Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 321–332 | Cite as

Alienation and engagement: development of an alternative theoretical framework for understanding student learning

  • Jennifer M. CaseEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper it is suggested that the themes of alienation and engagement offer a productive alternative perspective for characterising the student experience of learning in higher education, compared to current dominant perspectives such as that offered by approaches to learning and related concepts. A conceptual and historical background of the concept of alienation is presented, followed by an overview of some contemporary perspectives. Drawing on this literature, a framework is then developed for characterising student learning. It comprises three categories, referring to the alienation resulting from 1. entering the higher education community, 2. fitting into the higher education community, and 3. staying in the higher education community. Each category has an associated set of theoretical tools that can be drawn upon in analysing this aspect of the student experience.

Keywords

Alienation Engagement Student learning Tertiary education Approaches to learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Important critical input towards the development of this paper has been received from my colleagues in the Centre for Research in Engineering Education (CREE). I would also like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa.

References

  1. Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). London: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). The purpose of reflexive sociology. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 94–109). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Case, J. M. (2004). A critical look at innovative practice from the student perspective. In C. Baillie & I. Moore (Eds.), Effective learning and teaching in engineering (pp. 139–155). Oxford: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  4. Case, J. M. (2007). Alienation and engagement: Exploring students’ experiences of studying engineering. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Case, J. M., & Gunstone, R. F. (2006). Metacognitive development: A view beyond cognition. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Man, A., & Devisse, T. (1987). Locus of control, mental ability, self-esteem and alienation. Social Behavior and Personality, 15(2), 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Entwistle, N. J. (1997). Reconstituting approaches to learning: A response to Webb. Higher Education, 33(2), 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gee, J. P. (2001). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. (Paper presented at the Science Literacy Connections Conference, Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar
  9. Geyer, F. (2001). Alienation, Sociology of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 388–392). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbs, G., Morgan, A., & Taylor, E. (1984). The world of the learner. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 165–188). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Haggis, T. (2003). Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into ‘approaches to learning’ research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hand, L., & Bryson, C. (2005). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. (Paper presented at the Staff and Education Development Association (SEDA) Spring Conference, Belfast.).Google Scholar
  13. Hodkinson, P. (2004). Career decision-making, learning careers and career progression (Nuffield Review of 14–19 Education and Training Working Paper 12.).Google Scholar
  14. Kember, D., Lee, K., & Li, N. (2001). Cultivating a sense of belonging in part-time students. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(4), 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loo, C. M., & Rolison, G. (1986). Alienation of ethnic minority students at a predominantly white university. Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malcolm, J., & Zukas, M. (2001). Bridging pedagogic gaps: Conceptual discontinuities in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mann, S. J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehra, N. (1973). Alienation: Meaning, origins and forms. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 19(2), 129–143.Google Scholar
  21. Newman, J. H. (1852/1964). The idea of a university. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  22. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Rendon, L., Jalomo, R., & Nora, A. (2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 127–156). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt.Google Scholar
  24. Rodney, C. A., & Mandzuk, D. (1994). The alienation of undergraduate education students: A case study of a Canadian university. Journal of Education for Teaching, 20(2), 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schabracq, M., & Cooper, C. (2003). To be me or not to be me: About alienation. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 16(2), 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24, 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seeman, M. (1983). Alienation motifs in contemporary theorizing: The hidden continuity of the classic themes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(3), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seeman, M. (2001). Alienation: Psychosociological tradition. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 385–388). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, D. G. (1991). The challenge of diversity: Alienation in the academy and its implications for faculty. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 2, 129–137.Google Scholar
  30. Suarez, S. A., Flowers, B. J., Garwood, C. S., & Szapocznik, J. (1997). Biculturalism, differentness, loneliness, and alienation in Hispanic college students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 19(4), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student departure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Webb, G. (1997). Deconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography. Higher Education, 33(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yan, L., & Kember, D. (2004). Avoider and engager approaches by out-of-class groups: The group equivalent to individual learning approaches. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations