Abstract
This paper reports findings from a study of undergraduates’ expectations about, and experiences of, networked learning using computer-mediated conferencing (CMC). The data come from questionnaires administered at the start and end of four different courses, and their interpretation is informed by a set of interviews with students and teachers involved in these and other networked learning courses. Students’ views were generally positive at the start and at the end of each course, though they became more moderate over time. The structure of students’ reported feelings remained relatively stable over time. There was no evidence to suggest that male or younger students had more positive feelings about networked learning. The thoroughness with which CMC is integrated into a networked learning course appears as a significant factor in explaining differences in students’ feelings about the worth and value of their experience. As might be expected, a well-integrated course was associated with more positive experiences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Banks P. Goodyear V. Hodgson D. McConnell (Eds) (2002) Networked Learning 2002: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Networked Learning Sheffield University Sheffield
C. Bonk K. King (Eds) (1998) Electronic Collaborators: Learner Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship and Discourse Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, New Jersey
S. Booth M Hulten (2003) ArticleTitle‘Opening dimensions of variation: An empirical study of learning in a web-based discussion’ Instructional Science 31 IssueID1/2 65–86 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022552301050
M. Coomey J. Stephenson (2001) ‘Online learning: It’s all about dialogue, involvement, support and control according to research’ J. Stephenson (Eds) Teaching and Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies Kogan Page London 37–52
M. Laat ParticleDe V. Lally (2003) ArticleTitle‘Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community’ Instructional Science 31 IssueID1/2 7–39 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022596100142
N. Entwistle H. Tait McCune (2000) ArticleTitle‘Patterns of response to an approaches to study inventory across contrasting groups and contexts’ European Journal of the Psychology of Education 15 33–48
P. Goodyear (1996) ArticleTitle‘Asynchronous peer interaction in distance education: The evolution of goals, practices and technology’ Training Research Journal 1 71–102
P. Goodyear C Jones M. Asensio V. Hodgson C. Steeples (2001) Students’ Experiences of Networked Learning in Higher Education, Final Project Report (2 vols.) Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) Bristol
J. Hartley A. Tagg B. Garber D. Barry M. Fitter (1991) Computer Conferencing for Distance Learning: Final Report to the Learning Technologies Unit of the Department of Employment Birkbeck College, University of London London
N. Hara C.J. Bonk C. Angeli (2000) ArticleTitle‘Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course’ Instructional Science 28 IssueID2 115–152 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003764722829
R. Hazemi S. Hailes S. Wilbur (Eds) (1998) The Digital University: Reinventing the Academy Springer Verlag New York
F. Henri (1992) ‘Computer conferencing and content analysis’ A. Kaye (Eds) Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers Springer-Verlag Berlin 115–136
V. Hodgson D. McConnell (1992) ArticleTitle‘IT based open learning: A case study in Management learning’ Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 8 136–150
C. Howell-Richardson H. Mellar (1996) ArticleTitle‘A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer-mediated communication courses’ Instructional Science 24 47–69 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00156003
C. Jones (1998) Context, Content and Cooperation: An Ethnographic Study of Collaborative Learning online Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester
Jones, C. (2000). Understanding Students’ Experiences of Collaborative Networked Learning. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference, Lancaster University.
C. Jones S. Bloxham (2001) ArticleTitle‘Networked legal learning: An evaluation of the student experience’ International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 3 IssueID15 317–329
C. Jones M. Asensio (2001) ArticleTitle‘Experiences of assessment: Using phenomenography for evaluation’ Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 IssueID3 314–321 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00186.x
C. Jones M. Asensio P. Goodyear (2000) ArticleTitle‘Networked learning in higher education: Practitioners’ perspectives’ Journal of the Association for Learning Technology 8 IssueID2 18–28
Jones, C. and Cawood, J. (1998). The Unreliable Transcript: Contingent Technology and Informal Practice in Asynchronous Learning Networks. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference, Sheffield University.
A. Kaye (Eds) (1992) Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers Springer Verlag Berlin
C. Kramarae H. Taylor (1993) ‘Women and men on electronic networks: A conversation or a monologue?’ H. Taylor C. Kramarae M. Ebben (Eds) Women, Information Technology and Scholarship. University of Illinois Center for Advanced Study Illinois
P. Light V. Light (1999) ‘Analysing asynchronous learning interactions: Computer-mediated communication in a conventional undergraduate setting’ K. Littleton P. Light (Eds) Learning with Computers: Analysing Productive Interaction Routledge London 162–178
V. Light E. Nesbitt P. Light J. Burns (2000) ArticleTitle‘Let’s You and Me Have a Little Discussion’: Computer mediated communication in support of campus-based university courses’ Studies in Higher Education 25 IssueID1 85–96 Occurrence Handle10.1080/030750700116037
R. Mason A. Kaye (Eds) (1989) Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education Pergamon Oxford
D. McConnell (2000) Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning EditionNumber2 Kogan Page London
D. Mowrer (1996) ArticleTitle‘A content analysis of student/instructor communication via computer conferencing’ Higher Education 32 IssueID2 217–41 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00138397
J. Richardson (2000) Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus-based and Distance Education SRHE/Open University Press Buckingham
C. Steeples R. Johnson P. Goodyear (1992) ‘The rationale and design of the MSc information technology and learning course’ G. Holmes (Eds) Integrating Learning Technology into the Curriculum Computers in Teaching Initiative Oxford 13–17
C. Steeples C. Jones (Eds) (2002) Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues Springer London
K. Swan (2001) ArticleTitle‘Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online course’ Distance Education 22 IssueID2 306–331
H. Tait N. Entwistle (1996) ArticleTitle‘Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies’ Higher Education 31 97–116 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00129109
E. Zhu (1998) ‘Learning and mentoring: Electronic discussion in a distance learning course’ C. Bonk K. King (Eds) Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship and Discourse Erlbaum Mahwah, New Jersey 233–259
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M. et al. Networked Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Expectations and Experiences. High Educ 50, 473–508 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6364-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6364-y