Abstract
Multiple questionnaires completed over the semester by 514 students enrolled in a first year psychology course reveal that no single pattern of reliance on print, online, or in-person resources guarantees a high mark. Analyses of the reported and measured frequency of use of various resources correlated against students’, performance on both individual assessments and their final marks suggests that students employ a range of strategies in their use of class resources. They tend to rely on their textbooks, Web-based lecture notes, and online quizzes, but their final marks are more strongly determined by their university entrance scores than by their resource use strategy, their sex, or whether or not English is their first language. The data suggest that students adapt their learning strategies to the resources available, with an apparent emphasis on learning what will be assessed rather than exploring for understanding. Importantly, the results argue that investment in development of educational technologies – and students’, use of educational technologies – must be informed by empirical data concerning its impact on the efficiency and quality of learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.A. Baron (2001) Psychology EditionNumber5 Allyn & Bacon NY
J.B. Biggs (1996) ArticleTitleEnhancing teaching through constructive alignment Higher Education 32 347–364 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00138871
S. Bonham D.L. Deardorff R.J. Beichner (2003) ArticleTitleComparison of student performance using Web and paper-based homework in college-level physics Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 1050–1071 Occurrence Handle10.1002/tea.10120
H. Chumley-Jones A. Dobbie C. Alford (2002) ArticleTitleWeb-based learning: sound educational method or hype Academic Medicine 77 86–93 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00001888-200210001-00028
R.E. Clark (1985) ArticleTitleEvidence for confounding in computer-based instruction studies: analysing the meta analyses Educational Communication and Technology Journal 33 249–262
R.E. Clark (1983) ArticleTitleReconsidering research on learning from media Review of Educational Research 53 445–459 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1170217
S. Kekkonen-Moneta G. Moneta (2002) ArticleTitleE-learning in Hong Kong: comparing learning outcomes in online multimedia and lecture versions of an introductory computing course British Journal of Educational Technology 33 423–433 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8535.00279
D. Laurillard (1993) Rethinking University Teaching Routledge London
D. Laurillard G. Joughlin P. Taylor (1999) Evaluating Flexible Learning Griffith, Institute for Higher Education Griffith Australia
P. Lawther D. Walker (2001) ArticleTitleAn evaluation of a distributed learning system Education and Training 43 105–116 Occurrence Handle10.1108/EUM0000000005426
L. Lockyer J. Patterson B. Harper (2001) ArticleTitleICT outcomes in higher education: evaluating outcomes for health education Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 275–283 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00182.x
L.S. Norton (1981) ArticleTitleThe effects of notetaking and use on long-term recall Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 18 16–22
L.S. Norton J. Hartley (1986) ArticleTitleWhat factors contribute to good examination marks? The role of notetaking in subsequent examination performance Higher Education 15 355–371 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00129223
P.A. Nye T.J. Crooks M. Powley G. Tripp (1984) ArticleTitleStudent notetaking related to university examination performance Higher Education 13 85–97 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00136532
T. Piemme (1988) ArticleTitleComputer-assisted learning and evaluation in medicine JAMA 260 367–372 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.260.3.367
D. Richardson (1997) ArticleTitleStudent perceptions and learning outcomes of computer-assisted versus traditional instruction in physiology Advances in Physiology Education 18 55–58
InstitutionalAuthorNameSPSS (2002) SPSS for Windows Rel. 11.5.1 SPSS Inc Chicago
S. Tobias J. Raphael (1996) ArticleTitleIn-class examinations in college-level science: new theory, new practice Journal of Science Education and Technology 5 4–9
S. Tobias (1990) They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier Research Corporation Tucson
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huon, G., Spehar, B., Adam, P. et al. Resource use and academic performance among first year psychology students. High Educ 53, 1–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-1727-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-1727-6