Research staff and public engagement: a UK study
- 586 Downloads
Public engagement plays an important role in the contemporary UK academy, and is promoted through initiatives such as Beacons of Public Engagement and research grant ‘Pathways to Impact’. Relatively little is known, however, about academic experiences of such engagement activities. This study focuses on one staff group, contract researchers, to explore the perceived challenges and opportunities of public engagement. Qualitative and quantitative data—from a web-based survey and three focus groups—are used to show that, while engagement activities are often seen as rewarding, the challenges involved in participating in them are profound. While researchers report practical needs, such as for logistical support or communication training, key barriers relate to the conditions of contract research more generally, and specifically to job insecurity, transiency, and lack of autonomy.
KeywordsContract research staff Public engagement Mixed methods research UK
- Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Hughes, A., & Kitson, M. (2009). Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors. Cambridge: Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Bryson, C. (1999). Contract research: The failure to address the real issues. Higher Education Review, 31(2), 29–49.Google Scholar
- Burchell, K., Franklin, S., & Holden, K. (2009). Public culture as professional science: Final report of the ScoPE project (scientists on public engagement: From communication to deliberation). London: LSE.Google Scholar
- Chilvers, J., & Macnaghten, P. (2011). Science, trust and public engagement. A literature review for the BIS/Sciencewise-ERC “Science, Trust and Public Engagement” project. BIS/Sciencewise-ERC.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Beverly Hills: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Davies, S. R. (2013). Constituting public engagement: Meanings and genealogies of PEST in two U.K. studies. Science Communication. doi:10.1177/1075547013478203.
- Duncan, S., & Spicer, S. (2010). The engaging researcher: Inspiring people to engage with your research. Cambridge: Careers Research and Advisory Centre.Google Scholar
- Holliman, R., Whitelegg, E., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2009). Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, T., Fuller, A., Bishop, D., Felstead, A., Jewson, N., Kakavelakis, K., et al. (2006). Reconfiguring contract research? Career, work and learning in a changing employment landscape. UK: In Brighton.Google Scholar
- McCallie, E., Bell, L., Lohwater, T., Falk, J., Lehr, J. L., Lewenstein, B. V., et al. (2009). Many experts, many audiences: Public engagement with science and informal science education. A CAISE inquiry group report. Washington DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).Google Scholar
- Mellors-Bourne, R., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Careers in research online survey (CROS) 2009: Analysis of aggregated UK results. Cambridge: Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited.Google Scholar
- NCCPE. (2011). “National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Website.” http://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/.
- Oliver, L., & Ackers, H. L. (2005). Fixed term positions in the academic career trajectory. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
- RCUK. (2010). Concordat for engaging the public with research. Swindon: RCUK. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/per/Pages/Concordat.aspx.
- Science for All Expert Group. (2010). Science for all: Report and action plan from the science for all expert group. London: BIS.Google Scholar
- Shelton, N., Laoire, C. N., Fielding, S., Harvey, D. C., Pelling, M., & Duke-Williams, O. (2001). Working at the coalface: Contract staff, academic initiation and the RAE. Area, 33(4), 434–439.Google Scholar
- Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Society, R. (2006). Survey of factors affecting science communication: Conclusions, recommendations and actions. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
- Turney, J. (2006). Engaging science: Thoughts, deeds, analysis and action. London: Wellcome Trust.Google Scholar