Higher Education

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 69–83 | Cite as

Judging plagiarism: a problem of morality and convention

Article

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of plagiarism as an issue of morality. Outrage about student plagiarism in universities positions it as dishonesty and a transgression of standards. Despite this, there has been little work analysing the implications of positioning plagiarism as a moral matter in the making of judgments about plagiarism and academic dishonesty. This paper sets the scene by reviewing research about the characteristics of students who cheat and analysing student and lecturer differences. It then discusses perspectives from moral behaviour, moral philosophy and moral reasoning. The paper concludes that emotion and reason are brought to moral judgments, and so makes a case for those who are making judgments about plagiarism to reflect on whether they are faced with a matter of morality or convention. Greater awareness of the domains of convention and morality, the issues of justice and care, the roles of emotion and reason and what is involved in making judgments, will open ways of understanding reactions to plagiarism so that better ways to deal with accusations and make judgments can be developed.

Keywords

Convention and morality Justice and care Moral judgments Lecturer interests Plagiarism 

References

  1. Atkins, J., & Herfel, W. (2005). Counting beans in the degree factory (some practical meta-ethical reflections on academic integrity in Australian universities). International Journal of Educational Integrity, 2(1), 3–12. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/index.
  2. Bretag, T. (2005). Implementing plagiarism policy in the internationalised university, refered paper presented at the 2nd Asia-Pacific Educational Integrity Conference, 2–3 December. University of Newcastle. Retrieved May 1, 2007, from http://www.newcastle.edu.au/conference/apeic/papers.html.
  3. Buckingham, J., & Nevile, M. (1997). Comparing the citation choices of experienced academic writers and first year students. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and Practice of Tertiary Literacy: Selected Proceedings of the First National conference on Tertiary Literacy: Research and Practice.Google Scholar
  4. Casebeer, W., & Churchland, P. (2003). The neural mechanisms of moral cognition: A multiple-aspect approach to moral judgment and decision-making. Biology and Philosophy, 18, 169–194. Retrieved May 1, 2007 from http://springerlink.metapress.com/journals/. doi:10.1023/A:1023380907603.
  5. Dick, M., Sheard, J., Bareiss, C., Carter, J., Joyce, D., Harding, H., et al. (2005). Addressing student cheating: Definitions and solutions, Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 45–49, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2003. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=961527.
  6. East, J. (2005). Proper acknowledgment? Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, Academic Integrity Issue, 2(3a), 1–11. Retrieved April 14, 2007 from http://jutlp.uow.edu.au.
  7. Evans, R. (2006). Evaluating an electronic plagiarism detection service. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 87–89. Retrieved April 30, 2007 from http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk/conference2006/documents/papers/2006papers01.pdf.
  8. Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans). Middlesex: Penguin Books. Original work published 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Greene, J. (2003). From neural ‘is’ to moral ‘ought’: what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 847–850. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v4/n10/index.html.
  11. Greene, J., Nystrom, L., Engell, A., Darley, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.neuron.org/content/issue?volume=44&issue=2.
  12. Hall, B. (2006). Australia needs an office of academic integrity. eMJA, 185(11/12), 619–622. Retrieved April 14, 2007 from https://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/185_11_041206/hal10753_fm.html.
  13. Heckman, S. (1995). Moral voices, moral selves. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Howard, R. M. (2000). Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62(4), 473–491. Retrieved April 11, 2005 from http://www.jstor.org/view/00100994/ap020471/02a00020/0.
  15. Kiehl, E. (2006). Using an ethical decision-making model to determine consequences for student plagiarism, faculty forum. The Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 199–202.Google Scholar
  16. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  17. La Trobe University (2007). Part of la Trobe University’s Academic Misconduct Policy Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.latrobe.edu.au/policies/academicmisconduct.pdf.
  18. Lambert, E., Hogan, N., & Barton, S. (2003). Collegiate academic dishonesty revisited: What have they done, How often have they done it, who does it, and why did they do it? Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7(4), 1–27. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.sociology.org/.Google Scholar
