Higher Education

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 665–683 | Cite as

Signs of Erosion: Reflections on Three Decades of Problem-based Learning at Maastricht University

  • J. H. C. Moust
  • H. J. M. Van. Berkel
  • H. G. Schmidt


Nowadays many schools in higher education implement problem-based learning to foster active learning processes by students. In some schools with a number of years of experience with this approach, phenomena can be observed which indicate signs of wear. The implementation of a large-scale innovation such as problem-based learning (PBL) seems to provoke different activities and attitudes in those actors who are most involved. Students and staff members seem to behave in a way which could be counterproductive to the development of self-directed learning. In the first part of this paper, we briefly describe the cognitive psychological background of PBL. In the second part various adjustments observed in problem-based curricula and their effects on students’ learning are analyzed. Arguments are presented about adverse effects on the implementation of this educational innovation. Special attention is given to teachers’ concerns. In the third part suggestions are made about ways to revitalize PBL processes as well as suggestions about effecting educational innovations on a more solid basis

Key words

concerns-based adoption model implementation learning principles problem-based learning transformative leadership 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arts, J.A.R., Gijselaers, W.H., Segers, S.R. 2002‘Cognitive effects of an authentic computer-supported, problem-based learning environment’Instructional Science30465495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrows, H.S. (2001). Scholar
  3. Barrows, H.S., Tamblyn, R.M. 1980Problem-based Learning, An Approach to Medical EducationSpringerNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R. 1999How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and SchoolNational Academy PressWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahlgren, M.A., Dahlgren, L.O. 2002‘Portraits of PBL: Students’ experiences of the characteristics of problem-based learning in physiotherapy, computer engineering and psychology’Instructional Science30111127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grave, W.S., Boshuizen, H.P.A., Schmidt, H.G. 1996‘Problem-based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis’Instructional Science24321341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolmans, D., Hurkvan, M., Wolfhagen, I., Vleutenvan, C. 1996‘Limiting tutorial-group size’Academic Medicine714aGoogle Scholar
  8. Driessen E.W., Vleuten van der C.P.M. (2002). ‘Universiteit Maastricht: Portfolio’s voor eerstejaars studenten geneeskunde’ (Maastricht University: Portfolios for first year medical students). In: Driessen E., Beijaard D., Tartwijk J. van and Vleuten C., van der (eds). Portfolio’s. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, pp. 37–47Google Scholar
  9. Frederiksen, N. 1984‘The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning’American Psychologist39193202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffman, B., Ritchie, D. 1997‘Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem-based learning’Instructional Science2597115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gredler, M.E. 1999Classroom Assessment and LearningLongmanNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Leithwood, K.A., Tomlinson, D., Genge, M. 1996‘Transformational school leadership’Leithwood, K.Chapman, J.Corson, D.Hallinger, Ph.Hart, A eds. International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration.Kluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht785840Google Scholar
  13. Lejk, M., Wyvill, M., Farrow, S. 1996‘A survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessments’Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education21267280Google Scholar
  14. Miflin, B.M., Campbell, C.B., Price, D.A. 2000‘A conceptual framework to guide the development of self-directed, lifelong learning in problem-based medical curricula’Medical Education34299306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Moust, J., Roebertsen, H., Dahlmans, H., Rijk, A., Savelberg, H. 2003‘Probleemgestuurd onderwijs met studieteams’ (Problem-based learning with studyteams)Onderzoek van Onderwijs32812Google Scholar
  16. Moust, J.H.C. 1993De rol van tutoren in probleemgestuurd onderwijs Contrasten tussen student- en docent-tutoren (The Role of the Tutor in Problem-based Learning Contrasts Between Student and Staff Tutors)Maastricht UniversityDatawysePhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  17. Moust, J.H.C., Bouhuijs, P.A.J., Schmidt, H.G. 2001Problem-based Learning: A Student GuideWolters-NoordhoffGroningenGoogle Scholar
  18. Myers Kelson, A.C. 2000‘Epilogue: Assessment of students for proactive lifelong learning’Evensen, D.H.Hmelo, C.E eds. Problem-based Learning. A Research Perspective on Learning InteractionsLawrence ErlbaumMahwah315345Google Scholar
  19. Norman, G.T., Schmidt, H.G. 1992‘The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence’Academic Medicine67557565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt, H.G. 1983‘Problem-based learning: Rationale and description’Medical Education171116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmidt, H.G. (1999). ‘Testing a causal model of problem-based learning’, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, CA, April 19–23Google Scholar
  22. Schmidt, H.G. and Gijselaers, W.H. (1990). ‘Causal modeling of problem-based learning’, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA, April 16–22.Google Scholar
  23. Schmidt, H.G., Moust, J.H.C. 2000‘Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research’Evensen, D.H.Hmelo, C.E eds. Problem-based Learning A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions.Lawrence ErlbaumMahwah116Google Scholar
  24. Schmidt, H.G., Arend, A., Kokx, I., Boon, L. 1993‘Influence of tutors’ subject-matter expertise on student effort and achievement in problem-based learning’Academic Medicine68748791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., Kleiner, A. 2000Schools that Learn. A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone Who Cares About EducationDoubledayNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Shapiro, N.S., Levine, J.H. 1999Creating Learning Communities: A Practical Guide to Winning Support, Organizing for Changen, and Implementing ProgramsJossey BassSan Fransico (Cal)Google Scholar
  27. Berkel, H.J.M., Schmidt, H.G. 2000‘Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning’Higher Education40231242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Berkel, H.J.M. and Til, van C.T. (1998). ‘Group performing in a problem-based curriculum: The development and evaluation of an instrument’, Presented at the AERA Conference in San Diego CA, April 1998 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. TM031271).Google Scholar
  29. Berg,  1993‘The concerns-based adoption model in the Netherlands, Flanders and the United Kingdom: State of the art and perspective’Studies in Educational Evaluation19201223Google Scholar
  30. Berg, R., Ros, A. 1999‘The permanent importance of the subjective reality of teachers during educational innovation: A concerns-based approach’American Educational Research Journal36879906Google Scholar
  31. Van den Berg R., Vandenberghe R. (eds). (1995). ‘Wegen van Betrokkenheid: Reflecties op onderwijsvernieuwing’ [Ways of being Concerned: Reflections on Educational Innovation]. Tilburg, the Netherlands: Zwijsen.Google Scholar
  32. Van der Hurk, M. and Van Berkel, H.J.M. (2002). ‘Effects of student employment on study-behavior and achievement in a problem-based curriculum’, Presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 1–5, New Orleans, LA, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  33. Vermunt, J.D., Verschaffel, L. 2000‘Process-oriented teaching’Simons, R.J.Linden, J.Duffy, T eds. New Learning.Kluwer Academic PublishersBoston209227Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. C. Moust
    • 1
  • H. J. M. Van. Berkel
    • 1
  • H. G. Schmidt
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational Development and ResearchMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations