Signs of Erosion: Reflections on Three Decades of Problem-based Learning at Maastricht University

Abstract

Nowadays many schools in higher education implement problem-based learning to foster active learning processes by students. In some schools with a number of years of experience with this approach, phenomena can be observed which indicate signs of wear. The implementation of a large-scale innovation such as problem-based learning (PBL) seems to provoke different activities and attitudes in those actors who are most involved. Students and staff members seem to behave in a way which could be counterproductive to the development of self-directed learning. In the first part of this paper, we briefly describe the cognitive psychological background of PBL. In the second part various adjustments observed in problem-based curricula and their effects on students’ learning are analyzed. Arguments are presented about adverse effects on the implementation of this educational innovation. Special attention is given to teachers’ concerns. In the third part suggestions are made about ways to revitalize PBL processes as well as suggestions about effecting educational innovations on a more solid basis

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. J.A.R. Arts W.H. Gijselaers S.R. Segers (2002) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive effects of an authentic computer-supported, problem-based learning environment’ Instructional Science 30 465–495 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1020532128625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrows, H.S. (2001). www.pbli.org.

  3. H.S. Barrows R.M. Tamblyn (1980) Problem-based Learning, An Approach to Medical Education Springer New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.D. Bransford A.L. Brown R.R. Cocking (1999) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School National Academy Press Washington

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.A. Dahlgren L.O. Dahlgren (2002) ArticleTitle‘Portraits of PBL: Students’ experiences of the characteristics of problem-based learning in physiotherapy, computer engineering and psychology’ Instructional Science 30 111–127 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014819418051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W.S. Grave ParticleDe H.P.A. Boshuizen H.G. Schmidt (1996) ArticleTitle‘Problem-based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis’ Instructional Science 24 321–341 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00118111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Dolmans M. Hurkvan Particleden I. Wolfhagen C. Vleutenvan Particleder (1996) ArticleTitle‘Limiting tutorial-group size’ Academic Medicine 71 4a

    Google Scholar 

  8. Driessen E.W., Vleuten van der C.P.M. (2002). ‘Universiteit Maastricht: Portfolio’s voor eerstejaars studenten geneeskunde’ (Maastricht University: Portfolios for first year medical students). In: Driessen E., Beijaard D., Tartwijk J. van and Vleuten C., van der (eds). Portfolio’s. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, pp. 37–47

  9. N. Frederiksen (1984) ArticleTitle‘The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning’ American Psychologist 39 193–202 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0003-066X.39.3.193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Hoffman D. Ritchie (1997) ArticleTitle‘Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem-based learning’ Instructional Science 25 97–115 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1002967414942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M.E. Gredler (1999) Classroom Assessment and Learning Longman New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.A. Leithwood D. Tomlinson M. Genge (1996) ‘Transformational school leadership’ K. Leithwood J. Chapman D. Corson Ph. Hallinger A Hart (Eds) International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 785–840

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Lejk M. Wyvill S. Farrow (1996) ArticleTitle‘A survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessments’ Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education 21 267–280

    Google Scholar 

  14. B.M. Miflin C.B. Campbell D.A. Price (2000) ArticleTitle‘A conceptual framework to guide the development of self-directed, lifelong learning in problem-based medical curricula’ Medical Education 34 299–306 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00564.x Occurrence Handle10733727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Moust H. Roebertsen H. Dahlmans A. Rijk Particlede H. Savelberg (2003) ArticleTitle‘Probleemgestuurd onderwijs met studieteams’ (Problem-based learning with studyteams) Onderzoek van Onderwijs 32 8–12

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.H.C. Moust (1993) De rol van tutoren in probleemgestuurd onderwijs Contrasten tussen student- en docent-tutoren (The Role of the Tutor in Problem-based Learning Contrasts Between Student and Staff Tutors) Maastricht University Datawyse

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.H.C. Moust P.A.J. Bouhuijs H.G. Schmidt (2001) Problem-based Learning: A Student Guide Wolters-Noordhoff Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.C. Myers Kelson (2000) ‘Epilogue: Assessment of students for proactive lifelong learning’ D.H. Evensen C.E Hmelo (Eds) Problem-based Learning. A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah 315–345

    Google Scholar 

  19. G.T. Norman H.G. Schmidt (1992) ArticleTitle‘The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence’ Academic Medicine 67 557–565 Occurrence Handle1520409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. H.G. Schmidt (1983) ArticleTitle‘Problem-based learning: Rationale and description’ Medical Education 17 11–16 Occurrence Handle6823214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt, H.G. (1999). ‘Testing a causal model of problem-based learning’, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, CA, April 19–23

  22. Schmidt, H.G. and Gijselaers, W.H. (1990). ‘Causal modeling of problem-based learning’, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA, April 16–22.

  23. H.G. Schmidt J.H.C. Moust (2000) ‘Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research’ D.H. Evensen C.E Hmelo (Eds) Problem-based Learning A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions. Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.G. Schmidt A. Arend ParticleVan der I. Kokx L. Boon (1993) ArticleTitle‘Influence of tutors’ subject-matter expertise on student effort and achievement in problem-based learning’ Academic Medicine 68 748–791 Occurrence Handle8397599

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Senge N. Cambron-McCabe T. Lucas B. Smith J. Dutton A. Kleiner (2000) Schools that Learn. A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone Who Cares About Education Doubleday New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. N.S. Shapiro J.H. Levine (1999) Creating Learning Communities: A Practical Guide to Winning Support, Organizing for Changen, and Implementing Programs Jossey Bass San Fransico (Cal)

    Google Scholar 

  27. H.J.M. Berkel ParticleVan H.G. Schmidt (2000) ArticleTitle‘Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning’ Higher Education 40 231–242 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004022116365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Berkel, H.J.M. and Til, van C.T. (1998). ‘Group performing in a problem-based curriculum: The development and evaluation of an instrument’, Presented at the AERA Conference in San Diego CA, April 1998 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. TM031271).

  29. Berg ParticleVan den (1993) ArticleTitle‘The concerns-based adoption model in the Netherlands, Flanders and the United Kingdom: State of the art and perspective’ Studies in Educational Evaluation 19 201–223

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. Berg ParticleVan den A. Ros (1999) ArticleTitle‘The permanent importance of the subjective reality of teachers during educational innovation: A concerns-based approach’ American Educational Research Journal 36 879–906

    Google Scholar 

  31. Van den Berg R., Vandenberghe R. (eds). (1995). ‘Wegen van Betrokkenheid: Reflecties op onderwijsvernieuwing’ [Ways of being Concerned: Reflections on Educational Innovation]. Tilburg, the Netherlands: Zwijsen.

  32. Van der Hurk, M. and Van Berkel, H.J.M. (2002). ‘Effects of student employment on study-behavior and achievement in a problem-based curriculum’, Presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 1–5, New Orleans, LA, U.S.A.

  33. J.D. Vermunt L. Verschaffel (2000) ‘Process-oriented teaching’ R.J. Simons J. Linden Particlevan der T Duffy (Eds) New Learning. Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston 209–227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. H. C. Moust.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moust, J.H.C., Berkel, H.J.M.V. & Schmidt, H.G. Signs of Erosion: Reflections on Three Decades of Problem-based Learning at Maastricht University. High Educ 50, 665–683 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6371-z

Download citation

Key words

  • concerns-based adoption model
  • implementation
  • learning principles
  • problem-based learning
  • transformative leadership