Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tuition fees and the challenge of making higher education a popular commodity in South Africa

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The funding of higher education in South Africa has in the recent past been a subject of animated debate. This debate has ranged from the adequacy of government funding of higher education, the suitability of the funding framework, to protestations against frequent tuition fee increases. At present, the debate is mainly about “free” higher education. Unlike most African countries, South Africa has an established history of cost sharing. But, for a while now, students, especially Black students, have been demanding tuition free higher education even though the country has a student financial aid scheme to support talented but poor students. The demands for tuition free higher education suggest, among others, the possible existence of financial barriers to higher educational opportunities. This paper is a sequel to the debate on free higher education in South Africa. It seeks, in the main, to understand and examine the rationale and drivers for the students’ demand for “free” higher education. What are the financial barriers to higher educational opportunities that the current funding architecture has failed to address? Secondly, why are students demanding free higher education when there is a scheme to support talented but poor students? Is cost sharing inconsistent with the country’s post-apartheid transformation policy in higher education? Finally, is “free” higher education the panacea to the access and participation challenges facing Black students?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) is an income contingent loan and bursary scheme established in 1996. NSFAS allocations are currently based on average cost of study programmes and not the actual cost. This leads to underfunding, hence the inability by some NSFAS beneficiaries to meet their study costs.

References

  • Aduol, F., Cheboi, B., Johnstone, B.D., Marcucci, P., Pillay, P. & Wainaina, G. (2010). Financing university education in Kenya: A report to the Ministry of Higher Education, Science & Technology. Unpublished report.

  • Bhorat, H., Mayet, N., & Visser, M. (2010). Student graduation, labour market destinations and employment earnings. In M. Letseka, M. Cosser, M. Breier, & M. Visser (Eds.), Student retention and graduate destination: Higher education & labour market access and success (pp. 97–123). Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhorat, H., Van der Westhuizen, C. & Jacobs, T. (2009). Income and non-income inequality in post-apartheid South Africa: What are the drivers and possible policy interventions? DPRU Working Paper 09/138.

  • Bunting, I., & Cloete, N. (2008). Governing access to higher education in South Africa. Unpublished paper.

  • Cloete, N. (Ed.). (2009). Responding to the educational needs of post-school youth: Determining the scope of the problem and developing a capacity-building model. Cape Town: Centre for Higher Education Transformation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosser, M., & Letseka, M. (2010). Introduction. In M. Letseka, M. Cosser, M. Breier, & M. Visser (Eds.), Student retention and graduate destination: Higher education & labour market access and success (pp. 1–9). Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2002). Education statistics in South Africa at a glance in 2000. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2003). Education statistics in South Africa at a glance in 2001. Pretoria.

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2004). Education statistics in South Africa at a glance in 2002. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2005a). Education statistics in South Africa at a glance in 2003. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2005b). Education statistics in South Africa at a glance in 2004. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2005c). Student enrolment planning in public higher education. Available online at: http://www.edu.gov.za/content/documents/705.pdf. Accessed June 20 2008.

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2006). Education statistics in South Africa at a glance in 2005. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2007). Student tuition fees and the resourcing of public higher education. Presentation by Professor Ian Bunting to the Task Team, 15 May.

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2008a). Education Statistics in South Africa at a glance in 2006. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2008b). 2008 school realities. Available: http://www.education.gov.za/EMIS/StatisticalPublications/tabid/462/Default.aspx. Retrieved 22 April 2012.

  • Department of Education (DoE). (2009). 2009 school realities. September 2009. Available: http://www.education.gov.za/EMIS/StatisticalPublications/tabid/462/Default.aspx. Retrieved 22 April 2012.

  • Department of Higher Education & Training. (2010). Report of the Ministerial Committee on the Review of the National Student Financial Aid Scheme. Pretoria.

  • Higher Education South Africa (HESA). (2008). Tuition fees: Higher education institutions in South Africa. Available at: http://www.hesa.org.za/resources/HESA%20TT%20Report%20%20-%2027%20Feb%202008%20(2).pdf.

  • Hughes, R. (1994). Legitimation, higher education, and the post-colonial state: A comparative study of India and Kenya. Comparative Education, 30(3), 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johstone and Marcucci. (2010). Financing higher education worldwide: Who pays? Who should pay?. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letseka, M., Cosser, M., Breier, M., & Visser, M. (2010). Student retention and graduate destination: Higher education and labour market access and success. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makulu, H. F. (1971). Education, development and nation-building in independent Africa. London: SCM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2006). Higher education, the state and the marketplace. Paper presented at the 16th Conference of Commonwealth Education Ministers (16CCEM), Cape Town, 11–14 December.

  • National Planning Commission. (2011). Diagnostic overview. Pretoria: The Presidency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouma, G. W. (2007). Reducing resource dependence on government funding: The case of public universities in Kenya and South Africa. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cape Town.

  • Steyn, G., & de Villiers, P. (2006). The impact of changing funding sources on higher education institutions in South Africa. Pretoria: The Council on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Yu, D. (2009). Socio-economic status and educational achievement: Does education provide a stepping stone out of poverty in South Africa? In J. Hofmeyr (Ed.), Recession and recovery: 2009 transformation audit (pp. 66–75). Cape Town: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teal, F. (2010). Higher education and economic development in Africa: A review of channels of interaction and evidence. Paper presented at the 32nd African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) Biannual Research Workshop on Higher Education and Economic Development, May 29–June 3 2010 in Mombasa, Kenya.

  • Teixeira, P. N., Johnstone, D. B., Rosa, M. J., & Vossensteyn, H. (Eds.). (2006). Cost-sharing and accessibility in higher education: A fairer deal?. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Berg, S. (2007). Apartheid’s enduring legacy: Inequalities in education. Journal of African Economies, 16(5), 849–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Berg, S. (2008). How effective are poor schools? Poverty and educational outcomes in South Africa. Discussion paper number 68. Centre for European, Governance and Economic Development Research. Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen.

  • Wangenge-Ouma, G. (2008). Globalisation and higher education funding policy shifts in Kenya. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(3), 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangenge-Ouma, G. (2010). Funding and the attainment of transformation goals in South Africa’s higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 36(4), 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangenge-Ouma, G., & Cloete, N. (2008). Financing higher education in South Africa: Public funding, non-government revenue and tuition fees. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(4), 906–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumeta, W. (2004). State Higher Education Financing: Demand Imperatives Meet Structural, Cyclical, and Political Constraints. In St. John, E. P. & Parsons, M. D. (Eds.), Public funding of higher education: Changing contexts and new rationales (pp. 79–107). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald Wangenge-Ouma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wangenge-Ouma, G. Tuition fees and the challenge of making higher education a popular commodity in South Africa. High Educ 64, 831–844 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9531-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9531-6

Keywords

Navigation