Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mutual recognition of quality assurance decisions on higher education institutions in three regions: a lesson for Asia

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cross-border higher education resulting in the increased mobility of students, academic staff, programs, institutions and professionals has grown considerably in global times. Therefore, how to ensure that the quality of academic programs has met the local and international standards simultaneously has become a great challenge in many nations. In recent years, the need for close cooperation of quality assurance agencies and acceptance of review decisions called “Mutual recognition” has been promoted by several international quality assurance networks of higher education, Established in 2003, the European Consortium for Accreditation in higher education (ECA), which aims to achieve mutual recognition of accreditation decisions among member countries, is the first such initiative in the world. The main purpose of the paper is to understand the definition of mutual recognition, examine the role of the international quality assurance network in the promotion of mutual recognition and analzye the ECA, ARCU-SUR, and Asia–Pacific Quality Network cases. The implication of mutual recognition for higher education quality assurance of Asian nations and related issues derived from other regions will be discussed in the conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aelterman, G. (2008). Mutual observation: The experiences of PKA and NVAO. In European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (Ed.), The benefit of mutual recognition of accreditation and quality assurance (pp. 7–10). The Hague: European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education.

  • Asia-Pacific Quality Network (APQN). (2010a). Mutual recognition of quality assurance outcomes. Retrieved Feb. 1, 2011, from http://www.apqn.org/.

  • Asia-Pacific Quality Network (APQN). (2010b). Official Website. Retrieved Oct. 1, 2010, from http://www.apqn.org/.

  • Asia-Pacific Quality Network (APQN). (2012). 2011 annual report. Shanghai: APQN.

  • Beccari, L., & Remaud, B. (2008). In European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (Ed.), The benefit of mutual recognition of accreditation and quality assurance (pp. 11–12). The Hague: European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education.

  • Cameron, J. (2012). Personal communication. New Zealand: NZUAAU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chueng, P. (2008). The Asian-Pacific perspective. In European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (Ed.), The benefit of mutual recognition of accreditation and quality assurance (pp. 36–37). The Hague: European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education.

  • Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). (2010). Quality review 2009:CHEA almanac of external quality review. Washington, D.C.: CHEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. B. (2010). Personal communication. Thailand: ONESQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. (2002). International quality review and accreditation: The role of U.S. recognized accrediting organizations. Retrieved Nov. 12, 2009, from http://www.chea.org/international/index.asp.

  • Eaton, J. (2003). Accreditation and recognition in the United States. Retrieved Nov. 11, 2011, from http://www.chea.org/international/OECD_JEPaper_0803.pdf.

  • ENIC/NARIC Network. (2012). Official website. Retrieved March 8, from http://www.enic-naric.net/index.aspx?s=n&r=g&d=about#ENIC.

  • EQAR. (2012). Official website. Retrieved March 8, from http://www.eqar.eu/.

  • Europa. (2005). What is Erasmus? Retrieved Dec. 20, 2010, from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/socrates/erasmus/what_en.html.

  • European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2007). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Helsinki.

  • European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2011). Website. Retrieved Oct. 1, 2011, from http://www.enqa.org/.

  • European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (ECA). (2004). Code of Good Practice for the Members of the European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (ECA). The Hague: ECA.

  • European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (ECA). (2007). Advancing mutual recognition of accreditation decisions. The Hague: ECA.

  • European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (ECA). (2008). The benefit of mutual recognition of accreditation and quality assurance decisions. The Hague: ECA.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (ECA). (2011). The recognition of qualifications awarded by joint programmes. The Hague: ECA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, M. (2008). Mutual recognition agreements. In European Consortium for Accreditation in higher education (Ed.), The benefit of mutual recognition of accreditation and quality assurance (pp. 1–15). The Hague: European Consortium for Accreditation in higher education.

  • Frederiks, M., & Heusser, R. (2005) Mutual Recognition of Accreditation Decisions: A European Perspective. Paper for INQAAHE Conference 2005, Wellington.

  • Green, M. F. (2011). Lost translation: degree definition and quality in a globalized world. Change. Retrieved Nov. 20, 2011, from http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/September-October%202011/lost-translation-full.html.

  • Heusser, R. (2006). Mutual recognition of accreditation decisions in Europe. Quality in Higher Education, 12(3), 253–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heusser, R. (2011). Joint Programms worksop at the INQAAHE 2011 conference. Retrieved April 6, 2011, from http://www.inqaahe.org/madrid-2011.

  • Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan. (2011). HEEACT—MQA workshop, Taipei.

  • Hou, Y. (2012). Quality in Cross-Border Higher Education and Challenges for the Internationalization of National Quality Assurance Agencies in the Asia-Pacific Region –Taiwan Experience. Studies in Higher Education. Retrieved 2. Feb, 2012, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2011.646258#preview.

  • International Engineering Alliance. (2011). Washington accord. Retrieved Jan. 3, 2011, http://www.washingtonaccord.org/washington-accord/.

  • International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). (2009). Guidelines of good practice in quality assurance. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2009, from http://www.inqaahe.org/main/capacity-building-39/guidelines-of-good-practice-51.

  • International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). (2012). Website. Retrieved May 21, 2012, from http://www.inqaahe.org/.

  • Jiang, Y. (2010). Personal communication. China: SEEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristoffersen, D. (2004). Mutual recognition. APQN Project Group 8. Retrieved Oct. 1, 2010, from http://www.apqn.org/.

  • Kristoffersen, D. (2010). Personal communication. Hong Kong: HKCAAVQ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre, M. J. (2008). The Latin American Perspective. In European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (Ed.), The benefit of mutual recognition of accreditation and quality assurance (pp. 32–36). The Hague: European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education.

  • Neubauer, D. (2011) The International trend in Quality assurance of higher education-implication of mutual recognition on quality assurance outcomes. HEEACT—MQA workshop, Taipei.

  • Olds, K. (2011). International student mobility highlights in the OECD’s education at a glance 2012. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved March 15, 2012 from http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/globalhighered/international_student_mobility_highlights_in_the_oecd_s_education_at_a_glance_2011.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2011). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD.

  • Torre, D. (2011). ARCU-SUR:is it an effective system for mutual recognition and regional integration? Retrieved April 30, 2011 from http://www.inqaahe.org/admin/files/assets/subsites/13/documenten/1303121478_workshop-joint-programs-and-recognition-issues-arcu-sur-is-it-an-effective-system-for-mutual-recognition-and-regional-integration-daniela-torre.pdf.

  • UIS-UNESCO. (2010). Global education digest. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Wende, M. (2011). Global institutions: The organization for economic co-operation and development. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 95–113). Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, D. (2004). The quality of quality assurance agencies. Quality in Higher Education, 10(2), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, D. (2008). International perspectives on the benefits of mutual recognition. In European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education (Ed.), The benefit of mutual recognition of accreditation and quality assurance (pp. 28–36). The Hague: European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education.

  • World Bank. (2007). Cross-border tertiary education: A way toward capacity development. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa, A. (2010). Personal communication. Japan: JIHEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zak, L. (2010). Personal communication. USA: NEASC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Faculty Development & Instructional Resources, Graduate School of Educational Leadership and Development, Fu Jen Catholic University, 510, Jhongjheng Rd., Sinjhuang, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan, ROC

    Angela Yung-Chi Hou

  2. Offiice of Research & Development, Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan, 7F, no 179, Heping E. Rd., Sec. 1, Taipei, 106, Taiwan, ROC

    Angela Yung-Chi Hou

Authors
  1. Angela Yung-Chi Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Yung-Chi Hou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hou, A.YC. Mutual recognition of quality assurance decisions on higher education institutions in three regions: a lesson for Asia. High Educ 64, 911–926 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9536-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9536-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation