Skip to main content

Towards transnational academic capitalism

Abstract

This paper contributes to current debates on the relationship between globalisation and higher education. The main argument of the paper is that we are currently witnessing transnationalisation of academic capitalism. This argument is illustrated by examining the collaboration between transnational corporations and research universities, and how transnational academic capitalism has been promoted by different intermediating organizations. On theoretical level the paper draws from global capitalism school and the theory of academic capitalism, but also moves beyond them by introducing new concepts such as knowledge-intensive transnational economic practices. The emergence of transnational academic capitalism challenges the common assumption that universities are primarily promoters of national economic competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    I prefer to use the term “transnational” since the term “international” is based on nation-state centric approaches, and nation-states are not the immediate key actors in those cross-border activities and processes that are explored in this article.

  2. 2.

    It has been often pointed out that patenting does not always increase universities’ revenues and there are significant differences between universities in respect how intensively they have engaged into patenting (e.g. Slaughter and Rhoades 2004).

  3. 3.

    Instead of the term “new economy” I use in this article the term “knowledge capitalism”.

  4. 4.

    One such social process, or knowledge-intensive transnational practice, is HE export (e.g. Newman et al. 2004).

  5. 5.

    On empirical evidence regarding other transnational organizations and European level policies that have facilitated during 1980s and 1990s in practice TAC on European level, see Grande and Peschke (1998).

  6. 6.

    Much more attention has been given, for instance, to international organizations such as the World Bank (e.g. Rhoades et al. 2004).

  7. 7.

    For example, German TNCs set up more foreign R&D facilities in the 1990s than in the preceding 50 years (UNCTAD 2005, xxvi).

  8. 8.

    In this respect one interesting object of study would be whether there is any correlation between the positions of universities in the global university rankings and how intensively they are networked with TNCs, and if so, what would explain this correlation.

  9. 9.

    Finpro is an association that was founded by Finnish companies to facilitate their internationalization (Finpro 2010).

  10. 10.

    Invest in Finland is a government agency promoting foreign investments into Finland.

References

  1. Airaksinen, T. (2010). International companies can boost Finland’s innovation system. Baltic Rim Economies, 3/2010, 23. 6. 2010. http://www.tse.fi/FI/yksikot/erillislaitokset/pei/Documents/BRE2010/BRE%203-2010/BRE_3_2010_17.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2011.

  2. BHEF. (2011). Creating solutions, inspiring action. Business-higher education forum. http://www.bhef.com/. Accessed 17 April 2011.

  3. Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll, W. K. (2010). The making of a transnational capitalist class. Corporate power in the 21st century. London and New York: Zed Books.

  5. Coe, N. M., & Bunnell, T. G. (2003). ‘Spatializing’ knowledge communities: Towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks. Global Networks, 3(4), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Wit, H., & Knight, J. (1999). Quality and internationalisation in higher education. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dicken, P. (2007). Global shift (5th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunning, J. (1992). Multinational enterprise and the globalisation of innovatory capacity. In O. Granstrand, L. Hakanson, & S. Sjølander (Eds.), Technology management and international business: Internationalisation of R&D and technology. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  9. EC. (2006). Report on the outcomes of the: “Public consultation on transnational research cooperation and knowledge transfer between public research organisations and industry” (draft). European Commission, Brussels, 1 September 2006 M1/FM-DD D(2006). http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/consult_report.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2012.

  10. EC. (2010a). ERA in the knowledge triangle. http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/understanding/what/era_in_the_knowledge_triangle_en.htm. Accessed 31 Jan 2012.

  11. EC. (2010b). An open space for knowledge. http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/understanding/what/what_is_era_en.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2012.

  12. EIT. (2012). Powering European innovation. European Institute of Innovation and Technology. http://eit.europa.eu/kics1/knowledge-and-innovation-communities/overview.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2012.

  13. Enders, J. (2004). Higher education, internationalization, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher Education, 47, 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fagelberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2005). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Finpro. (2010). About Finpro. http://www.finpro.fi/en-US/About+Finpro/. Accessed 6 June 2010.

