Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 369–380 | Cite as

Challenges and trends in comparative higher education: an editorial

  • Anna Kosmützky
  • Terhi NokkalaEmail author
Article

Introduction

International comparative higher education research has proliferated since its institutionalization as an interdisciplinary field in the 1960s and 1970s (Jarausch 1985) and has gained special momentum in the 1990s (Teichler 1996). On the one hand, the benefits of comparative research approaches in international higher education have been repeatedly emphasized (Altbach and Kelly 1985; Teichler 1996; Rhoades 2001). These include, for example, increasing the capacity to generalize about a greater number of units under analysis, the capacity of a systematic comparison to illuminate the dynamics of a particular system better than a single-system study as well as highlighting knowledge gaps. On the other hand, methodological debates about comparing higher education internationally and how best to compare them emerged hand-in-hand with the field’s growth in popularity. Although the logic of international comparative research does not differ from research undertaken just within...

Keywords

High Education Comparative Research High Education System High Education Research Comparative Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Altbach, P. G., & Kelly, D. H. (1985). Higher education in international perspective: A survey and bibliography. London; New York: Mansell Pub.Google Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M. (2003). Methodology for close up studies—struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education, 46, 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bleiklie, I. (2013). Comparing university organizations across boundaries. Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9683-z
  4. Chernilo, D. (2007). A social theory of the nation state: The political forms of modernity beyond methodological nationalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, B.R. (1996). Substantive growth and innovative organization: New categories for higher education research. Higher Education. 32: 417–430.Google Scholar
  7. Cowen, R., & Kazamias, A. M. (2009). International handbook of comparative education. Dordecht; London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Dale*, R. (2005). Globalisation, knowledge economy and comparative education. Comparative Education, 41(2), 117–149. doi: 10.1080/03050060500150906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dey, E. L. (1997). Working with low survey response rates: The efficacy of weighting adjustments. Research in Higher Education, 38(2), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Djelic, M. L., & Quack, S. (2003). Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. Cheltenham, UK; Northhampton, MA: E. Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (2004). Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goedebuure, L., & van Vught, F. (1996). Comparative higher education studies: The perspective from the policy Sciences. Higher Education, 32(4), 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hantrais, L. (2009). International comparative research: Theory, methods and practice. Basingstoke, England; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Held, D., & McGrew, A. G. (2007). Globalization theory: Approaches and controversies. Cambridge; Malden, Mass: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman, D., Blasi, B., Ćulum, B., Dragšić, Z., Ewen, A., Horta, H., Nokkala, T., Rios-Aguilar, C. (2013). The methodological illumination of a blind spot: information and communication technology and international research team dynamics in a higher education research program. Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9692-y
  17. Horta, H., & Jung, J. (2013). Higher education research in Asia: A scientometric perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(4), 398–419. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12015
  18. Jarausch, K. H. (1985). Comparing higher education—historically? History of Education Quarterly, 25(1/2), 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly, G. P., & Altbach, P. G. (1986). Comparative education: Challenge and response. Comparative Education Review, 30(1), 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kogan, M. (1996). Comparing higher education systems. Higher Education, 32, 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kogan, M., Bleiklie, I., Henkel, M., & Kogan, M. (Eds.). (2000). Transforming higher education: A comparative study. London; Philadelphia: J. Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Krücken, G., Kosmützky, A., & Torka, M. (2007). Towards a multiversity?: Universities between global trends and national traditions. Bielefeld; Piscataway, NJ: Transcript; Distributed in North America by Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Kuzhabekova, A., Hendel, D. D., & Chapman, D. (2012). Mapping global research on international higher education. ASHE Conference 2012, Las Vergas.Google Scholar
  24. Marginson, S. (2011). Introduction to part I. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 3–9). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Metcalfe, A. S. (2012). Imag(in)ing the university: Visual sociology and higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 35(4), 517–534. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2012.0028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neave, G. (1996). Higher education policy as an exercise in contemporary history. Higher education. Higher Education, 32(4), 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nokkala, T. (2014). National stories, convergent trends and divergent paths—knowledge society and higher education discourse. In J. Välimaa, & D. Hoffman (Eds.), Change in networks, higher education and knowledge societies. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Page, E. C. (1995) Comparative public administration in Britain. Public Administration, 73(1), 123–141.Google Scholar
  30. Rhoades, G. (2001). Introduction to the special section: “perspectives on comparative higher education”. Higher Education, 41, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rhoades, G. (2002). Globally, nationally, and locally patterned changes in higher education. Higher Education, 43(3), 279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scott, P. (2011). The university as a global institution. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 59–75). Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (USA): Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Shahjahan, R. A., & Kezar, A. J. (2013). Beyond the “National Container”: Addressing methodological nationalism in higher education research. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Skocpol, T. (1980). Emerging agendas and recurrent strategies in historical sociology. In T. Skocpol (Ed.), Vision and method in historical sociology (pp. 356–391). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Slaughter, S. (2001). Problems in comparative higher education: Political economy, political sociology and postmodernism. Higher Education, 41(4), 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smelser, N. (1976/2013). Comparative methods in the social sciences. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.Google Scholar
  37. Stromquist, N. P. (2001). Gender studies: A global perspective of their evolution contribution, and challenges to comparative higher education. Higher Education, 41(4), 372–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Teichler, U. (1996). Comparative higher education: Potentials and limits. Higher Education, 32(4), 431–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tierney, W. G. (2001). The autonomy of knowledge and the decline of the subject: Postmodernism and the reformulation of the university. Higher Education, 41(4), 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tight, M. (2012). Researching higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2007). The future of Finnish higher education challenged by global competitive horizons. In S. Marginson (Ed.), Prospects of higher education: Globalization, market competition, public goods and the future of the university (pp. 185–200). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KasselKasselGermany
  2. 2.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations