Higher Education

, Volume 65, Issue 2, pp 265–276 | Cite as

The identification of threshold concepts: a review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges

Article

Abstract

While the study of threshold concepts is a growing area of research, their identification has not proven to be an easy process. However, identification matters because of the potential impact of threshold concepts on the learning experiences of students. A dialogue amongst lecturers and/or students is common to the literature on identification of threshold concepts. This dialogue, with the inclusion of educational developers, has been called ‘transactional curriculum inquiry’ (Cousin in Researching learning in higher education, Routledge, New York, 2009). Diverse methods across a variety of disciplines have explored the identification of threshold concepts, including semi-structured interviews, analysis of exam responses and observation of classroom behaviour. A selection of these methods and disciplines is discussed in order to highlight two main challenges inherent in the identification process: first, the involvement of the wider professional and/or public community, and second, a lack of agreement amongst research participants about the threshold concepts within disciplines. This paper proposes that the transactional curriculum inquiry process should be extended to involve parties beyond the educational realm (e.g. the professional community) and that the use of consensus methodology offers the potential to facilitate agreement across the transactional process.

Keywords

Threshold concepts Curriculum development Transactional curriculum inquiry 

References

  1. Akerlind, G., Carr-Gregg, S., Field, R., Houston, L., Jones, J., Lupton, M., et al. (2010 June). A threshold concepts focus to first year law curriculum design: supporting student learning using variation theory. Paper presented at 13th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  2. Atherton, J., Hadfield, P., & Meyers, R. (2008 June). Threshold concepts in the wild. Expanded version of a paper presented at Threshold Concepts: From Theory to Practice Conference, Kingston Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Cartensen, A.-K., & Bernhard, J. (2008). Threshold concepts and keys to the portal of understanding. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 143–154). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Clouder, L. (2005). Caring as a ‘threshold concept’: Transforming students in higher education into health(care) professionals. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet, 17, 4–5.Google Scholar
  6. Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, P. (2003 August). Threshold concepts: How can we recognise them? Paper presented at the European Association in Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Conference, Padova.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, P., & Mangan, J. (2005 August). Recognising threshold concepts: An exploration of different approaches. Paper presented at the European Association in Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Conference, Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, P. & Mangan, J. (2006a August–September). Embedding threshold concepts: From theory to pedagogical principles to learning activities. Paper presented at the Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines Symposium, Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, P. & Mangan, J. (2006b December). Trajectories of students’ learning: Threshold concepts and subject learning careers. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Research in Higher Education, Brighton, England.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, P., & Mangan, J. (2007). Threshold concepts and the integration of understanding in economics. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 711–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Entwhistle, N. (2003). Concepts and conceptual frameworks underpinning the ETL project. ETL Project Occasional Report 3. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  13. Foley, B. (2011 October). Threshold concepts in disciplinary settings. Paper presented at the Threshold Concepts Symposium, Cork, Ireland.Google Scholar
  14. Holloway, M., Alpay, E., & Bull, A. (2009). A quantitative approach to identifying threshold concepts in engineering education. Retrieved 1st April, 2012 from http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/scholarart/ee2010/101_GP_Holloway.pdf.
  15. Irvine, N., & Carmichael, P. (2009). Threshold concepts: A point of focus for practitioner research. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, J., & Hunter, D. (1995). Qualitative research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal, 311, 376–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Land, R. (2011 October). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Paper presented at the Threshold Concepts Symposium, Cork, Ireland.Google Scholar
  18. Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F., & Smith, J. (2006). Implications of threshold concepts for course design and evaluation. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 195–206). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Lucas, U., & Mladenovic, R. (2007). The potential of threshold concepts: an emerging framework for educational research and practice. London Review of Education, 5(3), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Male, S. A., & Baillie, C. A. (2011a September). Engineering threshold concepts. Paper presented at 1st World Engineering Education Flash Week, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  21. Male, S. A., & Baillie, C. A. (2011b October). Threshold capabilities: An emerging methodology to locate curricula thresholds. Paper presented at Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. ETL Project Occasional Report 4. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Middendorf, J. (2004). Facilitating a faculty learning community using the decoding the disciplines model. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 98, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Donnell, R. (2010). A critique of the threshold concept hypothesis and an application in economics working paper 164. Retrieved 29th June, 2011 from http://www.finance.uts.edu.au/research/wpapers/wp164.pdf.
  26. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rodger, S., & Turpin, M. (2011 July). Using threshold concepts to transform entry level curricula. Paper presented at Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, Inc Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Rowbottom, D. P. (2007). Demystifying threshold concepts. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(2), 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tanner, B. (2011). Threshold concepts in practice education: Perceptions of practice educators. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(9), 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, C. (2006). Threshold concepts in biology do they fit the definition? In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 87–99). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Taylor, C. E. (2008). Threshold concepts, troublesome knowledge and ways of thinking and practising. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 185–195). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, A., Akerlind, G., Francis, P., Kirkup, L., McKenzie, J., Pearce, D. et al. (2010 September–October). Measurement uncertainty as a threshold concept in physics. Paper presented at 16th UniServe Science Annual Conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  34. Zander, C., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Mostrom, J. E., Ratcliffe, M., et al. (2008). Threshold concepts in computer science: A multi-national empirical investigation. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 105–118). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysiotherapyLa Trobe UniversityBundooraAustralia

Personalised recommendations