Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

UK university leaders at the turn of the 21st century: changing patterns in their socio-demographic characteristics

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While not the only title used by UK university leaders, the term Vice Chancellor will be used throughout this paper to include the other titles used (including Rector, Provost, Principal and President). According to data obtained pre-1997, UK Vice Chancellors (VCs) were predominantly scientists, largely former professors, Pro-VCs or deputy directors in universities, with only a few recruited from industry or the civil service. There have been changes in the fundamental demands being placed on UK universities in the recent past and the aim of our study was to explore if there had been changes in the socio-demographic characteristics of UK VCs since 1996. Our analysis of data available in the public domain on VCs appointed between 1997 and 2006 established that several changes had occurred. Most interestingly, we report an increase in the numbers of women and social scientists, and an increase in the age at which appointments are made. We also report an increase in appointments to universities established post-1992 of academics previously working in institutions established pre-1992.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Our definition of postgraduate experience refers to a postgraduate qualification; it does not include employment experience as a postgraduate.

  2. This analysis did not include the data for post-2003s.

References

  • ACE. (2007). The American College President, 2007 Edition. Washington: American Council on Education.

  • Bargh, C., Bocock, J., Scott, P. & Smith, D. (2000). University Leadership: The role of the chief executive. Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press

  • Becker, J. (2000). Vice-chancellors as chief executive officers. Armidale, NSW: University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, F. (1993). Women and maundering in higher education. In: P. M. Turner. (Ed.), Cracking the wall: Women in higher education administration. Washington, D.C.: College and University Personnel Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2007). Effective leadership in higher education: Summary of findings. London: Leadership Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, A. A., & Lubatkin, M. (1993). Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 763–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Higher Education (1963). Higher Education Report of the Committee Appointed by the Prime Minister under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins, 1961–1963. London, HMSO

  • Dearlove, J. (1998). The deadly dull issue of university administration? Good governance, managerialism, and organising academic work. Higher Education Policy, 11, 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolton, P., & Ma, A. (2003). CEO pay in the public sector: The case of vice chancellors in UK universities.

  • Doyle, C., & Hind, P. (1998). Occupational stress, burnout and job status in female academics. Gender, Work and Organisation, 5, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drennan, L. T., & Beck, M. (2001). Teaching quality performance indicators–key influences on the UK universities' scores. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(2), 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Toit, A. (2000). Critic and citizen: The intellectual, transformation and academic freedom. Pretexts: Literary and Cultural studies, 9(1), 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazackerley, A. (2006). Struggle to fill V-C job vacancies. Times Higher Education Supplement. 21st July.

  • Goodall, A. H. (2006). Should top universities be led by top researchers and are they? Journal of Documentation, 62(3), 388–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant Thornton. (2005). What makes a good leader? UK: Grant Thornton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, E. (2002). Female academics in a knowledge production society. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(4), 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academic of Management Review, 9(1), 844–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmlich, D. L. (1976). Succession: A longitudinal look. Journal of Business Research, 4, 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2002). Emerging concepts of academic leadership and their implications for intra-institutional roles and relationships in higher education. European Journal of Education, 37(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, P. (1998). Transformation: The changing context of academia in post-apartheid South Africa. African Affairs, 97, 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, A. (1985). Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities.

  • Johnson, R. (2002). Learning to manage the university: Tales of training and experience. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, E. (2003). CEOs ‘more likely to be accountants. Retrieved 10/02/2006, from http://www.management-issues.com/display_page.asp?section=research&id=724#

  • Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J., Marks, A., Rowland, S., & Walker, M. (2001). Towards a new academic professionalism: A manifesto of hope. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22, 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, B. (2002). The recruitment and selection for Vice-Chancellors for Australian universities. Geelong Victoria: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, B., & Petzall, S. (2001). The appointment of Vice-Chancellors in Australian universities: A study of contemporary recruitment and selection practices. Retrieved 6/1/2006, 2006, from http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:AuM8Vmenny8J:www.cecc.com.au/clients/sob/r

  • O’Meara, B., & Petzall, S. (2003). The recruitment and selection of Vice-Chancellors for Australian universities: An overview. Paper presented at the Surfing the Waves: Management challenges, Management Solutions, Proceedings of the 17th ANZAM Conference (pp. 1–11). Fremantle, Western Australia: Edith Cowan University.

  • O’Meara, B., & Petzall, S. (2005). Vice Chancellors for the 21st century? A study of contemporary recruitment and selection practices in Australian Universities. Management Research News, 28(6), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, B., & Petzall, S. (2007). How important is the role of the chancellor in the appointment of Australian vice-chancellors and university governance. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(3), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1970). Organizational analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Mansfied, Mass.: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, D. J., & Sherman, H. (2003). The special challenges of academic leadership. Management Decision, 41(10), 1058–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (1995). The meanings of mass higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York: Doubleday-Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloper, D. W. (1994). The demographics of current vice-chancellors: A social characteristics profile. In The modern Vice-Chancellor (pp. 1–50). Canberra: AGPS.

  • Smith, D., Bargh, C., Bocock, J., & Scott, P. (1999). New leaders at the top? The educational and career paths of UK university Vice-chancellors (1960–1996). Higher Education Management, 11(2), 113–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, L. H. C. (2004a). How different are universities from companies? Financial reporting perspective and the market for vice-chancellors. (Honours dissertation, Bachelor of Commerce): University of Western Australia.

  • Soh, L. H. C. (2004b). The market for Vice-Chancellors. Retrieved 18/1/06, 2006, from http://www.clmr.ecel.uwa.edu.au/ASLE/workshop%20papers/Soh%20paper.pdf

  • Storey, J. (2005). What next for strategic-level leadership research? Leadership, 1(1), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. H. (2003). The authority of ideas. Harvard Business Review, 81(8), 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2003). Institutional diversity in UK higher education: Policy and outcomes since the end of the binary divide. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(3), 266–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. S., & Ramaswamy, K. (1996). Matching managers to strategy: Further tests of the miles and snow typology. British Journal of Management, 7, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (1996). University typologies re-examined. Higher Education Review, 29(1), 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twale, D. J. (1997). Women in the deanship: Quest for academic deanship. A Leadership Journal: Women in Leadership - Sharing Vision, 1(2), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • UUK. (2006). Universities UK and the universities and colleges employers’ association comment on Vice-Chancellors’ pay. Retrieved 13th December 2006, from http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/mediareleases/showpressnotice.asp?PR=3

  • Watson, D., & Bowden, R. (2001). Can we be equal and excellent too? The new labour stewardship of UK Higher Education, 1997–2001: Education Research Centre, University of Brighton, Occasional Paper.

  • Wolverton, M., & Poch, S. (2000). The nexus between academic deans and corporate CEOs: An opportunity in the making. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yielder, J., & Codling, A. (2004). Management and leadership in the contemporary university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(3), 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organisations (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  • Zaccaro, S., & Horn, Z. (2003). Leadership theory and practice: Fostering and effective symbiosis. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 769–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2004). When the known devil is better than an unknown god: An empirical study of the antecedents and consequences of relay CEO successions. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vice-Chancellors Office, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK

    Glynis M. Breakwell & Michelle Y. Tytherleigh

Authors
  1. Glynis M. Breakwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michelle Y. Tytherleigh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glynis M. Breakwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breakwell, G.M., Tytherleigh, M.Y. UK university leaders at the turn of the 21st century: changing patterns in their socio-demographic characteristics. High Educ 56, 109–127 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9092-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9092-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation