Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Stratification of Students in Israeli Universities: Persistent Outcomes of an Educational Expansion Policy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expansion trends of higher education systems involve the planned growth of new universities, frequently stratified lower than established ones in academic breadth and excellence as well as in the socio-demographic origins of their students. The persistence of this internal stratification of the university system subsequent to its expansion remains a controversial issue. Between the early and mid-1990s the Israeli Council for Higher Education has expanded the three ‘‘target’’ universities, aimed at peripheral or specific sectors. Compared to the three established elitist institutions, these universities have concentrated on the liberal arts and attracted students of lower social origins. The present study examines the stratification of students into elitist and target universities a few years after this particular expansion policy was abandoned in favor of college accreditation. Though the overall growth rate of university freshmen since 1995 has subsequently declined, the relative share of the target universities is still steadily growing. Our analysis of data from a 1999 national survey of freshmen in all six universities reveals that students of the target universities still tend to originate from lower status groups and ethnic minorities regardless of academic ability. Furthermore, their general study motivations, particular study considerations, and institutional choice orientations are more practical and vocationally oriented than those of students in the elitist universities. It therefore seems that expansion policies of university systems should not overlook their long-term consequences for the stratification of universities and their students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayalon, H., & Yogev, A. (2000). A window to the academic dream: Stratification and diversity in the expansion of Israeli higher education. Paper presented at a conference of the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility of the International Sociological Association, Calgary.

  • Ayalon, H., & Yogev, A. (2002). A window to the academic dream: Social implications of higher education expansion in Israel. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education (Hebrew).

  • Ayalon, H., & Yogev, A. (2005). Field of study and student stratification in an expanded system of higher education: The case of Israel. European Sociological Review, 21, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. (2001). Academic development. In D. Warner & D. Palfreyman (Eds.), The state of UK higher education (pp. 178–185). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis in behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedegebuure, L., Meek, V. L., Kivinen, O., & Rinne, R. (1996). On diversity, differentiation and convergence. In V. L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen & R. Rinne (Eds.), The mockers and mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education (pp. 1–13). New York: Pergamon for the IAU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guri-Rosenblit, S. (1999). Changing boundaries in Israeli higher education. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 4, 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (2000). Higher education institutions: As different as chalk and cheese? Higher Education Policy, 13, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICBS (Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics). (1999). Candidates for first degree studies in universities 1998/1999. Jerusalem: Publication 25.

  • ICBS (Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics). (2000). Candidates for first degree studies in universities 1999/2000. Jerusalem: Publication 25.

  • ICHE (Israeli Council for Higher Education). (1991). The higher education system in Israel will expand. Bulletin 2 (September): 1. Jerusalem: Planning and Budgeting Committee (in Hebrew).

  • ICHE (Israeli Council for Higher Education). (2000). Annual report number 25, 1997–1998. Jerusalem: Planning and Budgeting Committee (in Hebrew).

  • Iram, Y. (1990). Central regulation versus institutional autonomy: Reforms in the Israeli higher education system. Higher Education Policy, 3, 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karen, D. (2002). Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980–1992. Sociology of Education, 75, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazin, O. (1997). A voice in the desert. Haaretz, October 1 (in Hebrew).

  • Levtzion, N. (1998). The next century. Academia, 4, 7–11 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lori, A. (1995). We were left behind. Haaretz Weekly Supplement, June 16, 33–36 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltz, N. M. (2001). Academic colleges: Transforming higher education in Israel. Higher Education Policy, 14, 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, Y. (1984). Tracking and ethnicity in Israeli secondary education. American Sociological Review, 49, 210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, Y., Bolotin-Chachashvili, S., Ayalon, H., & Menachem, G. (2002). Diversification, expansion and inequality in Israeli higher education. Paper presented at a conference of the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility of the International Sociological Association, Oxford.

  • Smith, D. (1999). The changing idea of a university. In D. Smith & A. K. Langslow (Eds.), The idea of a university (pp. 106–123). London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (1988). Changing patterns of the higher education system: The experience of three decades. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Välimaa, J. (1999). Managing a diverse system of higher education. In M. Henkel & B. Little (Eds.), Changing relationships between higher education and the state (pp. 23–41). London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, D., & Palfreyman, D. (Eds.) (2001). The state of UK higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

  • Yogev, A. (1997). Autonomy and choice as school strategies for peripheral communities in Israel. In R. Shapira & P. W. Cookson (Eds.), Autonomy and choice in context: An international perspective (pp. 172–202). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yogev, A. (2000). The stratification of Israeli universities: Implications for higher education policy. Higher Education, 40, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I thank Hanna Ayalon, Moshe Lavie, Yossi Shavit and Sima Yogev for their helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abraham Yogev.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 1999 University application by field of first and second choice and by university typea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yogev, A. The Stratification of Students in Israeli Universities: Persistent Outcomes of an Educational Expansion Policy. High Educ 54, 629–645 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9013-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9013-9

Keywords

Navigation