Skip to main content
Log in

Economies of scale and scope in Australian higher education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper estimates economies of scale and scope for 36 Australian universities using a multiple-input, multiple-output cost function over the period 1998–2006. The three inputs included in the analysis are full-time equivalent academic and non-academic staff and physical capital. The five outputs are undergraduate, postgraduate and PhD completions, national competitive and industry grants, and publications. The findings indicate that ray economies of scale hold up to about 120% of current mean output though product-specific economies of scale hold only for undergraduate teaching. Global economies of scope prevail in the sector, increasing with the level of mean output, while product-specific economies of scope arise for all outputs except publications. A cost efficiency index constructed using the sector benchmark indicates that the universities of Ballarat, Southern Cross and Flinders have a high level of cost efficiency, while New South Wales, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and James Cook are cost inefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, 22, 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. (2007). Bishop plan to cut unis. The Australian, April 11.

  • Australian Government. (2008). Review of Australian higher education final report. Available at www.deewr.gov.au/. Accessed April, 2010.

  • Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35, 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, R., Coelli, T., & Rao, P. (2005). The performance of Australian universities: Conceptual issues and preliminary results. Economic Papers, 24, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, E., & Geske, T. G. (1990). The economics of education (3rd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, E., Rhine, S. L. W., & Santos, M. C. (1989). Institutions of higher education as multi-product firms: Economies of scale and scope. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, H., McMahon, W. W., & Volkwein, J. F. (1991). The cost structure of American research universities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 424–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Science and Technology. (2006). Higher education research data collection specifications for the collection of 2005 data. Available at http://www.dest.gov.au/. Accessed June, 2006.

  • Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1995). Departmental productivity in American universities: Economies of scale and scope. Economics of Education Review, 14, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flegg, A. T., Allen, D. O., Field, K., & Thurlow, T. W. (2004). Measuring the efficiency of British universities: A multi-period data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 12, 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, K., & Cohn, E. (1997). Economies of scale and scope in Japanese private universities. Education Economics, 5, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, G. (2008). No merger but unis debate systems, The Australian, July 16.

  • Izadi, H., Johnes, G., Oskrochi, R., & Crouchley, R. (2002). Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: The case of higher education in Britain. Economics of Education Review, 21, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J. (2006). Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 25, 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, G., Johnes, J., & Thanassoulis, E. (2008). An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (1995). Quality and economies of scale in higher education. Applied Economics, 27, 773–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (1999). Economies of scale and scope in higher education: A case of comprehensive universities. Economics of Education Review, 18, 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (2000). Do liberal arts colleges exhibit economies of scale and scope? Education Economics, 8, 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D. N., & Lentz, B. F. (2003). New estimates of economies of scale and scope in higher education. Southern Economic Journal, 70, 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, P. (2007). The cost structure of higher education colleges in England. Economics of Education Review, 27, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. R., & Dundar, H. (1995). Economies of scale and scope in Turkish universities. Education Economics, 3, 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P. J., Morgan, M. H., & Williams, R. A. (1993). Amalgamations of universities: Are there economies of scale or scope? Applied Economies, 25, 1081–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G., Savage, S., & Kemp, S. (1997). Measuring public sector efficiency: A study of economics departments in Australian universities. Education Economics, 5, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, M. L., & Chan, W. H. (2006). University efficiency: A comparison and consolidation of results from stochastic and non-stochastic methods. Education Economics, 14, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G. (1999). Too many campuses spoil the system, The Australian, December 8.

  • O’Connell, J. F., & Perkins, G. M. (2003). The economics of private liberal arts colleges. Journal of Business, 76, 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sav, G. T. (2004). Higher education costs and scale and scope economies. Applied Economics, 36, 607–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. A. (2005). A stochastic frontier analysis of English and Welsh universities. Education Economics, 13, 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1986). Cost functions for Australian universities. Australian Economic Papers, 25, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trounson, A. (2008). La Trobe to offer redundancies, The Australian, November 12.

  • Universities Australia (2008) Universities Australia Submission to the Review of Australian Higher Education. Available at http://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/. Accessed April, 2010.

  • Worthington, A. C. (2001). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics, 9, 245–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, A. C., & Lee, B. L. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998–2003. Economics of Education Review, 27, 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Worthington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Worthington, A.C., Higgs, H. Economies of scale and scope in Australian higher education. High Educ 61, 387–414 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9337-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9337-3

Keywords

Navigation