Skip to main content

Why not? Examining college students’ reasons for avoiding an online course

Abstract

A large number of studies have compared learning outcomes in fully online courses to those in face-to-face courses. Fewer studies have examined why students choose to enrol in fully online courses to begin with, and no study has yet addressed the question of why some students choose not to register in online courses. This study contributes to scholarly understanding of online education by examining for the first time why students may choose to take a large lecture course face-to-face, when they know that the same course is offered by their institution online in the same semester, for the same credit and at the same tuition cost. Through a survey, 48 students in a face-to-face offering of an introductory Educational Psychology course reported why they chose to attend lectures and tutorials in person when they could have earned the same credit without doing so. A majority of respondents suggested that they believed they would learn better face-to-face, and expressed informal theories about why this would be the case. We examine these informal theories, and the possible implications they may have for future research and institutional planning with regard to online course offerings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf.

  • Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Beyond grades in online learning: Adaptive profiles of academic selfregulation among naval academy undergraduates. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(4), 568–601.

  • Babad, E., & Tayeb, A. (2003). Experimental analysis of students’ course selection. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 373–393.

  • Bassili, J. N. (2008). Motivation and cognitive strategies in the choice to attend lectures or watch them online. Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 129–148.

  • Bol, L., & Garner, J. K. (2011). Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23, 104–123.

  • Braun, T. (2008). Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L. M. (2012). Online learning: A comparison of web-based and land-based courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39–A41.

  • Chen, B. (2009). Barriers to adoption of technology-mediated distance education in higher-education institutions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(4), 333–338.

  • Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Forgotten alumni: Online learners as donors. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(1), 43–47.

  • Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning and Technology, 10(1), 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaier, S. (2005). Alumni satisfaction with their undergraduate academic experience and the impact on alumni giving and participation. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 5(4), 279–288.

  • Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2005). ‘Distance education’ and ‘e-learning’: Not the same thing. Higher Education, 49, 467–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, M., St. George, A., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining motivation in online distance learning environments: Complex, multifaceted, and situation-dependent. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), 20–37.

  • Hixon, E., Buckenmeyer, J., Barczyk, C., Feldman, L., & Zamojski, H. (2012). Beyond the early adopters of online instruction: Motivating the reluctant majority. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 102–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, H. F., Ponton, M. K., & Rovai, A. P. (2007). A comparison of student evaluations of teaching between online and face-to-face courses. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 89–101.

  • Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research & Development, 59, 593–618.

  • Liu, Y., Su, Y., Xu, G., & Chan, R. C. K. (2007). Two dissociable aspects of feeling-of-knowing: Knowing that you know and knowing that you do not know. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(5), 672–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, Y., Bernard, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: A theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(2), 141–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazoué, J. G. (2012). The deconstructed campus. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 74–95.

  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. J., & Keen, C. (2006). The Axiomatic trap: Stultifying myths in distance education. Higher Education, 52, 283–301.

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9(5).

  • Probasco, J. (1991). Crumbling campuses: What are the real costs? NACUBO Business Officer, 25(5), 36–41.

  • Roblyer, M. D. (1999). Is choice important in distance learning? A study of student motives for taking Internet-based courses at the high school and community college levels. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 157–171.

  • Shrock, S. (2012). A reaction to Mazoue’s deconstructed campus. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 104–118.

  • Simpson, O. (2004). The impact on retention of interventions to support distance learning students. Open Learning, 19(1), 79–95.

  • Tyler-Smith, K. (2006). Early attrition among first time eLearners: A review of factors that contribute to drop-out, withdrawal and non-completion rates of adult learners undertaking eLearning programmes. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(2).

  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 227–304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated Learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

  • Zocco, D. (2009). Risk theory and student course selection. Research in Higher Education Journal, 3, 1–29.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Kevin O’Neill.

Appendix : Student survey

Appendix : Student survey

How did you get to campus today? (choose one)

  • Drove by myself in a car

  • Shared a ride with one or more other people

  • Took transit (bus/train)

  • Walked/cycled

How many minutes (approximately) did it take you to get to campus? ______

Why did you decide to take the face-to-face (not online) version of this course (check all that apply)?

  • Didn’t realize I could take it online

  • Online version was full

  • Don’t like online courses

  • Find online courses more difficult than face-to-face courses

  • Thought I would learn more in this version

  • Thought I would get a better grade in this version

  • Wanted to minimize my effort in this course

  • Other

  • ________________________________________________________

If you like, offer any comments you like on your choice of the face-to-face course?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Neill, D.K., Sai, T.H. Why not? Examining college students’ reasons for avoiding an online course. High Educ 68, 1–14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9663-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9663-3

Keywords

  • Survey
  • Course selection
  • Lecture
  • Face-to-face
  • Online
  • Risk