In recent years, academics and educators have begun to use software mapping tools for a number of education-related purposes. Typically, the tools are used to help impart critical and analytical skills to students, to enable students to see relationships between concepts, and also as a method of assessment. The common feature of all these tools is the use of diagrammatic relationships of various kinds in preference to written or verbal descriptions. Pictures and structured diagrams are thought to be more comprehensible than just words, and a clearer way to illustrate understanding of complex topics. Variants of these tools are available under different names: “concept mapping”, “mind mapping” and “argument mapping”. Sometimes these terms are used synonymously. However, as this paper will demonstrate, there are clear differences in each of these mapping tools. This paper offers an outline of the various types of tool available and their advantages and disadvantages. It argues that the choice of mapping tool largely depends on the purpose or aim for which the tool is used and that the tools may well be converging to offer educators as yet unrealised and potentially complementary functions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Harrell provides a comprehensive list of argument mapping software (Harrell 2008).
Ahlberg, M. (1993). Concept maps, vee diagrams, and Rhetorical Argumentation (RA) analysis: Three educational theory-based tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Paper presented at the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University. Available from.
Ahlberg, M. (2004). Varieties of concept mapping. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain. Available from.
Amundsen, C., Weston, C., & McAlpine, L. (2008). Concept mapping to support university academics’ analysis of course content. Studies in Higher Education, 33(6), 633–652.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
Baugh, N. G., & Mellott, K. G. (1998). Clinical concept mapping as preparation for student nurses’ clinical experiences. Journal of Nursing Education, 37(6), 253–256.
Beitz, J. M. (1998). Concept mapping: Navigating the learning process. Nurse Educator, 23(5), 35–41.
Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1), 57–75.
Biktimirov, E. N., & Nilson, L. B. (2003). Mapping your course: Designing a graphic syllabus for introductory FINANCE. Journal of Education for Business, 78(July//August), 308–312.
Biktimirov, E. N., & Nilson, L. B. (2006). Show Them the money: Using mind mapping in the introductory finance course. Journal of Financial Education, 32(Fall), 72–86.
Buzan, T. (1974). Using both sides of your brain. New York: E. P. Dutton.
Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2000). The mind map book. London: BBC Books.
Cañas, A. J., Hill, G., Carff, R., Suri, N., Lott, J., & Eskridge, T. (2004). CMap tools: A knowledge modellign and sharing environment. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Concept maps theory, methodology, technology: First international conference on concept mapping (Vol. 1, pp. 125–133). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publica de Navarra.
Chei-Chang, C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375–387.
Concept Map. (2010). Retrieved 8/3/2010, Wikipedia, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concept_map&oldid=139167845.
Cowan, N. (2000). The magical number four in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 671–684.
Daley, B. J. (2004). Using concept maps in qualitative research. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamploma, Spain. Available from http://cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004-060.pdf.
Davies, W. M. (2009a). Computer-assisted argument mapping: A rationale approach. Higher Education, 58(6), 799–820.
Davies, W. M. (2009b). Not quite right: Teaching students how to make better arguments. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), 327–340.
Edmonson, K. M. (1993, April 12-16). Concept mapping for the development of medical curricula. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, Georgia. Available from.
Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching; an integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Chichester: John Wiley.
Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5, 202–210.
Eriksson, L. T., & Hauer, A. M. (2004). Mind map marketing: A creative approach in developing marketing skills. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(2), 174–187.
Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002a). The efficacy of “mind map” study technique. Medical Education, 36(May), 426–431.
Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002b). The efficacy of the ‘mind map’ study technique. Medical Education, 36(5), 426–431.
Gouveia, V., & Valadares, J. (2004). Concept maps and the didactic role of assessment. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Concept Mapping.
Harrell, M. (2008). iLogos. Retrieved 7/11/08, from http://www.phil.cmu.edu/projects/argument_mapping/.
Harrell, M. (2011). Argument diagramming and critical thinking in introductory philosophy. Higher Education Research and Development, forthcoming.
Hay, D., Kinchin, I., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295–311.
Hay, D., Wells, H., & Kinchin, I. (Forthcoming). Using concept maps to measure learning quality. Higher Education.
Hoffman, E., Trott, J., & Neely, K. P. (2002). Concept mapping: A tool to bridge the disciplinary divide. Amercian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 187(September), S41–S43.
Horn, R. E. (1998). Mapping great debates: Can computers think? bainbridge island. WA: MacroVU Press.
Irvine, H., Cooper, K., & Jones, G. (2005, 24th–25th November). Concept mapping to enhance student learning in a financial accounting subject. Paper presented at the Accounting Educators’ Forum, Sydney, NSW. Available from.
Jackson, K., & Trochim, W. (2002). Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 307–336.
Jarvis, P. (1992). Paradoxes of learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jonassen, D. H., Reeves, T. C., Hong, N., Harvey, D., & Peters, K. (1997). Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3–4), 289–308.
Kinchin, I. M. (2000). Concept mapping in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 61–68.
Kinchin, I. (2001). If concept mapping is so helpful to learning biology why aren’t we all doing it? International Journal of Science Education, 12, 1257–1269.
King, M., & Shell, R. (2002). Teaching and evaluating critical thinking with concept maps. Nurse Educator, 27(5), 214–216.
Kolb, D., & Fry, R. (1975). Towards an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group processes. London: Wiley and Sons.
Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, J. B., & Caterino, L. C. (1985). Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 683–699.
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100.
Leauby, B. A., & Brazina, P. (1998). Concept mapping: Potential uses in accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(1), 123–138.
List of Concept Mapping Software. (2008). Retrieved 30th November, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_concept_mapping_software&oldid=139133393.
List of Mind Mapping Software. (2008). Retrieved 29 October, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_mind_mapping_software&oldid=139428677.
Maas, J., & Leauby, B. A. (2005). Concept mapping: Exploring its value as a meaningful learning tool in accounting education. Global Perspectives of Accounting Education, 2, 75–98.
Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91–101.
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning, i-outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning, ii-outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(December), 715–726.
McClain, A. (1987). Improving lectures: Challenging both sides of the brain. Journal of Optometric Education, 13(Summer), 18–12.
McGaghie, W. C., McCrimmon, D. R., Mitchell, G., Thompson, J. A., & Ravitch, M. (2000). Quantitative concept mapping in pulmonary physiology: Comparison of student and faculty knowledge structures. Advances in Physiology Education, 23(1), 72–81.
Mealy, D. L., & Nist, S. L. (1989). Postsecondary teacher directed comprehension strategies. Journal of Reading, 32(6), 484–493.
Mento, A., Martinelli, P., & Jones, R. M. (1999). Mind mapping in executive education: Applications and outcomes. Journal of Management Development, 18(4), 390–407.
Mind Maps Made With Mind Mapping Tool. 8/3/2010, from http://www.mindmapexample.com/samples.php.
Nassi, I., & Shneiderman, B. (1973). Flowchart techniques for structured programming. SIGPLAN Notices, 8(8).
Nettleship, J. (1992). Active learning in economics: Mind maps and wall charts. Economics, 28(Summer), 69–71.
Novak, J. D. (1981). Applying learning psychology and philosophy to biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 43(1), 12/20.
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-01 Retrieved 21/6/07, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, from http://cmap.ihmcus/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cornell University Press.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
Paivio, A. (1983). The empirical case for dual coding. In J. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory and cognition. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pressley, M., Van Etten, S., Yokoi, L., Freebern, G., & VanMeter, P. (1998). The metacognition of college studentship: A grounded theory approach. In J. D. D. J. Hacker & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in theory and practice (pp. 347–367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Rochecouste, J. (2005). Constructing taxonomies for student writing. Paper presented at the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing. from http://eataw2005.hau.gr/pages/about.htm.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569–600.
Safayeni, F., Derbentseva, N., & Canas, A. J. (2005). A theoretical note on concepts and the need for cyclic concept maps. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 741–766.
Schau, C., & Mattern, N. (1997). Use of map Techniques in teaching applied statistics courses. The American Statistician, 51(May), 171–175.
Schuster, P. M. (2000). Concept mapping: Reducing clinical care plan paperwork and increasing learning. Nurse Educator, 25(2), 76–81.
Schwartz, N. H. (1988). Cognitive processing characteristics of maps: Implications for instruction. Educational and Psychological Research, 8, 93–101.
Simon, J. (2007). concept mapping in a financial accounting theory course. Accounting Education, 16(3), 272–308.
Slotte, V., & Lonka, K. (1999). spontaneous concept maps aiding the understanding of scientific concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 515–531.
Software for Mind mapping and Information Storage. (2008). Retrieved 30th October, from http://www.mind-mapping.org/.
Trochim, W. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1–16.
Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed. ed.). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Twardy, C. (2004). Argument maps improve critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy, 27(2), 95–116.
van der Laan, S., & Dean, G. (2006). Assessment to Encourage Meaningful Learning in Groups: Concept Mapping,. NZ: AAFANZ SIG Wellington.
van Gelder, T. (2001). How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. Paper presented at the Meeting at the Crossroads: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, University of Melbourne. Available from.
van Gelder, T. (2007). The rationale for Rationale™. Law, Probability and Risk, 6, 23–42.
van Gelder, T., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Enhancing expertise in informal reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 142–152.
Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 261–312.
Walker, J., & King, P. (2002). Concept mapping as a form of student assessment and instruction. Paper presented at the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Available from.
West, D. C., Pomeroy, J. R., & Park, J. K. (2000). Critical thinking in graduate medical education: A role for concept mapping assessment. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(9), 1105–1110.
Wilkes, L., Cooper, K., Lewin, J., & Batts, J. (1999). Concept mapping: Promoting science learning in bn learners in Australia. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 30(1), 37–44.
Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 211–247.
Zeilik, M. (nd). Classroom assessment techniques: Concept mapping. Retrieved 8/3/2010, from http://www.flaguide.org/cat/conmap/conmap1.php.
My thanks to Tim Beaumont and two anonymous reviewers from the journal for useful comments on earlier versions of this paper.
About this article
Cite this article
Davies, M. Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter?. High Educ 62, 279–301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
- Concept mapping
- Mind mapping
- Computer-aided argument mapping
- Critical thinking
- Knowledge mapping