Higher Education

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 207–222 | Cite as

Creating entrepreneurial networks: academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education

Article

Abstract

Network-building activities of PhD students are an important area of study in furthering our understanding of academic entrepreneurship. This paper focuses on PhD students’ participation in network-building activities defined as mobility and collaboration, as well as own interest in and perceived grade of support for commercialisation from various levels of the university hierarchy. The results of a large-scale survey (of 1,126 PhD students at Linköping University, Sweden, 41% response rate) presented here show that the majority of PhD students are engaged in collaborations with external organisations, though quite few (one quarter) have spent a part of their PhD education outside their home university. PhD students from all faculties are on average interested in commercialisation and in favour of it. However, PhD students from the faculty of Health Sciences state that it is difficult for them to combine research and commercialisation. Furthermore, interest in commercialisation of research results is relatively lowest amongst those PhD students who are undertaking mobility placements at other universities, thus pointing to an experienced incompatibility of research and academic entrepreneurship.

Keywords

Academic entrepreneurship Mobility Collaboration Network-building activities PhD education University–industry networks Commercialisation of research 

References

  1. Aagaard Nielsen, K., & Svensson, L. G. (Eds.). (2006). Action research and interactive research: Beyond practice and theory. Maastricht: Shaker.Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H., Rosen, B., & Woodward, W. (1987). The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: A longitudinal study. In N. C. Churchil, J. A. Hornaday, B. A. Kirchhoff, O. J. Krasner, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Proceedings of the seventh annual Babson college entrepreneurship research conference. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
  3. Altbach, P. G. (2001). Academic freedom: International realities and challenges. Higher Education, 41(1), 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avveduto, S. (2001). International mobility of PhDs. In OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation, Development) (Ed.), Innovative people. Mobility of skilled personnel in national innovation systems (pp. 229–242). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  5. Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35(4), 518–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university—industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1–2), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2009). Entrepreneurship and the PhD: A case study of a doctoral mobility program. Paper presented at Triple Helix VII conference, June 17–19, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  9. Bienkowska, D., Larsen, K., & Sörlin, S. (2010). Public-private innovation: Mediating roles and ICT niches of industrial research institutes. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bienkowska, D., Lundmark, M., & Malmberg, A. (2011). Brain circulation and flexible adjustment: Labour mobility as a cluster advantage. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 93(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boden, D., Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. (2011). Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. Higher Education, 62(6), 741–755Google Scholar
  12. Bond, R., & Paterson, L. (2005). Coming down from the ivory tower? Academics’ civic and economic engagement with the community. Oxford Review of Education, 31(3), 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butcher, J., & Jeffrey, P. (2007). A view from the coal face: UK research student perceptions of successful and unsuccessful collaborative projects. Research Policy, 36(8), 1239–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlson, W. B. (1988). Academic entrepreneurship and engineering education: Dugald C. Jackson and the MIT-GE cooperative engineering course, 1907–1932. Technology and Culture, 29(3), 536–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chrisman, J. J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the university of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cowen, R. (1991). The management and evaluation of the entrepreneurial university: The case of England. Higher Education Policy, 4(3), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2007). Patent and publication activities of German professors: An empirical assessment of their co-activity. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Enders, J. (2002). Serving many masters: The PhD on the labour market, the everlasting need of inequality, and the premature death of humboldt. Higher Education, 44(3), 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2), 198–233.Google Scholar
  23. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix—university–industry–government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.Google Scholar
  26. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fisher, D., & Atkinson-Grosjean, J. (2002). Brokers on the boundary: Academy-industry liaison in Canadian universities. Higher Education, 44(3), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fornahl, D. (2003). Entrepreneurial activities in a regional context. In D. Fornahl & T. Brenner (Eds.), Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems (pp. 38–57). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  30. Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur?” Is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32.Google Scholar
  31. Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university? International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4, 73–110.Google Scholar
  32. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  33. Granovetter, M. S. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harman, G. (1999). Australian science and technology academics and university–industry research links. Higher Education, 38(1), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harman, K. (2002). The research training experiences of doctoral students linked to Australian cooperative research centres. Higher Education, 44(3), 469–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harman, K. (2004). Producing ‘industry-ready’ doctorates: Australian cooperative research centre approaches to doctoral education. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(3), 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  39. Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jacob, M. (2001). Managing the institutionalisation of mode 2 knowledge production. Science Studies, 14(2), 83–100.Google Scholar
  41. Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: The case of Chalmers university of technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jöns, H. (2009). ‘Brain circulation’ and transnational knowledge networks: Studying long-term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954–2000. Global Networks, 9(3), 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kezar, A. J., & Eckel, P. D. (2002). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 435–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: The case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klofsten, M., Heydebreck, P., & Jones-Evans, D. (2010). Transferring good practice beyond organizational borders: Lessons from transferring an entrepreneurship programme. Regional Studies, 44(6), 791–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kyvik, S., Karseth, B., & Blume, S. (1999). International mobility among nordic doctoral students. Higher Education, 38(4), 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li, H. (2010). Higher education in China: Complement or competition to US universities? In C. T. Clotfelter (Ed.), American universities in a global market (pp. 269–304). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L., & Brewer, M. (1996). Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 7(4), 428–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lowe, R., & Gonzalez-Brambila, C. (2007). Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3), 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Magnusson, M., McKelvey, M., & Versiglioni, M. (2009). The forgotten individuals: Attitudes and skills in academic commercialization in Sweden. In M. McKelvey & M. Holmén (Eds.), Learning to compete in European Universities (pp. 219–250). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  51. Mosey, S., Lockett, A., & Westhead, P. (2006). Creating network bridges for university technology transfer: The medici fellowship programme. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (Eds.). (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  53. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction—‘mode 2’ revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41(3), 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paul, J.-J., & Perret, C. (2001). The reforms of post graduate studies in France: A story of a forced marriage. Paper presented at postgraduate education in Europe: Past, present and future conference, May 4–5, Linköping.Google Scholar
  55. Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26(4), 518–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Salminen-Karlsson, M., & Wallgren, L. (2008). The interaction of academic and industrial supervisors in graduate education. Higher Education, 56(1), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Santoro, M. D. (2000). Success breeds success: The linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry–university collaborative ventures. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(2), 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Scott, P. (1997). The changing role of the university in the production of new knowledge. Tertiary Education and Management, 3(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  61. Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Starbuck, E. (2001). Optimizing university research collaborations. Research-Technology Management, 44(1), 40–44.Google Scholar
  65. Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351–370.Google Scholar
  66. Thune, T. (2009). Doctoral students on the university–industry interface: A review of the literature. Higher Education, 58(5), 637–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thune, T. (2010). The training of “triple helix workers”? Doctoral students in university–industry–government collaborations. Minerva, 48(4), 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. University of Wales Global Academy. (2011). What is POWIS? http://www.globalacademy.org.uk/powis. Accessed March 4, 2011.
  69. Urry, J. (2002). Mobility and proximity. Sociology, 36(2), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zellner, C., & Fornahl, D. (2002). Scientific knowledge and implications for its diffusion. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and Engineering and HELIX VINN Excellence CentreLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations