Higher Education

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 261–275 | Cite as

Differentiation and social selectivity in German higher education

Article

Abstract

In this paper we investigate social selectivity in access to higher education in Germany and, unlike most previous studies, explicitly devote attention to semi-tertiary institutions such as the so-called universities of cooperative education. Drawing on rational choice models of educational decisions we seek to understand which factors influence upper secondary graduates from different social backgrounds in their choices of diverse tertiary institutions in Germany. We find that scholastic performance, expected job security, study duration, monetary costs and preferences for study content considerably contribute to the creation of socially selective choice patterns of post-secondary careers. The characteristics of semi-tertiary institutions—such as universities of cooperative education that combine firm-based training with tertiary education—constitute a potential alternative that could reduce inequities in access to higher learning.

Keywords

Higher education Differentiation Social inequality Social class 

References

  1. Becker, R., & Hecken, A. E. (2009). Higher education or vocational training?: An empirical test of the rational action model of educational choices suggested by Breen and Goldthorpe and Esser. Acta Sociologica, 52(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity and social inequality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials—towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Explaining class inequality in education: the Swedish test case. In R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective (pp. 1–63). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fairlie, R. W. (2005). An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 30(4), 305–316.Google Scholar
  6. Heine, C., Spangenberg, H., & Willich, J. (2008). Studienberechtigte 2006 ein halbes Jahr nach Schulabschluss. Hannover: HIS.Google Scholar
  7. Heublein, U., Schmelzer, R., & Sommer, D. (2005). Studienabbruchstudie 2005. Hannover: HIS.Google Scholar
  8. Heublein, U., Schmelzer, R., Sommer, D., & Spangenberg, H. (2002). Studienabbruchstudie 2002. HIS Kurzinformation, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Hillmert, S., & Jacob, M. (2003). Social inequality in higher education. Is vocational training a pathway leading to or away from University? European Sociological Review, 19(3), 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hillmert, S., & Kröhnert, S. (2003). Differenzierung und Erfolg tertiärer Ausbildungen: die Berufsakademie im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 17(2), 195–214.Google Scholar
  11. Huismann, J. (1995). Differentiation, diversity, and dependency in higher education: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Utrecht: Lemma.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, M., Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Yaish, M. (2007). Primary and secondary effects in class differentials in educational attainment: The transition to A-level courses in England and Wales. Acta Sociologica, 50(3), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maaz, K. (2006). Soziale Herkunft und Hochschulzugang. Effekte institutioneller Öffnung im Bildungssystem. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  14. Maaz, K., Chang, P.-H., & Köller, O. (2004). Führt institutionelle Vielfalt zur Öffnung im Bildungssystem? Sozialer Hintergrund und kognitive Grundfähigkeit der Schülerschaft an allgemein bildenden und beruflichen Gymnasien. In O. Köller, R. Watermann, U. Trautwwein, & O. Lüdtke (Eds.), Wege zur Hochschulreife in Baden-Württemberg. TOSCA—Eine Untersuchung an allgemein bildenden und beruflichen Gymnasien (pp. 13–28). Opladen: Leske und Budrich.Google Scholar
  15. Mayer, K. U., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2007). Germany: institutional change and inequalities of access in higher education. In Y. Shavit, R. Arum, & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Stratification in higher education. A comparative study (pp. 240–265). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Müller, W., Brauns, H., & Steinmann, S. (2002). Expansion und Erträge tertiärer Bildung in Deutschland, Frankreich und im Vereinigten Königreich. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 12(1), 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Müller, W., Pollak, R., Reimer, D., & Schindler, S. (2009). Hochschulbildung und soziale Ungleichheit. In R. Becker (Ed.), Lehrbuch der Bildungssoziologie: Fragestellungen, Theorien und empirische Befunde (pp. 281–320). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  18. Reimer, D., & Pollak, R. (2010). Educational expansion and its consequences for vertical and horizontal inequalities in access to higher education in West Germany. European Sociological Review, 26(4), 415–430.Google Scholar
  19. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2008a). Bildung und Kultur: Nichtmonetäre hochschulstatistische Kennzahlen 1980–2007. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  20. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2008b). Bildung und Kultur: Studierende an Hochschulen Wintersemester 2007/2008. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  21. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2008c). Fachserie 11/Reihe 1: Bildung und Kultur—Allgemeinbildende Schulen. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  22. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2008d). Fachserie 11/Reihe 2: Bildung und Kultur—Berufliche Schulen. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  23. Teichler, U. (1988). Changing patterns of the higher education system. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Trautwein, U., Maaz, K., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., Husemann, N., Watermann, R., et al. (2006). Studieren an der Berufsakademie oder an der Universität, Fachhochschule oder Pädagogischen Hochschule? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(3), 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trow, M. (2005). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In P. G. Altbach & J. J. F. Forest (Eds.), International handbook of higher education. Part one: Global themes and contemporary challenges (pp. 243–280). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Mannheim, Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES)MannheimGermany
  2. 2.Aarhus University, School of EducationCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations