher Education, 53, 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tight, M. (2012). Researching higher education (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar
  21. Vidovich, L. (2007). Removing policy from its pedestal: Some theoretical framings and practical possibilities. Educational Review, 59(3), 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weaver-Hightower, M. (2008). An ecology metaphor for educational policy analysis: A call for complexity. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) research and education policymaking: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Higher Education Research and Evaluation, Department of Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityCounty South, LancasterUK
  2. 2.Educational Development UnitUniversity of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations