Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 57–69 | Cite as

Survey on the implementation of the Bologna process in Portugal

  • Amélia Veiga
  • Alberto AmaralEmail author
Article

Abstract

For several years Portuguese higher education institutions have been waiting for the legislation framework necessary for the implementation of the Bologna process. Such legislation was passed quite recently (2006) and has resulted in an unexpected flood of proposals presented at very short notice by higher education institutions to the Ministry. It is possible that such fast implementation rate corresponds to implementation “in form” rather than “in substance”, thus softening tensions between the European and the national and local levels. This hypothesis will be tested by analysing the outcomes of a survey conducted in all higher education institutions that have presented proposals of Bologna-type degree programmes or adaptations of old degree programmes to the new Bologna-type structure.

Keywords

Bologna process Curriculum design and development Higher education policy National systems of higher education 

References

  1. Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995). A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, November/December.Google Scholar
  2. Bernestein, B. (1996). Pedagogic, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Washington: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Bess, J. (1998). Teaching well: Do you have to be schizophrenic? Review of Higher Education, 22, 1–15.Google Scholar
  4. Bleiklie, I. (2005). Organizing higher education in a knowledge society. Higher Education, 49, 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleiklie, I., Høstaker, R., & Vabø, A. (2000). Policy and practice in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Bologna Follow-up Group. (2007). Bologna process stocktaking report. London: BFUG.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organisational pathways of transformation. Paris: International Association of University Press and Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, B. (2003). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Tertiary Education and Management, 9, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crosier, D., Purser, L., & Smidt, H. (2007). Trends V: Universities shaping the European higher education area. Belgium: European Universities Association.Google Scholar
  10. ESIB. (2007). Bologna with students eyes. London: ESIB.Google Scholar
  11. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1997). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. March, G. J., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions—the organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Moscati, R. (2006). University change: Italy and Europe. In Monitoring the reform of the higher education system in six Italian universities. Final results. Milan: University of Milano-Biccoca.Google Scholar
  14. Neave, G. (1986). On shifting sands: Changing priorities and perspectives in European higher Education 1984–1986. European Journal of Education, 21(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neave, G. (1992). On instantly consumable knowledge and snake oil. European Journal of Education, 27(1–2), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Neave, G. (2005). Europhiliacs, eurosceptics and europhobics: Higher education policy, values and institutional research. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olsen, J. P. (2002). The many faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 921–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Portugal. (2007). National report (Portugal) 2005–2007. Lisbon: Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  19. Reichert, S., & Tauch, C. (2005). Trends IV: European Universities implementing Bologna. Belgium: European University Association.Google Scholar
  20. Rhoades, G. (2007). Technology-enhanced course and Mode III organization of instructional work. Tertiary Education Management, 13, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Teichler, U. (2004). Interview by Amélia Veiga (conducted for the PhD project, Lisbon).Google Scholar
  22. Teixeira, P., & Amaral, A. (2007). Waiting for the tide to change? Strategies for survival of Portuguese private HEIs. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(2), 208–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Veiga, A., & Amaral, A. (2006a). The open method of co-ordination and the implementation of Bologna process. Tertiary Education Management, 12, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Veiga, A., & Amaral, A. (2006b, October). Policy implementation tools and European governance. Paper presented at the Douro VI Seminar, European Integration and Higher Education Governance, Pinhão, Douro, Portugal.Google Scholar
  25. Whitchurch, C. (2006). Professional managers in UK higher education: Preparing for complex futures (interim report). In Research and development series. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research on Higher Education Policies and Universidade do PortoMatosinhosPortugal

Personalised recommendations