Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 57, Issue 6, pp 703–721 | Cite as

Imported talents: demographic characteristics, achievement and job satisfaction of foreign born full time faculty in four-year American colleges

Article

Abstract

The information-based economy globalizes the competition for talents and has changed the nature of international migration in recent decades. The rise of America has historically benefited from imported talents, and higher education has played a crucial role. By using 2004 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF04), this research tries to reexamine the roles of foreign born faculty in four-year American colleges after September 11. Descriptive statistics and discriminant analysis demonstrate that foreign born faculty occupy a special niche in the American four-year colleges. We argue that American higher education still needs imported talents, especially in the areas of pure and applied sciences.

Keywords

Foreign born faculty Immigration Achievement Job satisfaction Higher education Four year college 

References

  1. Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G. (1995). Problems and possibilities: The US academic profession. Studies in Higher Education, 20(1), 27–44.Google Scholar
  3. Altbach, P. G. (2004). Higher education crosses borders: Can the United States remain the top destination for foreign students? Change, 36(2), 18–24.Google Scholar
  4. Altschuld, R. A. (2003). US Science Education: The view from a practicing scientist. Review of Policy Research, 20(4), 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldoz, R. (2004). Valorizing racial boundaries: Hegemony and conflict in the racialization of Filipino migrant labor in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(6), 969–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkan, E. (2003). Return of the nativists? California opinion and immigration in the 1980s and 1990s. Social Science History, 27(2), 229–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, R., Carr, P., Boisnier, A., Ashe, A., Friedman, R., Moskowitz, M., et al. (1998). Relationships in gender and career motivation to medical faculty members’ production of academic publications. Academic Medicine, 73(2), 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bean, F., & Stevens, G. (2003). America’s newcomers and the dynamics of diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Benjamin, R. (2003). The environment of American higher education: A constellation of changes. The Annals of the American Academy of Politics and Social Science, 585, 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bloom, M., & Klein, W. (1995). Publications and citations: The state of faculty at leading schools of social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 377–387.Google Scholar
  12. Bowen, H. R., & Schuster, J. H. (1986). American Professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Buchen, I. H. (2003). Education in America: The next 25 years. Futurist, 37(1), 44–50.Google Scholar
  14. Cataldi, E. F., Bradburn, E. M., Fahimi, M., & Zimbler L. (2005a). Background characteristics, work activities, and compensation of instructional faculty and staff: Fall 2003. Washington: NECS Report.Google Scholar
  15. Cataldi, E. F., Bradburn, E. M., Fahimi, M. & Zimbler L. (2005b). 2004 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF:04) Report on faculty and institutional staff in Fall 2003. Washington: NECS ReportGoogle Scholar
  16. Chew, K., & Liu, J. (2004). Hidden in plain sight: Global labor force exchange in the Chinese American population, 1880–1940. Population and Development Review, 30(1), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davia, L., Freeman, P., Carter, L. H., & Cartwright, R. (1983). Black faculty in predominantly white schools of social work: a qualitative assessment, Journal of Education for Social Work, 19(1), 15–23. Google Scholar
  18. Dinnerstein, L., & Reimer, D. (1999). Ethnic Americans: A history of immigration (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fairweather, J. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Falk, W., Schulman, M., & Tickamyer, A. (Eds.). (2003). Communities of work: Rural restructuring in local and global contexts. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Federation for American Immigration Reform—FAIR (2005). Retrieved July 4, 2005 from http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersb1c7/.
  22. Finn, M. G. (2000). Stay rate of foreign doctorate recipients from U.S. universities. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.Google Scholar
  23. Garson G. D. (2006). Discriminant function analysis. At http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/discrim.htm.
  24. Gibbs, P., & Locke, B. (1989). Tenure and promotion in accredited graduate schools of social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 25(2), 126–133.Google Scholar
  25. Green, R. (1998). Faculty rank, effort, and success: A study of publications in professional journals. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(3), 415–426.Google Scholar
  26. Green, R., Bellin, M., & Baskind, F. (2002). Results of the doctoral faculty publication project: Journal article productivity and its correlates in the 1990s. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(1), 135–152.Google Scholar
  27. Green, R., Hutchinson, L., & Sar, B. (1992). The research productivity of social work doctoral graduates. Social Service Review, 66, 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hagan, J. M. (2004). Contextualizing immigrant labor market incorporation: Legal, demographic, and economic dimensions. Work and Occupations, 31(4), 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hendricks, L. (2001). The economic performance of immigrants: A theory of assertive matching. International Economic Review, 42(2), 417–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill, B. (1987). A profile of job satisfaction among faculty members of selected Oklahoma public junior community colleges. Dissertation Abstract International, 48, 546-A.Google Scholar
