Abstract
Formally the new public management model of governance was introduced into British higher education with the passage of the 1988 Education Reform Act, which abolished the existing University Grants Committee (UGC) and instigated the funding councils. This article explores the relationship between the state, the funding councils and the universities with respect to the contemporary development of the English system of higher education. The analysis is based on an exploration of four key policy issues: the quality assurance regime, the research assessment exercises, the widening participation agenda and the introduction of student fees. The goal is to explore how the quasi-state organisations—in particular the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)—have mediated the relationship between the state and the universities. The evidence suggests that the coupling of the state to the universities follows one of three tracks: compliance, resistance and seduction. The article explores what factors determine why one relationship (or combination of relationships) prevails, and explains patterns of change over time. The overall conclusion is that institutional interaction is very complex, and it is inaccurate—as is sometimes claimed—to view the funding council as little more than a compliant channel of government policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral, A., Jones, G., & Karseth, B. (Eds.). (2002). Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. Dordecht: Kluwer.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review, 57, 641–651.
Baty, P. (2003). Watchdog mauls LBS and Cambridge quality, Times Higher Education Supplement, 56.
Berdahl, R. O. (1959). British universities and the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berdahl, R. O. (1990). Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169–180.
Caldwell, D. (2001). Higher education in Scotland: Diversity, distinctiveness and devolution. In D. Warner & D. Palfreyman (Eds.), The state of UK higher education: Managing change and diversity (pp. 67–75). Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
Carswell, J. (1985). The Government and the Universities in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, B. R. (1979). The many pathways of academic coordination. Higher Education, 8(3), 251–267.
Corbyn, Z. (2009). Research elite fear Hefce may approach funding formula with a ‘straight bat’, Times Higher Education, 4–5.
Education Reform Act. (1988) Chapter 40.
Greenaway, D., & Haynes, M. (2000). Funding universities to meet national and international challenges. London: The Russell Group.
Huisman, J. (2009). International perspectives on the governance of higher education. New York, Routledge: Taylor and Francis.
Joint Funding Councils (Roberts Review). (2003). Review of research assessment. Bristol: Joint Funding Councils.
Kogan, M., & Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Moodie, G. C. (1983). Buffer, coupling and broker: Reflections on 60 years of the UGC. Higher Education, 12, 331–347.
National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (Dearing Report). (1997). Higher education in the learning society. Norwich: HMSO.
Owen, T. (1980). The university grants committee. Oxford Review of Education, 6(3), 225–278.
Quality Assurance Agency. (2005). Review of the quality assurance framework. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
Russell, C. (1993). Academic freedom. London: Routledge.
Salter, B., & Tapper, T. (1994). The state and higher education. Ilford: Woburn Press.
Scott, P. (1995). The meaning of mass higher education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
Shattock, M. (1994). The UGC and the management of British universities. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
Shattock, M. (2008). The change from private to public governance of British higher education: Its consequences for higher education policy making 1980–2006. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(3), 181–203.
Shinn, C. (1986). Paying the piper: The development of the UGC, 1919–46. Lewes: Falmer Press.
Tapper, T. (2007). The governance of British higher education: The struggle for policy control. Dordrecht: Springer.
Tysome, T. (1988). Quality lockout, Times Higher Education Supplement, 2.
Williams, P. (2005) Make no mistake, the QAA will tell it like it is, Times Higher Education Supplement, 14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filippakou, O., Salter, B. & Tapper, T. Compliance, resistance and seduction: reflections on 20 years of the funding council model of governance. High Educ 60, 543–557 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9314-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9314-x