Higher Education

, Volume 66, Issue 5, pp 603–618 | Cite as

Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: a framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making

Article

Abstract

This article critically examines existing models and different ways of understanding undergraduate research to argue that there is a need for a coherent framework for student research that can contribute to curricular and pedagogical decision-making. A framework derived from analysing and integrating models of undergraduate research within the literature and from investigation in different countries is presented and explained. This framework graphically highlights the curricular and pedagogical choices involved where it is intended to engage students in research and inquiry. The article then indicates how it has been and can be used and discusses implications for research and practice.

Keywords

Curriculum Pedagogy Inquiry-based learning Research-based learning 

References

  1. Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham: Open University Press and Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the University: In an age of super-complexity. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beckman, M., & Hensel, N. (2009). Making explicit the implicit: Defining undergraduate research. CUR Quarterly, 4, 40–44.Google Scholar
  5. Boud, D., & Feletti, G. I. (1997). The challenge of problem-based learning (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, M. K., & Wesemann, J. L. (2009). Broadening participation in undergraduate research: Fostering excellence and enhancing the impact. Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
  7. Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Brew, A. (2010). An Australian perspective on undergraduate research. CUR Quarterly, 31(1), 37–42.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, H. (2006). Turning an undergraduate class into a professional research community. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 387–394.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, H., & Jackson, C., undergraduate students at University College London. (2009). An element of controversy: The life of chlorine in science, technology and war. London: British Society for the History of Science.Google Scholar
  11. Cuthbert, D., Arunachalam, D., & Licina, D. (2011). ‘It feels more important than other classes I have done’: An˙authentic undergraduate research experience in sociology. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desai, K. V., Gatson, S. N., Stiles, T. W., Stewart, R. H., Laine, G. A., & Quick, C. M. (2008). Integrating research and education at research-extensive universities with research-intensive communities. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(2), 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elsen, G. M. F., Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., van der Rijst, R. M., & van Driel, J. H. (2009). How to strengthen the connection between research and teaching in undergraduate University education. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(1), 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garde-Hansen, J., & Calvert, B. (2007). Developing a research culture in the undergraduate curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world: How globalisation is reshaping our lives. London: Profile books.Google Scholar
  16. Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  18. Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2010). Linking Teaching and Research through Engaging Students in Research and Inquiry: International Perspectives. International perspectives on undergraduate research and inquiry: A scholarly discussion (p. Accessed 27 February 2012 from: http://www.cur.org/issotl/2010/materials.html). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
  19. Higgs, B. (2010). Embedding research into undergraduate curricula in Ireland and the need for a mapping exercise. Poster presented at International perspectives on undergraduate research and inquiry: A scholarly discussion (p. Accessed 12 January 2012 from: http://www.cur.org/issotl/2010/materials.html). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
  20. Jenkins, A., Blackman, T., Lindsay, R., & Paton-Saltzberg, R. (1998). Teaching and Research: student perspectives and policy implications. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2,), 127-141.Google Scholar
  21. Karukstis, K. K., & Elgren, T. E. (2007). Developing and sustaining a research-supportive curriculum: A compendium of successful practices. Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
  22. Kellett, M. (2010). Rethinking children and research: Attitudes in contemporary society. London and NY: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Knight, P. (2001). Complexity and curriculum: A process approach to curriculum-making. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  25. Laursen, S., Hunter, A.-B., Seymour, E., Thiry, H., & Melton, G. (Eds.). (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: Engaging students in real science. New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. (2012). How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning? Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lopatto, D. (2009). Science in solution: The impact of undergraduate research on student learning. Tucson: Research Corporation for Science Advancement.Google Scholar
  28. Mabrouk, P. A. (2009). Survey study investigating the significance of conference participation to undergraduate research students. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(11), 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLinden, M., & Edwards, C. (2011). Developing a culture of enquiry-based, independent learning in a research-led institution: Findings from a survey of pedagogic practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer, J. H. F., Shanahan, M. P., & Laugksch, R. (2005). Students’ conceptions of research: I—a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murtonen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2009). Learning to be a researcher : Challenges for undergraduates. In A. Brew & L. Lucas (Eds.), Academic research and researchers (pp. 175–188). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill, society for research into higher education and the Open University press.Google Scholar
  32. Neary, M. (2010). Student as producer: Pedagogy for the Avant Garde. Learning Exchange, 1(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  33. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Roberts, A. J., Robbins, J., McLandsborough, L., & Wiedmann, M. (2010). A 10-Year review of the food science summer scholars program: A model for research training and for recruiting undergraduate students into graduate programs and careers in food science. Journal of Food Science Education, 9(4), 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robertson, J., & Blackler, G. (2006). Students’ experiences of learning in a research environment. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(3), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shaffer, C. D., Alvarez, C., Bailey, C., et al. (2010). The genomics education partnership: Successful integration of research into laboratory classes at a diverse group of undergraduate institutions. Life Sciences Education, 9(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spronken-Smith, R. A., Brodeur, J. J., Kajaks, T., Luck, M., Myatt, P., Verburgh, A., Walkington, H., & Wuetherick, B. (submitted for publication). Completing the Research Cycle: A Framework for Promoting Dissemination of Undergraduate Research and Inquiry.Google Scholar
  39. Steinberg, S. R., & Kincheloe, J. L. (1998). Students as researchers: Creating classrooms that matter. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  40. Strayhorn, T. L. (2010). Undergraduate research participation and STEM graduate degree aspirations among students of color. New Directions for Institutional Research Special Issue: Students of Color in STEM, 2010(48), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner, N., Wuetherick, B., & Healey, M. (2008). International perspectives on student awareness, experiences and perceptions of research: Implications for academic developers in implementing research-based teaching and learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 13(3), 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner, C., Garner, M., & Kawilich, B. (2011). The state of the art of teaching research methods in the social sicences: Towards a pedagogical culture. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2006) The Research Skill Development Framework [Web Page]. URL http://www.adelaide.edu.au/clpd/rsd/framework [2011, November 4].
  44. Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(4), 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson, A., Howitt, S., Wilson, D., & Roberts, P. (2011). Academics’ perceptions of the purpose of undergraduate research experiences in a research-intensive degree. Studies in Higher Education, iFirst.Google Scholar
  46. Zamorski, B. (2002). Research-led teaching and learning in higher education a case. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(4), 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations