Skip to main content

Learning from tutorials: a qualitative study of approaches to learning and perceptions of tutorial interaction

Higher Education volume 68, pages 591–606 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

This study examines differences in university students’ approaches to learning when attending tutorials as well as variation in students’ perceptions of tutorials as an educational arena. In-depth qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with undergraduates showed how surface and deep approaches to learning were revealed in the students’ note-taking, listening, and engaging in dialogue. It was also shown how variation in the students’ approaches to learning were coherent with variation in the students’ perceptions of the tutors’ pedagogical role, the value of peer interaction, and the overall purpose of tutorials. The results are discussed regarding the paradox that students relying on surface approaches to learning seemingly are the ones least likely to respond to tutorials in the way they were intended.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Anderson, C. (2005). Enabling and shaping understanding through tutorials. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (3rd ed., pp. 187–197). Edinburgh: Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eley, M. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23(3), 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., Calvo, R., Levy, D., & Tan, K. (2004). Learning through discussions. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(1), 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O’Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face‐to‐face discussion: Conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 22(4), 244–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22(3), 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, A., & Entwistle, N. (1992). Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations. Learning and Instruction, 2(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19(2), 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, V. (1984). Learning from lectures. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (2nd ed., pp. 90–102). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

  • Hounsell, D. (1984). Learning and essay-writing. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (2nd ed., pp. 103–123). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

  • Hounsell, D. (2005). Understanding teaching and teaching for understanding. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (3rd ed., pp. 239–257). Edinburgh: Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Jenkins, W., & Ng, K. (2003). Adult students’ perceptions of good teaching as a function of their conceptions of learning—Part 1. Influencing the development of self-determination. Studies in Continuing Education, 25(2), 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1984). Learning from problem-solving. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (2nd ed., pp. 124–143). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

  • Lea, S., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes to student-centred learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’? Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K., & Ahola, K. (1995). Activating instruction: How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(4), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K., Sharafi, P., Karlgren, K., Masiello, I., Nieminen, J., Birgegaard, G., et al. (2008). MED NORD—A tool for measuring medical students’ well-being and study orientations. Medical Teacher, 30(1), 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning: II—Outcome as a function of the learners conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (2005). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (3rd ed., pp. 39–58). Edinburgh: Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune, V. (2004). Development of first-year students’ conceptions of essay writing. Higher Education, 47(3), 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (2005). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litamen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching–learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: Constructivism and social learning. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocca, K. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 357–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermetten, Y., Vermunt, J., & Lodewijks, H. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12(3), 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to warmly thank Dr. Velda McCune, Dr. Noel Entwistle, and Dr. Charles Anderson for advice on this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Teaching and Learning, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210, Aarhus, Denmark

    Kim Jesper Herrmann

Authors
  1. Kim Jesper Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Jesper Herrmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrmann, K.J. Learning from tutorials: a qualitative study of approaches to learning and perceptions of tutorial interaction. High Educ 68, 591–606 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9731-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9731-3

Keywords

  • Approaches to learning
  • Learning environments
  • Tutorials
  • Students’ perceptions