  19. Le Heron, J. (2001). Plagiarism, learning dishonesty or just plain cheating: The context and countermeasures in information systems teaching. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3), 244–264. Retrieved July 28, 2003 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet17/leheron.html.
  20. Le Phan Ha (2006). Plagiarism and overseas students: Stereotypes again? ELT Journal, 60(1), 76–78. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/60/1/76.
  21. Lester, M., & Diekhoff, G. (2003). A comparison of traditional and internet cheaters. Journal of College Student Development, 43(6), 906–911.Google Scholar
  22. Lim, C., & Coalter, T. (2006). Academic integrity: An instructor’s obligation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(20), 155–159. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.isetl.org/ijthe/.Google Scholar
  23. Magnus, J., Polterovich, V., Danilova, D., & Savvateev, A. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: An analysis across countries. The Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCabe, D., & Drinan, P. (1999). Toward a culture of academic integrity. Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct 15, 46, 8. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/7628/20808/00963948.pdf.
  25. Murphy, R. (1990). Anorexia: The cheating disorder. College English, 52(8), 898–903. doi:10.2307/377394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nadelson, S. (2007). Academic misconduct by university students: Faculty perceptions and responses. Plagiary: Cross Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 2(2). Retrieved November 22, 2007 from http://www.plagiary.org/index.htm.
  27. Nelson, W. (1991). Morality, what’s in it for me: A historical introduction to ethics. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  28. Nillsen, R. (2005). The concept of integrity in teaching and learning. JUTLP, 2(3b), 85–93. Retrieved March 12, 2007 from http://jutlp.uow.edu.au.
  29. Oregon State University (2007). Office of student conduct. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://oregonstate.edu/admin/stucon/plag.htm.
  30. O’Regan, K. (2006). Policing—or, at least, policying—plagiarism at one Australian University. JUTLP, 3(2), 114–123. Retrieved January 20, 2007 from http://jutlp.uow.edu.au.
  31. Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students—literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5). Retrieved September 10, 2008 from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/staff/gyaccp/caeh_28_5_02lores.pdf.
  32. Phillips, D. Z. (2001). Ethics, faith and ‘what can be said’. In H. Glock (Ed.), Wittgenstein: A critical reader. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-kohlbergian approach. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Rhees, R. (1970). Discussions of Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
  35. Sheard, J., Markham, S., & Dick, M. (2003). Investigating differences in cheating behaviours of IT undergraduate and graduate students: The maturity and motivation factors. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 91–108. doi:10.1080/0729436032000056526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shweder, R., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–82). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2004). Pandora’s box: Academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 83–95. Retrieved November 11, 2006 from http://0-www.sciencedirect.com.alpha2.latrobe.edu.au/science/journal/14751585.
  38. Symposium on Promoting Academic Integrity (2004). 24th & 25th November, University of Newcastle. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.newcastle.edu.au/service/academic-integrity/academicintegritysymposium/index.html.
  39. The University of Melbourne (2007a). Nine principles. Learning and teaching. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.unimelb.edu.au/student/nineprinciples.html.
  40. The University of Melbourne (2007b). Attributes of the Melbourne graduate. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.unimelb.edu.au/student/attributes.html.
  41. The University of Sydney (2007). Academic honesty. Assessment policies. Retrieved May 14, 2007 from http://www.it.usyd.edu.au/current_students/undergrad/policies/academic_honesty.shtml.
  42. Thorne, S., & Lantolf, J. (2007). A linguistics of communicative activity. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 170–195). Cleveland: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
  43. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Turiel, E., Hildebrandt, C., & Wainryb, C. (1991). Judging social issues: Difficulties, inconsistencies, and consistencies. In B. Kahn (Ed.), Monographs of the society for research in child development (Vol. 2). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.La Trobe UniversityBundooraAustralia

Personalised recommendations