Abstract
The aim of the current investigation was to provide an insight into how new lecturers in higher education develop as teachers and to identify some of the main influences upon this development. A qualitative, longitudinal design with three semi-structured interviews over a 2-year period was employed with eleven new teachers from a range of higher education institutions and settings. The analysis used case studies, alongside a thematic analysis, to provide fine-grained and idiosyncratic insights into the teachers’ development. The principal finding from the current study was the identification that instances of interactions with students, acted as a core influence upon the new teachers’ development. These instances appeared to provide the teachers with richer and fuller feedback about their teaching. This feedback supported their reflection and influenced the way in which they thought about teaching. Based on these findings it is suggested that teacher development could be enhanced by focussing upon specific instances of interactions with students as these instances provide specific and tangible moments that allow individuals to reflect upon and discuss their conceptions of teaching.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åkerlind, G. (2003). Growing and developing as a university teacher—variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 375–390.
Åkerlind, G. S. (2007). Constraints on academics’ potential for developing as a teacher. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 21–37.
Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
Clarke, G., Blumhof, J., Healey, M., Gravestock, P., Jenkins, A., Honeybone, A., et al. (2002). Developing new lecturers. The case of a discipline—based workshop. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3, 128–144.
Devlin, M. (2003). A solution-focused model for improving individual university teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 8, 77–89.
Devlin, M. (2006). Challenging accepted wisdom about the place of conceptions of teaching in university teaching improvement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18, 112–119.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Building theories from case study research. In M. A. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion. London: Sage.
Entwistle, N., & Walker, P. (2000). Strategic alertness and expanded awareness within sophisticated conceptions of teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 335–361.
Fuller, F. (1970). Personalized education for teachers: An introduction for teacher educators. Austin: R & D Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas.
Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87–100.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, Illinois: Aldine.
Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 20–33.
Hativa, N. (2000). Becoming a better teacher: A case of changing the pedagogical knowledge and beliefs of law professors. Instructional Science, 28, 491–523.
Ho, A. S. P., Watkins, D., & Kelly, M. (2001). The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning. Higher Education, 42, 143–169.
Hounsell, D. (2009). Evaluating courses and teaching. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (3rd ed., pp. P198–P213). London: Routledge.
Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 255–275.
Light, A., & Calkins, S. (2008). The experience of faculty development: Patterns of variation in conceptions of teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 13, 27–40.
Martin, E., & Lueckenhausen, G. (2005). How university teaching changes teachers: Affective as well as cognitive challenges. Higher Education, 49, 389–412.
Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (1992). An expanding awareness: How lecturers change their understanding of teaching. Research and Development in Higher Education, 15, 148–155.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McAlpine, L., & Weston, C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. Instructional Science, 28, 363–385.
McAlpine, L., Weston, C., Beauchamp, J., Wiseman, C., & Beauchamp, C. (1999). Building a metacognitive model of reflection. Higher Education, 37, 105–131.
McKenzie, J. (1999). Changing teachers’ ways of experiencing teaching and ways if experiencing teaching change: How do they relate and what are the implications? In The Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia annual international conference, Melbourne, July 12–15, 1999.
McKenzie, J. (2002). Variation and relevance structures for university teachers’ learning: Bringing about change in ways of experiencing teaching, research and development. Research and Development in Higher Education, 25, 434–441.
McLean, M., & Bullard, J. (2000). Becoming a university teacher: Evidence from teaching portfolios (how academics learn to teach). Teacher Development, 4, 79–101.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Nyquist, J. D., & Wulff, D. H. (1996). Working effectively with graduate assistants. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Pickering, A. (2006). Learning about university teaching: Reflections on a research study investigating influences for change. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 319–335.
Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education., 23, 557–571.
Pratt, D. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 42, 203–220.
Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–111.
Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299–325.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Stenhouse, L. (1988). Case study methods. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology, and measurement: an international handbook (1st ed.). Oxford: Pergamon.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275–284.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75–84.
Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 523–536.
Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research. London: Sage.
Acknowledgments
Thanks must go to Prof. Dai Hounsell, Teaching Leaning and Assessment Centre at Edinburgh University and Dr. Velda McCune, Learning and Teaching Centre, University of Glasgow, for their assistance with the data analysis and helpful comment on drafts of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadler, I. The influence of interactions with students for the development of new academics as teachers in higher education. High Educ 64, 147–160 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9545-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9545-0