Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 69, Issue 3, pp 361–374 | Cite as

International accreditation as global position taking: an empirical exploration of U.S. accreditation in Mexico

  • Gerardo Blanco RamírezEmail author
Article

Abstract

Institutional accreditation in higher education holds universities accountable through external evaluation; at the same time, accreditation constitutes an opportunity for higher education leaders to demonstrate the quality of their institutions. In an increasingly global field of higher education, in which quality practices become diffused across national boundaries, U.S. institutional accreditation has been adopted in many countries as a form of external quality assurance. This study follows an ethnographic case study approach to explore in-depth how a Mexican institution of higher education, located only a few miles away from the U.S.–Mexico border, engaged in the process of institutional accreditation with a U.S. regional accrediting agency. Four themes constitute the finding of this study: (a) Reputational value is the central motivation to pursue U.S. accreditation given that, through accreditation, the institution in Mexico became connected to internationally recognized universities; (b) despite several benefits, the accreditation process established a complex division of labor in which members of the academic staff are necessary yet distanced from decision making; (c) compliance with highly challenging—yet construed as fair—standards legitimizes both the accreditation process and the U.S. accreditor; and (d) language and translation are valuable concepts to understand the accreditation process. Together, these findings suggest that U.S. accreditation may be approached as an exercise of global position taking.

Keywords

Accreditation Globalization Quality Position taking 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research received partial support from the Graduate School and the Department of Educational Policy, Research & Administration of the University of Massachusetts Amherst. The author is grateful to Prof. Joseph B. Berger who served as dissertation research director.

References

  1. Alstete, J. W. (2004). Accreditation matters: Achieving academic recognition and renewal. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Boston, MA: UNESCO/Sense.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, A. W., & Lee, C. B. T. (1971). The invisible colleges: A profile of small, private colleges with limited resources. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Billing, D. (2004). International comparisons and trends in external quality assurance of higher education: Commonality or diversity? Higher Education, 47(1), 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco Ramírez, G. (2013). Studying quality beyond technical rationality: Political and symbolic perspectives. Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), 126–141. doi: 10.1080/13538322.2013.774804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brittingham, B. (2009). Accreditation in the United States: How did we get to where we are? New Directions for Higher Education, 145, 7–27. doi: 10.1002/he.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Council for Higher Education Accreditation. (2012). The condition of accreditation: U. S. accreditation in, 2011. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.Google Scholar
  11. Council for Higher Education Accreditation. (2013). Database of institutions accredited by recognized U. S. accrediting organizations [Electronic database]. Retrieved from http://www.chea.org/search/search.asp.
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Dill, D. D. (1997). Accreditation, assessment, anarchy? The evolution of academic quality assurance policies in the United States. In J. Brennan, P. de Vries, & R. Williams (Eds.), Standards and quality in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  14. Eaton, J. S. (2007). An international accreditation space. In J. Tres & B. Sanyal (Eds.), Higher Education in the World 2007: Accreditation for quality assurance: What is at stake? (pp. 159–165). New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.Google Scholar
  15. Eaton, J. S. (2009). Accreditation in the United States. New Directions for Higher Education, 145, 79–86. doi: 10.1002/he.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ewell, P. (2008). U.S. accreditation and the future of quality assurance: A tenth anniversary report from the council for higher education accreditation. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.Google Scholar
  17. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Grovogui, S. N. (2011). A revolution nonetheless: The Global South in international relations. The Global South, 5(1), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey, L. (2004). War of the worlds: Who wins in the battle for quality supremacy? Quality in Higher Education, 10(1), 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvey, L., & Newton, J. (2007). Transforming quality evaluation: Moving on. In D. F. Westerheijden, M. J. Rosa & B. Stensaker (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp.225–245). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Huisman, J., & Currie, J. (2004). Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water? Higher Education, 48(4), 529–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson, R. S., Davis, J. H., & Jackson, F. R. (2010). Redesigning regional accreditation: The impact on institutional planning. Planning for Higher Education, 38(4), 9–19.Google Scholar
  23. Kells, H. R. (1995). Self-study processes: A guide to self-evaluation in higher education (4th ed.). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx. Kells, H. R. (1992). Self-regulation in higher education : A multi-national perspective on collaborative systems of quality assurance and control. London; Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  24. Kells, H. R. (1999). National higher education evaluation systems: Methods for analysis and some propositions for the research and policy void. Higher Education Policy, 38(2), 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knight, J. (2007). Cross-border higher education: Issues and implications for quality assurance and accreditation. Higher Education in the World, 134–146.Google Scholar
  26. Lemaitre, M. J. (2002). Quality as politics. Quality in Higher Education, 8(1), 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maldonado-Maldonado, A. (2011). Globalization, a knowledge-based regime and higher education: Where do Mexican universities stand? In R. King, S. Marginson, & N. Rajani (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 324–343). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marginson, S. (2007a). Global position and position taking: The case of Australia. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(5), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marginson, S. (2007b). The new higher education landscape. In S. Marginson (Ed.), Prospects of higher education: Globalization, market, competition, public goods, and the futures of the university (pp. 29–77). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  31. Marginson, S. (2008). Global field and global imagining: Bourdieu and worldwide higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(3), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marginson, S. (2011). Imagining the global. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook of globalization and higher education (pp. 10–39). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Oswald, L. R. (2012). Marketing semiotics: Signs, strategies, and brand value. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Reisberg, L. (2011). Where the quality discussion stands: strategies and ambiguities. In P. Altbach (Ed.), Leadership for world-class universities: Challenges for developing countries (pp. 128–144). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Riesman, D. (1956). Constraint and variety in American education. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousan Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Singh, M. (2010). Quality assurance in higher education: Which pasts to build on, what futures to contemplate? Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Stensaker, B. (2000). Quality as discourse: An analysis of external audit reports in sweden 1995-1998. Tertiary Education and Management, 6(4), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stensaker, B. (2003). Trance, transparency and transformation: The impact of external quality monitoring on higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 9(2), 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stensaker, B. (2007). Quality as fashion: Exploring the translation of a management idea into higher education. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. J. Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 99–118). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stensaker, B. (2008). Outcomes of quality assurance: A discussion of knowledge, methodology and validity. Quality in Higher Education, 14(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2006). Old wine in new bottles? A comparison of public and private accreditation schemes in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 19(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2011). Accountability: Understandings and challenges. In B. Stensaker & L. Harvey (Eds.), Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power (pp. 7–21). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Stensaker, B., Rosa, M. J., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2007). Conclusions and further challenges. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. J. Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 247–262). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Tedlock, B. (2005). The observation of participation and the emergence of public ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 467–481). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Välimaa, J. (2008). Cultural studies in higher education research. In J. Välimaa & O. H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education (pp. 9–25). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vlăsceanu, L., Grünberg, L., & Pârlea, D. (2004). Quality assurance and accreditation: A glossary of basic terms and definitions. Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.Google Scholar
  53. Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  54. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  56. Zumeta, W. (2001). Public policy and accountability in higher education: Lessons from the past and present for the new millennium. In D. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access and accountability (pp. 155–197). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Leadership in EducationUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations