Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the relationship between individual, institutional and demographic characteristics on one hand and the research productivity of agriculture faculty members on the other. The statistical population of the research comprises 280 academic staff in agricultural faculties all over Tehran Province. The data regarding research productivity and demographic characteristics were extracted from the faculty members’ profiles. Questionnaires were utilized to collect information concerning individual and institutional variables. The reliably of the questionnaire was calculated to be between 0.74 and 0.97 using the Cronbach’s Alpha. The regression analysis revealed that from among demographic characteristics two variables, namely, academic rank and age (\( {\text{R}}_{\text{AD}}^{ 2} \) = 0.265), among individual characteristics, three variables, namely, working habits, creativity as well as autonomy and commitment (\( {\text{R}}_{\text{AD}}^{ 2} \) = 0.097), and among institutional characteristics four variables namely, network of communication with colleagues, resources of facilities, corporate management and clear research objectives (\( {\text{R}}_{\text{AD}}^{ 2} \) = 0.151) were significant predictors for agricultural faculty members’ research productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babu, A. R., & Sing, Y. P. (1998). Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, 43, 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bently, R. J. (1990). Faculty research performance over time and its relationship to sources of grant support. Ph. D dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Berber, R., & Kurul, N. (2009). The Motivating factors for productivity in R&D: Preliminary results of a survey in some engineering schools in Turkey. To be presented at PICMET ‘09 Conference—Technology management in the age of fundamental change Portland State University, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Portland, Oregon—USA, 2–6 August, 2009.

  • Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., & Hall, D. E. (1978). Research note: Correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, 51, 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risebey, K. R., & Justin, G. J. (2005). A Theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, C. J., & Ruffin, M. T. (1992). Characteristics of a productivity research environment: Literature review. Academic Medicine, 67(6), 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brocato, J. J. (2001). The research productivity of family medicine department faculty: A national study (dissertation). Michigan State University.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Bean, J. P. (1996). Research output, socialization and the Biglan model. Research in Higher Education, 15(1), 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Brown, M. L. (1992). How chairpersons enhance faculty research: A grounded theory study. The Review of Higher Education, 15(1), 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundar, H., & lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. J. (1984). The American academic profession; A synthesis of social scientific inquire since World War II. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, L., Velloso, F., & Wofchuk, S. (1997). The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 39(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, B. C., & Veloso, F. (2003). The determinants of research productivity: A study of Mexicam Research. Department of engineering and public policy, Carneyie Mellon University.

  • Hadjinicola, G. C., & Soteriou, A. C. (2006). Factors affecting research productivity of production and operation management groups: An empirical study. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 1(2006), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itagaki, W., & Pile-Sellman, J. (2005). Factors associated with academic radiology research productivity. Radiology, 231, 774–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. M., Meador, M., & Walters, S. K. (1988). Effects of department size organization on the research productivity of academic economists. Economic Education Research, 7, 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortlik, J. W., Bartlett, J. E., Higgins, C. C., & Williams, H. A. (2002). Factors associated whit research productivity of agricultural education faculty. Annual National Agricultural Education Research Conference, December 2001, pp. 195–206.

  • Kyvik, S. (1990). Age and scientific productivity: Difference in fields of learning. Higher Education, 19, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S., & Stephan, P. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review, 81, 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigation. Chicago: The university of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelz, D. C., & Anderews, F. M. (1976). Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. Ann Arbor, Mich: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prpic, K. (1996). Scientific fields and eminent scientist productivity patterns and factors. Scientomoterics, 37(3), 445–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransdell, L. B. (2001). Using the precede- proceed model to increase productivity in health education faculty. The International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 4, 276–282. Online at: http://www.iejhe.org.

  • Reskin, B. F. (1977). Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science. American Sociological Review, 42, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P., Mrray, H. G., & Paunonen, S. V. (1987). Personality characteristics associated with high research productivity. In D. N. Jackson & J. P. Rushton (Eds.), Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (pp. 129–148). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  • Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research Higher Education, 43, 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeby, J. C., & Try, S. (2005). Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 593–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, J. F., Lanphear, B. P., Curtis, P., & Vu, K. O. (2002). Indicators of early research productivity among primary care fellows. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17, 854–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L., & Mairesse, J. (2003). Explaning individual productivity difference in scientific research productivity: How important are institutional and individual determinants? Condensed matter (1380–1997).submitted to Annuales d,economic et de statistiques for the specialissue in honor of Zvi Griliches.

  • Wang, E. C., & Huang, W. (2008). Examining the factors affecting research performance: The EBA approach applied to top American university. Presented at Western Michigan University, Sep 12, 2008.

  • Zainab, A. N. (1999). Personal academic and departmental correlates of research productivity: A review of literature. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 4(2), 73–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousef Hedjazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedjazi, Y., Behravan, J. Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. High Educ 62, 635–647 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9410-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9410-6

Keywords

Navigation