Skip to main content
Log in

Socialization to interdisciplinarity: faculty and student perspectives

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Socialization has become a common framework through which to understand the doctoral student experience; however, the framework has predominately been used as a lens through which to understand traditional, single-discipline doctoral student experiences. Interdisciplinary doctoral programs are becoming increasingly common in both the United States and elsewhere but relatively little empirical research exists about this distinct experience. Through multiple interviews with 18 doctoral students and their 35 faculty members, we discuss differences in the socialization process for these students in regard to knowledge acquisition, investment, and involvement. Implications for practice and future research are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amey, M. J., & Brown, D. F. (2004). Breaking out of the box: Interdisciplinary collaboration and faculty work. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J. S. (2002). Reexamining doctoral student socialization and professional development: Moving beyond the congruence and assimilation orientation. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVII, pp. 349–380). New York, NY: Agathon Press.

  • Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, D., Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2011). Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. Higher Education, 62, 741–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrego, M., & Cutler, S. (2010). Constructive alignment of interdisciplinary graduate curriculum in engineering and science: An analysis of successful IGERT proposals. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Graduate Schools. (2004). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Policy, numbers, leadership, and next steps. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.

  • Gardner, S. K. (2007). I heard it through the grapevine: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 54, 723–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2009). Doctoral student development: Phases of challenge and support. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2012). A jack of all trades and a master of some of them: Successful students in interdisciplinary Ph.D. programs. Issues in Integrative Studies, 29, 84–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: Explaining first-year doctoral attrition. In M. S. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (pp. 55–64). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, K. (2009). Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, K. (2010). Doctoral student socialization in interdisciplinary fields. In S. K. Gardner & P. Mendoza (Eds.), On becoming a scholar (pp. 97–112). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitskaya, L., Clark, D., Montgomery, G., & Primeau, R. (2002). Interdisciplinary learning: Process and outcomes. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2010). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, S. K., & Gardner, S. K. (2012). Interdisciplinary collaboration on your campus: Five questions. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(6), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, M. H. (2001). Intellectual border crossing in graduate education: A report from the field. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mix, M. C. (1971). Toward a theory of socialization into the academic profession. doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.

  • National Science Foundation. (2007). NSF: IGERT national recruitment program. http://www.igert.org/index.asp. Accessed 24 Jan 2008.

  • National Science Foundation. (2009). Interdisciplinary research. http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503439&org=NSF&sel_org=NSF&from=fund. Accessed 8 Dec 2009.

  • Repko, A. F. (2012). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strober, M. H. (n.d.). Habits of the mind: Challenges for multidisciplinary engagement. http://www.stanford.edu/~myras/challenges.pdf. Accessed 18 March 2010.

  • Thornton, R., & Nardi, P. M. (1975). The dynamics of role acquisition. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 870–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational socialization in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 68, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1994). Enhancing promotion, tenure and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process. Washington, DC: George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Doctor’s degrees conferred by degree-granting institutions, by field of study: Selected years, 1970 through 2009. Washingotn, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1978). People processing: Strategies of organizational socialization. Organizational Dynamics, 7, 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1984). Doing new things in old ways: The chains of socialization. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), College and university organization: Insights from the behavioral sciences (pp. 211–247). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by National Science Foundation award EPS-0904155.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan K. Gardner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gardner, S.K., Jansujwicz, J.S., Hutchins, K. et al. Socialization to interdisciplinarity: faculty and student perspectives. High Educ 67, 255–271 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9648-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9648-2

Keywords

Navigation