  31. Hunter, N. (2001). Immigrants on campus. The American Prospect, 12(20), 30.Google Scholar
  32. Jasso, G., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Smith, J. P. (2002). The earnings of U.S. immigrants: World skill prices, skill transferability and selectivity. New York: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  33. Jillson, C. (2004). Pursuing the American dream: Opportunities and exclusion over four centuries. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, J. M. & Regets M. C. (1998). International mobility of scientists and engineers to the United States—Brain drain or brain circulation? Issue brief, Division of Science Resources Studies, NSF 98-316, June 22.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, S. (2002). Do Asian American faculty face a glass ceiling in higher education? American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 695–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin, Z., & Nur-Awaleh, M. (2005). An exploration of faculty job satisfaction in American 4-year Universities: Gender, Race and Immigrant status. Paper Presented to International Comparative Education Society (CIES), Stanford University, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  37. Lin, Z., Pearce, R., & Wang, W. (2006). Imported talents: The pivotal role of immigrant intellect in American higher education. In 4th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education, January 6–9, 2006, Renaissance Ilikai Waikiki Hotel, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  38. Llorente, E. (2003). Coping with the crackdown: Arab and Hispanic immigrants have borne the brunt of tighter immigration policies. Hispanic, 16(11), 12.Google Scholar
  39. Locke, E. (1984). Job satisfaction. In M. Gruneberg & T. Wall (Eds.), Social psychology and organizational behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Martinez, R., Hernandez, A., & Aguirre, A. (1993). Latino faculty attitudes toward the workplace. Journal of the Association of Mexican American Educators, Special Theme Edition, 45–52.Google Scholar
  41. McLachlan, Geoffrey J. (2004). Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition. NY: Wiley-Interscience. (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics).Google Scholar
  42. Middaugh, M. (2001). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Miller, D. (1978). Criteria for appointment, promotion, and retention of faculty in graduate social work programs. Journal of Education for Social Work, 14(2), 74–81.Google Scholar
  44. National Science Board. (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 (Vols. 1 and 2). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  45. Nettles, T. M., Perna, L. W., Bradburn E., & Zimbler L. (2000). Salary, promotion, and tenure status of minority and women faculty in U.S. colleges and universities. Washington: Statistical Report, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  46. Paden, J., & Singer, P. (2003). America slams the door (on its foot): Washington’s destructive new visa policies. Foreign Affairs, 82(3), 8–14.Google Scholar
  47. Pang, B. C., & Appleton, N. (2004). Higher education as an immigration path for Chinese students and scholars. Qualitative Report, 9(3), 500–527.Google Scholar
  48. Park, S. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 46–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Passel, J., & Suro, R. (2005). Rise, peak, and decline: Trends in U.S. immigration 1992–2004. Washington: Pew Hispanic Center.Google Scholar
  50. Rajagopal, I., & Lin, Z. (1996). Hidden careerists in Canadian Universities. Higher Education, 24, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reys, R. E. (2000). Doctorates in mathematics education—An acute shortage. Notices of the AMS, 47(10), 1267–1270.Google Scholar
  52. Richmond, A. H. (1988). Immigration and ethnic conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  53. Schuster, J. K., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic works and careers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Seipel, M. (2003). Assessing publication for tenure. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(1), 79–88.Google Scholar
  55. Skolnik, M. (2000). Does counting publications provide any useful information about academic performance? Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(2), 15–25.Google Scholar
  56. Spooner, M., Spooner, F., Karvonen, M., & Algozzine, B. (2002). Contributing to the profession in meaningful ways. Action in Teacher Education, 24(3), 10–19.Google Scholar
  57. U.S. Census Bureau. (2004). The foreign born population in the United States: 2003. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Google Scholar
  58. van Tuberqen, F., Flap, H., & Maas, I. (2004). The economic incorporation of immigrants in 18 Western societies: Origin, destination, and community effects. American Sociological Review, 69(5), 704–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vecoli, R. (1996). The significance of immigration in the formation of an American identity. The History Teacher, 30(1), 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weaver, P. (1989). Job satisfaction level of marketing faculty. Journal of Marketing Education, 11(2), 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zinn, H. (2003). A people’s history of the United States: 1492–Present (perennial classics). New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Administration and Foundations, College of EducationIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  2. 2.Illinois Board of Higher EducationSpringfieldUSA
  3. 3.Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of EducationIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations