Skip to main content
Log in

Orientations to research higher degree supervision

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the beliefs of supervisors and PhD candidates about higher degree supervision and three other academic domains: research; teaching; and learning. Interview data from 34 participants were categorised into four distinctive orientations to supervision, each consisting of a network (plexus) of beliefs about the four domains. Although each orientation comprised many beliefs, the orientations clearly differed in terms of two broad distinctions: whether the supervisor should direct and take responsibility for the research (controlling beliefs) or should guide the process (guiding beliefs), and whether the focus of supervision should be more upon the research tasks to be completed (task-focussed beliefs) or upon the development of the candidates (person-focussed beliefs). These distinctions, plus the types of interconnections between the beliefs comprising each orientation, support the conclusion that beliefs about teaching are central to each orientation, even though supervision is intimately concerned with research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, J. (2001). The 1999 Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire. Australian Council for Educational Research, Evaluations and Investigations Programme, Higher Education Division, DETYA: Commonwealth of Australia. Accessed May 2002. http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/eippubs.htm#01_4.

  • L. Andresen (1999) ‘Supervision revisited: Thoughts on scholarship, pedagogy and postgraduate research’ G. Wisker N. Sutcliffe (Eds) Good Practice in Postgraduate Supervision. SEDA Paper 106 Staff and Educational Development Birmingham 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Aspland H. Edwards J. O’Leary (1999) ArticleTitle‘Tracking new directions in the evaluation of postgraduate supervision’ Innovative Higher Education 24 IssueID2 127–147 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:IHIE.0000008150.75564.b3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Bain C. McNaught C. Mills G. Lueckenhausen (1998) ArticleTitle‘Describing computer facilitated learning environments in higher education’ Learning Environments Research 1 163–180 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009905832421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Bair J.G. Haworth (2004) ‘Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research’ J. C. Smart (Eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research NumberInSeries19 Kluwer Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Becher P. Trowler (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories EditionNumber2 The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press Buckingham, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Becher M. Henkel M. Kogan (1994) Graduate Education in Britain, Higher Education Policy Series 17 Jessica Kingsley London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. (2000). The Development of Students’ Experiences of Learning in Higher Education. Doctoral thesis, Griffith University, Queensland

  • A. Brew (1999) ArticleTitle‘Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context’ Studies in Higher Education 24 IssueID3 291–301 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075079912331379905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Brockbank I. McGill (1998) Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education SRHE and OUP Guildford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Brown M. Atkins (1988) Effective Teaching in Higher Education Methuen London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns R., Lamm, R. and Lewis, R. (1999). ‘Orientations to higher degree supervision: A study of supervisors and students in education’, in Holbrook, A. and Johnston, S. (eds.), Supervision of Postgraduate Research in Education. Australian Association for Research in Education, No. 5. Victoria, Australia: AARE, pp. 55–74

  • J. Calderhead (1996) ‘Teachers: beliefs and knowledge’ D.C. Berliner (Eds) Handbook of Educational Psychology Macmillan New York 709–725

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Connell (1985) ArticleTitle‘How to supervise a PhD’ Vestes 2 38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Conrad (1996) ‘A framework for evaluation of postgraduate supervision and support’ O. Zuber-Skerritt (Eds) Frameworks for Postgraduate Education Southern Cross University Press Lismore, NSW 48–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, L. and Chipperfield, J. (2004). ‘Research Higher Degree Students’ Perceptions of their Learning’, paper presented at the Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference, Adelaide, 21–23 April

  • Cullen, D.J., Pearson, M., Saha, L.J. and Spear, R.H. (1994). Establishing Effective PhD Supervision. Commonwealth of Australia: Higher Education Division, Evaluations and Investigations Program, ANU

  • S. Delamont P. Atkinson P. Parry (1997) ArticleTitle‘Critical mass and doctoral research: Reflections on the Harris Report’ Studies in Higher Education 22 IssueID3 319–331 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075079712331380926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Exley C. O’Malley (1999) ‘Supervising PhDs in science and engineering’ G. Wisker N. Sutcliffe (Eds) Good Practice in Postgraduate Supervision. SEDA Paper 106 Staff and Educational Development Birmingham 39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fox (1983) ArticleTitle‘Personal theories of teaching’ Studies in Higher Education 8 IssueID2 151–163 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075078312331379014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Gow D. Kember (1993) ArticleTitle‘Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to learning’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 63 20–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. and Lee, A. (1995/1998). ‘Theorising postgraduate pedagogy’, in Lee, A. and Green, B. (eds.), Postgraduate Studies, Postgraduate Pedagogy. Centre for Language and Literacy, Faculty of Education, UTS and University Graduate School, University of Technology, Sydney, pp. 129–146

  • B. Green A. Lee (1999) ‘Educational research, disciplinarity and postgraduate pedagogy: On the subject of supervision’ A. Holbrook S. Johnston (Eds) Supervision of Postgraduate Research in Education AARE Victoria, Australia 207–223

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Hativa (2002) ‘Becoming a better teacher: A case of changing the pedagogical knowledge of law professors’ N. Hativa P. Goodyear (Eds) Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education Kluwer Academic Dordrecht, Netherlands 289–319

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hockey (1996) ArticleTitle‘A contractual solution to problems in the supervision of PhD degrees in the UK’ Studies in Higher Education 21 IssueID3 359–371 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075079612331381271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Holdaway (1997a) ‘Quality issues in postgraduate education’ R. Burgess (Eds) Beyond the First Degree: Graduate Education, Lifelong Learning and Careers Society for Research into Higher Education and OPU Buckingham 61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, E. (1997b). How Does the Australian PhD Stack up Against the North American PhD? Address given at Graduate School Forum, Australian National University, Canberra, 14 May

  • E.A. Holdaway C. Deblois I.S. Winchester (1994) ArticleTitle‘Practices and opinions reported by coordinators of graduate programs’ Interchange 25 IssueID1 65–86 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01447194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Horschette (1994) Career Advancement and Survival for Engineers John Wiley and Sons, Wiley-Interscience New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Irby (1994) ArticleTitle‘What clinical teachers in medicine need to know’ Academic Medicine 69 IssueID5 333–342 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00001888-199405000-00003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Johnson A. Lee B. Green (2000) ArticleTitle‘The PhD and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy’ Studies in Higher Education 25 IssueID2 136–147

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Kane S. Sandretto C. Heath (2002) ArticleTitle‘Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics’ Review of Educational Research 72 IssueID2 177–228

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kember (2001) ArticleTitle‘Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education’ Studies in Higher Education 26 IssueID2 205–221 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075070120052116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Kember L. Gow (1994) ArticleTitle‘Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning’ Journal of Higher Education 65 IssueID1 58–74 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2943877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D.A. (2002). Higher Education Report for the 2002–2004 Triennium. DEST. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training. Accessed September 2003. http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/he_report/2002_2004/html/contents.htm.

  • M. Knowles (1990) The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species EditionNumber4 Houston Gulf

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kvale (1996) Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Latona, K. and Browne, M. (2001). ‘Factors associated with successful completion of research higher degrees’, Higher Education Series Report No. 37, May. Canberra: DETYA Higher Education Division, Communications Unit

  • Lee, A. and Green, B. (eds.). (1998). ‘Introduction’, in Lee, A. and Green, B. (eds.), Postgraduate Studies, Postgraduate Pedagogy. Centre for Language and Literacy, Faculty of Education, UTS and University Graduate School, University of Technology, Sydney, pp. 1–8

  • Love, A. and Street, A. (1998). ‘Supervision as collaborative problem-solving: An integrative approach to postgraduate research education’, in Kiley, M. and Mullins, G. (eds.), Quality in Postgraduate Research: Managing the New Agenda. Proceedings of the 1998 Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference. Adelaide, pp. 149–159

  • Macauley, P. (2001). Doctoral Research and Scholarly Communication: Candidates, Supervisors and Information Literacy. Doctoral thesis, Faculty of Education, Deakin University, South Australia

  • McWilliam, E. (ed.). (2002). Doctoral education in a knowledge economy [Special issue]. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(2)

  • Martin, Y.M., Maclachlan, M. and Karmel, T. (2001). Postgraduate Completion Rates. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), 2001D, Occasional Paper Series, Higher Education Division, Commonwealth of Australia. Accessed April, 2002. http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/occpaper.htm#00g.

  • R. Neumann (1992) ArticleTitle‘Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis’ Higher Education 23 159–171 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00143643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (2003). The Doctoral Education Experience: Diversity and Complexity. DEST, Evaluations and Investigations Programme. Accessed September 2003. http://www.detya.gov.au/highered/eippubs/eip03_12/default.htm.

  • J. Nespor (1987) ArticleTitle‘The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching’ Journal of Curriculum Studies 19 IssueID4 317–328

    Google Scholar 

  • M.F. Pajares (1992) ArticleTitle‘Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct Review of Educational Research 62 IssueID3 307–332 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1170741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Parry M. Hayden (1994) Supervising Higher Degree Research Students DEET Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, H. (2002). Implementing the Research Training Scheme: The consequences for postgraduate research students. CAPA Research Paper, November 2003: Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations. Accessed October 2003. http://www.capa.edu.au/frameset.html?./papers/index.html.

  • M. Pearson (1996) ArticleTitle‘Professionalising PhD education to enhance the quality of the student experience’ Higher Education 32 303–320 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00138869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Pearson (1999) ArticleTitle‘The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: Implications for quality management, improvement and innovation’ Higher Education Research and Development 18 IssueID3 269–286

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Pearson A. Brew (2002) ArticleTitle‘Research training and supervision development’ Studies in Higher Education 27 IssueID2 135–150 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075070220119986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Phillips D.H. Pugh (1994) How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors EditionNumber2 OUP Buckingham, England

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Pole A. Sprokkereef R. Burgess E. Lakin (1997) ArticleTitle‘Supervision of doctoral students in the natural sciences: Expectations and experiences’ Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 22 IssueID1 49–63

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Prosser K. Trigwell (1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education SHRE and OUP Buckingham, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, K. (1997). ‘Case studies of academics’ educational beliefs about their discipline: Toward a discourse on scholarly dimensions of teaching’, Proceedings, HERSDA International Conference, Adelaide, pp. 620–625

  • K. Quinlan (1999) ArticleTitle‘Commonalities and controversy in context: A study of academic historians’ educational beliefs’ Teaching and Teacher Education 15 447–463 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00066-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Quinlan (2002) ArticleTitle‘Scholarly dimensions of academics’ beliefs about engineering education’ Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice 8 IssueID1 41–64 Occurrence Handle10.1080/13540600120110565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., Ginns, P. and Conrad, L. (2004). ‘Associations between research students’ experiences and learning outcomes’. 12th Improving Student Learning Symposium, Birmingham, UK, 6–8 September

  • Samuelowicz, K. (1999). Academics’ Educational Beliefs and Teaching Practices. Doctoral dissertation. Griffith University, Queensland

  • K. Samuelowicz J.D. Bain (1992) ArticleTitle‘Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers’ Higher Education 24 92–111 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00138620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Samuelowicz J.D. Bain (2001) ArticleTitle‘Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning’ Higher Education 41 299–325 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004130031247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Samuelowicz J.D. Bain (2002) ArticleTitle‘Identifying academics’ orientations to assessment practice’ Higher Education 43 173–201 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013796916022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.G. Shannon (1998) ‘Research degree supervision: “More mentor than master”’ A. Lee B. Green (Eds) Postgraduate Studies, Postgraduate Pedagogy UTS, Faculty of Education, Centre for Language and Literacy and University Graduate School Sydney 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Smeby (2000) ArticleTitle‘Disciplinary differences in Norwegian graduate education’ Studies in Higher Education 25 IssueID1 53–67 Occurrence Handle10.1080/030750700116019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Smith (2001) ‘(Re)framing research degree supervision as pedagogy’ A. Bartlett G. Mercer (Eds) Postgraduate Research Supervision: Transforming (R)elations Peter Lang New York 25–41

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Strauss J. Corbin (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory EditionNumber2 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Driel Particlevan N. Verloop H. Werven Particlevan H. Dekkers (1997) ArticleTitle‘Teachers’ craft knowledge and curriculum innovation in higher engineering education’ Higher Education 34 IssueID1 105–122 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003063317210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Whittle (1992) ‘Research culture, supervision practices’ O. Zuber-Skerritt (Eds) Starting Research – Supervision and Training Tertiary Education Institute, University of Queensland Brisbane 86–107

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Wisker (1999) ‘Introduction: Changes in postgraduates, changes in good practice in supervision and instructional support’ G. Wisker N. Sutcliffe (Eds) Good Practice in Postgraduate Supervision SEDA Paper 106 Staff and Educational Development Birmingham 5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisker, G. (2000). ‘Postgraduate learning styles and enabling practices: A multicultural action research study’, in Kiley, M. and Mullins, G. (eds.). Making Ends Meet. Proceedings of the 2nd Postgraduate Experience Conference, Adelaide

  • O. Zuber-Skerritt (Eds) (1992) Starting Research – Supervision and Training Tertiary Education Institute, University of Queensland Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Zuber-Skerritt Y. Ryan (Eds) (1994) Quality in Postgraduate Education Kogan Page London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noela Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, N., Bain, J.D. & Conrad, L. Orientations to research higher degree supervision. High Educ 53, 209–234 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9

Keywords

Navigation