  16. Florida, R. (1997). The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA. Research Policy, 26, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Franco, E., Ray, S., & Ray, P. K. (2011). Patterns of innovation practices of multinational-affiliates in emerging economies: Evidences from Brazil and India. World Development, 39(7), 1249–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gerybadze, A., & Reger, G. (1999). Globalization of R&D: Recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, 28, 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grande, E., & Peschke, A. (1998). Transnational cooperation and policy networks in European science policy-making. Research Policy, 28, 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Granstrand, O. (1999). Internationalization of corporate R&D: A study of Japanese and Swedish corporations. Research Policy, 28, 275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guimón, J. (2011). Policies to benefit from the globalization of corporate R&D: An exploratory study for EU countries. Technovation, 31, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jessop, B. (2008). Cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Knight, J., & de Wit, H. (1995). Strategies for internationalization of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives. In H. de Wit (Ed.), Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America. Amsterdam: EAIE.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuemmerle, W. (1999a). The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuemmerle, W. (1999b). Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries—Results from a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy, 28, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43, 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mars, M. M., Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2008). The state-sponsored student entrepreneur. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 639–680.

    Google Scholar 

  29. May, C. (2002). The information society. A skeptical view. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Microsoft. (2011). Our research. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/research/default.aspx. Accessed 19 April 2011.

  31. Narula, R., & Zanfei, A. (2005). Globalization and innovation: The role of multinational enterprises. In J. Fagelberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Newman, F., Couturier, L., & Scurry, J. (2004). The future of higher education: Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  33. OECD. (2008). OECD Annual Report 2008. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Developmet. Paris: OECD.

  34. Olds, K. (2007). Global assemblage: Singapore, foreign universities, and the construction of a ‘‘global education hub’’. World Development, 35(6), 959–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (2000). National systems of innovation under strain: the internationalization of corporate R&D. In R. Barrel, G. Mason, & M. Mahony (Eds.), Productivity, innovation and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rhoades, G., Maldonado-Maldonado, A., Ordorika, I., & Velazquez, M. (2004). Imagining alternativas to global, corporate, new economy academic capitalism. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 316–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (2004). Academic capitalism in the new economy: Challenges and choices. American Academic, 1(1), 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Robinson, W. I. (1999). Beyond nation-state paradigms: Globalization, sociology, and the challenge of transnational studies. Sociological Forum, 13(4), 561–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson, W. I. (2004). A theory of global capitalism. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. RS. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. RS policy document 03/11. London: The Royal Society.

  41. Sassen, S. (2007). A Sociology of Globalization. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sell, S. K. (2003). Private power, public law. The globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. Sklair, L. (2001). Transnational capitalist class. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sklair, L. (2002). Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Slaughter, S. (2001). Problems in comparative higher education: Political economy, political sociology and postmodernism. Higher Education, 41, 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2011). Transatlantic moves to the market: The United States and the European Union. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9460-9.

  47. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  48. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  49. Taylor, J. (2004). Toward a strategy for internationalisation: Lessons and practice from four universities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tekes. (2010). FinNode. A gateway to the Finnish innovation ecosystem. http://www.tekes.fi/en/community/FinNode/806/FinNode/1756. Accessed 1 Feb 2012.

  51. UNCTAD. (2005). World Investment Report. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). New York.

  52. UNCTAD. (2008). World Investment Report. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). New York.

  53. van Vught, F. (2011). Responding to the EU innovation strategy. The need for institutional profiling in european higher education and research. In J. Enders, H. F. de Boer & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Reform of higher education in Europe. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam.

  54. von Zedwitz, M., & Gassmann, O. (2002). Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31, 569–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research article was largely written at the University of Georgia (US), The Institute of Higher Education (between August 2010-February 2011) where I worked as a Visiting Fulbright Post Doc Researcher. I want to thank, with the usual disclaimer, Brendan Cantwell, Tuukka Kaidesoja, Rajani Naidoo, and Sheila Slaughter, as well as anonymous referees, for comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilkka Kauppinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kauppinen, I. Towards transnational academic capitalism. High Educ 64, 543–556 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9511-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Transnational academic capitalism
  • Transnational corporations
  • Global capitalism