Higher Education

, Volume 68, Issue 5, pp 749–771 | Cite as

Transformation of classroom spaces: traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges

Article

Abstract

Educational environment influences students’ learning attitudes, and the classroom conveys the educational philosophy. The traditional college classroom design is based on the educational space that first appeared in medieval universities. Since then classrooms have not changed except in their size. In an attempt to develop a different perspective of educational environment, a new design of classroom, the active learning classroom (ALC), was established at SoongSil University in Korea. Two questionnaire surveys were conducted for diagnosing the educational effects of students’ learning in the ALC and comparing the results with those obtained regarding the traditional classroom. The result proved the existence of a ‘golden zone’ and a ‘shadow zone’ in the traditional classroom, which discriminate students’ learning experiences depending on seating positions. On the contrary, the ALC did not produce such positional discrimination. Students perceived the ALC environment as more inspirational, especially in regards to active class participation. Students with more emphasis on academic achievement showed greater tendency to share information and to create new ideas in the ALC. However, in the traditional classroom setting, only students with high GPAs were more motivated to learn while the gap in learning attitudes was offset in the ALC setting. In-depth discussions about research findings were undertaken and four suggestions were provided in support of school administrators and relevant institutional personnel, faculty members, and researchers for future utilization of the ALC.

Keywords

Classroom design Active learning classroom Classroom effect Higher education 

References

  1. Alexander, D., Cohen, B. A., Fitzgerald, S., Honsey, P., Jorn, L., Knowles, J., Oberg, P., Todd, J., Walker, J. D., & Whiteside, A. (2008). Active learning classrooms pilot evaluation: Fall 2007 findings and recommendations. University of Minnesota. http://www.classroom.umn.edu/projects/alc_report_final.pdf.
  2. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Beichner, R. J., & Saul, J. M. (2003). Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) Project. http://www.ncsu.edu/per/Articles/Varenna_SCALEUP_Paper.pdf.
  4. Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbot, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D. L., Allain, R. J., et al. (2007). Student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. In E. F. Redish & P. J. Cooney (Eds.), Reviews in physics education research (PER), volume 1: Research-based reform in university physics. College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. In J. D. Bransford (Ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carmean, C., & Haefner, J. (2002). Mind over matter: Transforming course management systems into effective learning environments. Educause Review, 37(6), 26–34.Google Scholar
  7. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2004). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Science, 14(2), 243–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college. Change, 30(4), 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Korean Ministry of Education (2011). Acceptance to university’s education capacity building and advancement of college education(ACE) in 2011. http://www.moe.go.kr/web/969/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=78&boardSeq=22918.
  11. Korean Ministry of Education and Korean Council for University (2012a). Acceptance to university’s education capacity building in 2012. http://www.kcue.or.kr/bbs/view.php?gb=news&page=8&idx=291&kind=&culm=&word.
  12. Korean Ministry of Education, and Korean Council for University (2012b). Acceptance to Advancement of College Education (ACE) Project in 2012. http://www.kcue.or.kr/bbs/view.php?gb=news&page=8&idx=298&kind=&culm=&word.
  13. Lee, J. (2012). The efficiency analysis of the brain Korea 21. The Journal of Economics and Finance of Education, 21(1), 125–160.Google Scholar
  14. NLII White Paper (2004). Leading the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. http://www.educause.edu/LibraryDetailPage/666&ID=NLI0447.
  15. Orr, D. W. (1993). Architecture as pedagogy. Conservation Biology, 7(2), 266–228.Google Scholar
  16. Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  17. Park, K. H. (2010). Does the PEUC have influenced on the university’s educational competency? The Journal of Educational Administration, 28(4), 63–82.Google Scholar
  18. Pellathy, S., 7 Leibovich, A. K. (2008). Implementing proven introductory physics reforms. http://scaleup.ncsu.edu/groups/adopters/wiki/15c1e/attachments/ca7e3/BemaStudy.pdf.
  19. Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Song, K. C. (2010). A discussion about enactment plan of ‘Gant Law for Higher Education’. The Journal of Economics and Finance of Education, 19(2), 125–153.Google Scholar
  21. University of Minnesota Active Learning Classrooms Pilot Evaluation Team. (2008). Active learning classrooms pilot evaluation: Fall 2007 findings and recommendations. University of Minnesota. http://www.classroom.umn.edu/projects/alc_report_final.pdf.
  22. Van Horne, S., Murniati, C., & Saichaie, K. (2012). Assessing Teaching and Learning in Technology-Infused TILE Classrooms at the University of Iowa. in EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative’s Seeking Evidence of Impact. http://www.educause.edu/library/resources.
  23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1963). Thought and language. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Walton, W. (1997). Small group methods in medical teaching. Medical Education, 31, 459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weinstein, C. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49(4), 577–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Baird University CollegeSoongSil UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Institute for Whole Person EducationSogang UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations