Abstract
This paper reports on the practice of buying-out teaching to create time for research. A study was carried out, at a regional university in Australia, with academics in receipt of research grant funds (and therefore with the means to buy out teaching), Heads of School, and the Deputy Vice Chancellors responsible respectively for research and for academic matters. We found that while eligible academics did buy out teaching by employing casual staff, most of them worried about the potential effects on teaching quality and students’ learning. Heads of School were more sanguine about possible effects on teaching. Decision making by academics about whether to buy out teaching, and by Heads of School about whether to allow it in particular cases, took account of a number of factors. Some teaching activities were seen as higher-risk than others for buying-out. It was uniformly recognised by all parties that buying-out did not result in complete relief from the teaching activity that was bought out; a great deal of time and energy needed to be invested by the academic in making appropriate arrangements and monitoring the quality of work undertaken by the casual staff. The paper suggests that clearer policies need to be instituted in this area; academics were unsure what buying-out was allowed or acceptable, and would benefit from more discussion of the practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Research Council [ARC]. (2009). ERA 2010 submission guidelines. ARC, Canberra. Available at http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/ERA2010_sub_guide.pdf.
Billot, J. (2010). The imagined and the real: Identifying the tensions for academic identity. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 709–721.
Bryson, C. (2004). What about the workers? The expansion of higher education and the transformation of academic work. Industrial Relations Journal, 35(10), 38–57.
Cheek, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry, ethics, and politics of evidence. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1051–1059.
Coombe, K., & Clancy, S. (2002). Reconceptualizing the teaching team in universities: Working with sessional staff. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(2), 159–166.
Davies, S. M. B., & Salisbury, J. (2009). Building educational research capacity through inter-institutional collaboration: An evaluation of the first year of the Welsh Education Research Network (WERN). Welsh Journal of Education, 14(2), 78–94.
Department of Employment, Education & Workplace Relations. (2010). Staff 2009: Selected higher education statistics. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education & Workplace Relations. http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Publications/HEStatistics/Publications/Pages/Staff.aspx.
Flyvberg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Fox, R., Crask, M., & Kim, J. (1988). Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52(4), 467–491.
Garlick, S. (2000). Engaging universities and regions: Knowledge contribution to regional economic development on Australia. Canberra: Department of Education, Training & Youth Affairs.
Halcomb, E., Andrew, S., Peters, K., Salamonson, Y., & Jackson, D. (2010). Casualisation of the teaching workforce: Implications for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 30(6), 528–532.
Houston, D., Meyer, L., & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 28(1), 17–30.
Jenkins, A. (2004). A Guide to the Research Evidence on Teaching-Research Relations. York: The Higher Education Academy.
Kimber, M. (2003). The tenured ‘core’ and the tenuous ‘periphery’: The casualisation of academic work in Australian universities. Journal of Higher Education. Policy and Management, 25(1), 41–50.
Kogan, M., Moses, I., & El-Khawas, E. (1994). Staffing higher education: Meeting new challenges. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Lemass, B., & Stace, R. (2009). Towards teaching and research parity. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 14(1), 21–27.
Marginson, S. (2000). Re-thinking academic work in the global era. Journal of Higher Education. Policy and Management, 22(1), 23–35.
Percy, A., & Beaumont, R. (2008). The casualisation of teaching and the subject at risk. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(2), 145–157.
Smith, E., & Coombe, K. (1998, August). Pedagogical outsourcing in higher education: A case study. Paper presented to the annual conference of the British Education Research Association, Queen’s University, Belfast.
Smith, E., & Coombe, K. (2006). University marking by sessional staff: Quality and qualms. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 51(1), 45–69.
Warton, P. (2005). What parts of teaching do academics see as feasible to delegate? Higher Education, 29(2), 129–141.
Werk, J. (2009). The changing European profession of political science. European Political Science, 8(2), 151–161.
Wolverton, M. (1998). Treading the tenure-track tightrope: Finding balance between research excellence and quality teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 23(1), 61–79.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Young, P. (2006). Out of balance: Lecturers’ perceptions of differential status and rewards in relation to teaching and research. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2), 191–202.
Zubrick, A., Reid, I., & Rossiter, P. (2001). Strengthening the nexus between teaching and research. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs: Canberra, http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/eippubs/eip01_2/01_2.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, E., Smith, A. Buying-out teaching for research: the views of academics and their managers. High Educ 63, 455–472 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9452-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9452-9