Abstract
Sociological institutional theory views universities as model driven organizations. The world’s stratification system promotes conformity, imitation and isomorphism towards the “best” university models. Accordingly, academic roles may be locally shaped in minor ways, but are defined and measured explicitly in global terms. We test this proposition using data on the allocation of working time between academic tasks at research universities in thirteen countries: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Malaysia, Norway, UK, and the USA. We find that working time patterns differ significantly across countries, suggesting that conditions of academic work remain heavily dependent on national higher education traditions. Faculty members holding the highest professorial rank share more in common, with generally stronger interests in research and a greater time dedication to research over teaching. However, in countries with comparably steep academic hierarchies, professor positions typically entail significantly fewer teaching hours and more administration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altbach, P. G. (1996). The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Barry, J., Berg, E., & Chandler, J. (2003). Managing intellectual labour in Sweden and England. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 10(3), 3–22.
Bellas, M. L., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education, 22, 367–390.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Enders, J., & Musselin, C. (2008). Back to the future? The academic professions in the 21st century. In Higher Education to 2030: Demography (Vol. 1, pp. 125–150). Paris: OECD.
Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1997). A victim of their own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 34(3), 347–372.
Etzkowitz, H., Dzisah, J., Ranga, M., & Zhou, C. (2007). The triple helix model for innovation: The university-industry-government interaction. Asia Pacific Tech Monitor, 24(1), 14–23.
Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980 s: Variations on a theme. Accounting Organisations and Society, 20, 93–109.
Jaccard, J., Becker, M. A., & Wood, G. (1984). Pairwise multiple comparison procedures: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 589–596.
Jacobs, J. A. (1998). Measuring time at work: Are self-reports accurate? Monthly Labor Review, 121(12), 42–53.
Jacobs, J. A. (2004). The faculty time divide. Sociological Forum, 19(1), 3–27.
Jacobs, J. A., & Winslow, S. E. (2004). The academic life course, time pressures and gender inequality. Community, Work & Family, 7(2), 143–161.
Jones, D. R. (1992). National models of higher education: International transfer. In G. Neave & B. R. Clark (Eds.), Encyclopedia of higher education. Vol. 2 (pp. 956–969). Oxford: Pergamon.
Kyvik, S. (2000). Academic work in Norwegian higher education. In M. Tight (Ed.), Academic work and life: What it is to be an academic, and how this is changing (pp. 33–72). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Kyvik, S., & Smeby, J. C. (1994). Teaching and research. The relationship between the supervision of graduate students and faculty research performance. Higher Education, 28(2), 227–239.
Lafferty, G., & Fleming, J. (2000). The restructuring of academic work in Australia: Power, management and gender. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(2), 257–267.
Lee, M. N. N. (2004). Global trends, national policies and institutional responses: Restructuring higher education in Malaysia. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3(1), 31–46.
Marginson, S. (2000). Rethinking academic work in the global era. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(1), 23–35.
Marginson, S. (2007). University mission and identity for a post post-public era. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1), 117–131.
Marquina, M., & Fernandez Lamarra, N. (2008). The Academic Profession in Argentina: Characteristics and trends in the context of a mass higher education system. In Changing academic profession in international comparative and quantitative perspectives. Report of the international conference on the changing academic profession project, RIHE international seminar reports. Vol. 12, September 2008 (pp. 363–387). Hiroshima: RIHE Hiroshima University.
Massy, W. F., & Zemsky, R. (1994). Faculty discretionary time: Departments and the “academic ratchet”. Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 1–22.
Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Frank, D. J., & Schofer, E. (2007). Higher education as an institution. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts (pp. 187–221). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Milem, J. F., Berger, J. B., & Dey, E. L. (2000). Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years. Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 454–475.
Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 5–27.
Mok, K.-H. (1999). The cost of managerialism: The implications for the ‘McDonaldisation’of higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(1), 117–127.
Olsen, T. B., Kyvik, S., & Hovdhaugen, E. (2005). The promotion to full professor–through competition or by individual competence? Tertiary Education and Management, 11(4), 299–316.
Research Institute for Higher Education (RIHE). (2008). Changing academic profession in international comparative and quantitative perspectives. Report of the international conference on the changing academic profession project, RIHE international seminar reports. Vol. 12, September 2008. Hiroshima: RIHE Hiroshima University.
Rhoades, G. L. (1998). Managed professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring academic labor. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Robinson, J. P., & Bostrom, A. (1994). The Overestimated workweek? What time diary measures suggest. Monthly Labor Review, 111(8), 11–23.
Rostan, M. (2008). The Changing Academic Profession in Italy: Accounts from the past, first insights from the present. In Changing academic profession in international comparative and quantitative perspectives. Report of the international conference on the changing academic profession project, RIHE international seminar reports. Vol. 12, September 2008 (pp. 153–178). Hiroshima: RIHE Hiroshima University.
Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Scott, J. C. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1–39.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
UNESCO. (1978). Recommendation concerning the international standardization of statistics on science and technology. Paris: UNESCO.
Vabø, A., & Ramberg, I. (2009). Arbeidsvilkår i norsk forskning. Oslo: NIFU STEP.
Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement. ASHE-ERIC higher education report, 29(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Welch, A. R. (Ed.). (2005). The professoriate: Profile of a profession. Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bentley, P.J., Kyvik, S. Academic work from a comparative perspective: a survey of faculty working time across 13 countries. High Educ 63, 529–547 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9457-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9457-4