Higher Education

, Volume 69, Issue 2, pp 257–273 | Cite as

Sense of community in academic communities of practice: predictors and effects

  • Nicolae Nistor
  • Irene Daxecker
  • Dorin Stanciu
  • Oliver Diekamp
Article

Abstract

Sense of community (SoC) in communities of practice (CoP) seems to play a similar role to that of group cohesion in small groups: Both sustain participants’ knowledge sharing, which in turn substantiates the socio-cognitive structures that make up the CoP such as scholar identities, practical repertoires in research and teaching or relationships between colleagues. However, empirical evidence of relationships between SoC and other CoP variables is scarce. A correlation study among German and Romanian scholars (N = 136) investigates predictors and effects of the social component of SoC (SoC-S) in academia. A conceptual model is validated, displaying CoP members’ socio-emotional interpersonal knowledge as the strongest predictor of SoC-S and of knowledge sharing acceptance. Further, SoC-S significantly mediates the effect of time and centrality in CoP on knowledge sharing acceptance. The model explains a relatively large part of the variance of SoC-S (27 %) and of knowledge sharing acceptance (33 %). For academic practice, the study emphasizes the importance of SoC and interpersonal knowledge in academic communities as major factors of community building and knowledge sharing motivation.

Keywords

Sense of community Community of practice Socio-emotional interpersonal knowledge Higher education 

References

  1. Adams, S. J., Roch, S. G., & Ayman, R. (2005). Communication medium and member familiarity: The effects on decision time, accuracy, and satisfaction. Small Group Research, 36(3), 321–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2010). Social psychology (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some exploration in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boylan, M. (2010). Ecologies of participation in school classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewe, E., Kramer, L., & Sawtelle, V. (2012). Investigating student communities with network analysis of interactions in a physics learning center. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010101.
  8. Buckley, S., & Du Toit, A. (2010). Academics leave your ivory tower: Form communities of practice. Educational Studies, 36(5), 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chavis, D. M., Hogge, J. H., McMillan, D. W., & Wandersman, A. (1986). Sense of community through Brunswik’s lens: A first look. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communications styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49(2), 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cigognani, E., Palestrini, L., Albanesi, C., & Zani, B. (2012). Social identification and sense of community among members of a cooperative company: The role of perceived organizational values. Journal of Applied Psychology, 42(5), 1088–1113.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47–60). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dawson, S. (2008). A study of the relationship between student social networks and sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 224–238.Google Scholar
  15. Diekamp, O. (2007). Interpersonales Wissen und kooperatives Lernen im virtuellen Seminar [Interpersonal knowledge and cooperative learning in a virtual seminar]. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
  16. Diekamp, O., Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2008). Interpersonal knowledge in virtual seminars. In J. Zumbach, N. Schwartz, T. Seufert, & L. Kester (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: The legacy of competence (pp. 11–19). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dornbusch, F., & Brenner, T. (2013). Universities as local knowledge hubs under different technology regimes. New evidence from academic patenting. Working Papers Firms and Region, No. R6/2013. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, ISI Competence Center “Policy and Regions”. http://www.isi.fhg.de/isi-media/docs/p/de/arbpap_unternehmen_region/ap_r6_2013.pdf.
  19. Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2014). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice—Participation support structures for newcomers in faculty student councils. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–29. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2014.883978
  20. Fischer, F., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (Eds.) (2011). Special Section II: Stretching the limits in help-seeking research: Theoretical, methodological, and technological advances. Learning and Instruction, 21(2):243–299.Google Scholar
  21. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Gourlay, L. (2011). New lecturers and the myth of ‘communities of practice’. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henrich, K. J., & Attebury, R. (2010). Communities of practice at an academic library: A new approach to mentoring at the University of Idaho. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(2), 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill, J. L. (1996). Psychological sense of community: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, F., Finkelstein, M. J., & Rostan, M. (Eds.). (2014). The internationalisation of the academy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2009). Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, H., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Developing situated knowledge about teaching with technology via web-enhanced case-based activity. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1378–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lesser, E. L., & Fontaine, M. A. (2004). Vercoming knowledge barriers with communities of practice: Lessons learned through practical experience. In P. Hildreth & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks. Innovation through communities of practice (pp. 14–23). London: Idea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McMillan, D. W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McMillan, D. W. (2011). Sense of community, a theory not a value: A response to Nowell and Boyd. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(5), 507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nistor, N. & Fischer, F. (2012). Communities of practice in academia: Testing a quantitative model. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(2), 114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.05.005.
  35. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Overbaugh, R. C., & Nickel, C. E. (2011). A comparison of student satisfaction and value of academic community between blended and online sections of a university-level educational foundations course. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 164–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pyhältö, K., Nummenmaa, A. R., Soini, T., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Research on scholarly communities and development of scholarly identity in Finnish doctoral education. In S. Ahola & D. M. Hoffman (Eds.), Higher Education research in Finland. Emerging structures and contemporary issues (pp. 337–357). Jyväskylä: University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Robinson, D., & Wilkinson, D. (1995). Sense of community in a remote mining town: Validating a neighborhood cohesion scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(1), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., & Lucking, R. (2004). The classroom and school community inventory: Development, refinement, and validation of a self-report measure for educational research. Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Royal, M. A., & Rossi, R. J. (1996). Individual-level correlates of sense of community: Findings from workplace and school. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmidt, H., & Moust, J. (2000). Factors affecting small group tutorial learning: A review of research. In D. Evenson & C. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 19–52). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Shacham, M., & Od-Cohen, Y. (2009). Rethinking PhD learning incorporating communities of practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skelton, A. (2012). Teacher identities in a research-led institution: In the ascendancy or on the retreat? British Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weiss, A. (2009). Communities als Speicher und Quelle von Wissen. Eine empirische Untersuchung in der Praxisgemeinschaft der Fernfahrer [Communities as knowledge resource. An empirical study in a truck driver community of practice]. Unpublished M.A. thesis. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Chair of Education and Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
  47. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice, learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: University Press.Google Scholar
  48. West, R. E. (2009). What is shared? A framework for understanding shared innovation within communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(3), 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wombacher, J., Tagg, S. K., Bürgi, T., & MacBryde, J. (2010). Measuring sense of community in the military: Cross-cultural evidence for the validity of the brief sense of community scale and its underlying theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(6), 671–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang, Y. F., Yeh, H. C., & Wong, W. K. (2010). The influence of social interaction on meaning construction in a virtual community. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolae Nistor
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Irene Daxecker
    • 1
  • Dorin Stanciu
    • 4
  • Oliver Diekamp
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesLudwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMunichGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Human SciencesUniversität der BundeswehrNeubibergGermany
  3. 3.Richard W. Riley College of Education and LeadershipWalden UniversityMinneapolisUSA
  4. 4.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesBabeş-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations