Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reshaping academic capitalism to meet development priorities: the case of public universities in Kenya

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As colleges and universities have adopted a corporate model in recent decades, debate over the public versus private good associated with higher education has surged. The deliberations have typically been entrenched in Western notions about academia’s contributions to development and scholars have framed academic capitalism dichotomously; a force for good or evil. Far less is known about the market model of higher education in developing nations. We sought to explore this gap by examining how faculty and staff at two public universities in Africa view the intersection of marketization and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altbach, P. (2001). Higher education and the WTO: Globalization run amok. International Higher Education (23), 2–4.

  • Altbach, P. (2005). Patterns in higher education development. In R. Berdahl, P. Altbach, & P. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 15–38). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banya, K., & Elu, J. (2001). The World Bank and financing higher education in Sub-Saharan Africa. Higher Education, 42, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, P. (2001). Reframing access and opportunity: Problematic state and federal higher education policy in the 1990s. In D. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability (pp. 83–99). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2001). Globalization, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (1997). Higher education markets and public policy. Higher Education Quaterly, 10(3/4), 161–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (2003). Allowing the markets to rule: The Case of the United States. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2), 136–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. (2005). The ten generations of American higher education. In R. Berdahl, P. Altbach, & P. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 38–70). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorostiaga, X. (1999). In search of the missing link between education and development. In P. Albach (Ed.), Private Prometheus: Private higher education and development in the twenty-first Century (pp. 101–112). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. (2000). Academic restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher Education, 39(1), 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2002). The case for cross-disciplinary approaches in international development. World Development, 3(2), 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauptman, A. (2001). Reforming the ways in which states finance higher education. In D. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability (pp. 64–81). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D., & Rogers, K. (2006). Shifting the burden: Public and private financing of higher education in the United States and implications for Europe. Tertiary Education and Management, 12(2), 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, D. (2004). The economics and politics of cost sharing in higher education: Comparative perspectives. Economics of Education Review, 23, 403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, D. (2005). Financing higher education: Who should pay? In R. Berdahl, P. Altbach, & P. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 369–392). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenya. n.d.. Retrieved February 12 (2009) from The International Comparative Higher Education Finance and Accessibility Project. University of Buffalo Web site: www.gse.buffalo.edu/org/inthigheredfiance/region_africa_Kenya.

  • Kerr, C. (1994). Troubled times for American higher education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2004). Obtaining integrity? Reviewing and examining the charter between higher education and society. The Review of Higher Education, 27(4), 429–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., Lester, J., Carducci, R., Gallant, T. B., & McGavin, M. C. (2007). Where are the faculty leaders? Liberal Education, 93(4), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobia, M., & Mohammed, N. (2006). The Kenyan experience with performance contracting. Paper presented at the 28th annual roundtable conference of the African Association for Public Administration and Management, December 48, in Arusha, Tanzania.

  • Lawrence, S., & Sharma, U. (2002). Commodification of education and academic labor—Using the Balanced Scorecard in a university setting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 661–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketization: The implications for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2007). Scholars in the marketplace: The dilemmas of neo-liberal reform at Makerere University, 1989–2005. Dakar, Senegal: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, M., Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2008). The state-sponsored student entrepreneur. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 638–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, E. (2004). Tribe or nation? Nation building and public goods in Kenya versus Tanzania. World Politics, 56(3), 327–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2000). Impact of globalization: A study of quality assurance systems of higher education in Hong Kong and Singapore. Comparative Education Review, 44(2), 148–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngome, C. (2003). Kenya. The Boston College Center for International Higher Education Web site, http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/inhea/profiles/Kenya.htm (accessed February 12, 2009).

  • Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public service: The Anglo-American experience. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002). Quality assurance in Europe and the US: Professional and political economic framing of higher education policy. Higher Education, 43(3), 355–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (2004). Academic capitalism in the new economy: Challenges and choices. American Academic, 37–59.

  • Rhoades, G., Maldonado-Maldonado, A., Ordorika, I., & Velazquez, M. (2004). Imagining alternativas to global, corporate, new economy academic capitalism. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 316–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G., & Rallis, S. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert, S. (1997). Roots and realities of state-level performance indicator systems. In L. Goodchild, C. Lovell, E. Hines, & J. Gill (Eds.), Public policy and higher education: ASHE readers series (pp. 315–324). Arlington, VA: Pearson Custom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (2001). Professional values and the allure of the market. Academe, http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2001/SO/Feat/slau.htm (accessed February 12, 2009).

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (2001). Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism. Organization, 8(2), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, states, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2005). Markets in higher education: Students in the seventies, patents in the eighties, copyrights in the nineties. In R. Berdahl, P. Altbach, & P. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 486–516). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. Corruption perceptions index. http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2008/cpi2008/cpi_2008_table (accessed February 12, 2009).

  • United Nations Development Program (2008) Human development indices: A statistical update—HDI rankings. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/ (accessed February 12, 2009).

  • Vidovich, L. (2002). Quality assurance in Australian higher education: Globalization and ‘steering at a distance’. Higher Education, 43(3), 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2004). Openness and reform as dynamics for development: A case study of internationalization at South China University of Technology. Higher Education, 47(4), 473–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R. (2004). The dog that doesn’t bark: Why markets neither limit prices nor promote educational quality. In J. Burke & Associates (Eds.), Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic, and market demands (pp. 275–295). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumeta, W. (2001). Public policy and accountability in higher education: Lessons from the past and present for the new millennium. In D. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability (pp. 155–197). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zusman, I. (2001). Challenges facing higher education in the Twenty-First Century. In R. Berdahl, P. Altbach, & P. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 115–160). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ane Turner Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, A.T., Hirt, J.B. Reshaping academic capitalism to meet development priorities: the case of public universities in Kenya. High Educ 61, 483–499 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9342-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9342-6

Keywords

Navigation