Abstract
“Follow the science” was commonly repeated during debates on COVID-19-related policy. The phrase “follow the science” raises questions that are central to our theories of knowledge and the application of scientific knowledge to maximize the wellbeing of our society. The purpose of this study was to (1) perform a scoping review of literature discussing “follow the science” and COVID-19, and (2) consider “follow the science” in the context of pediatric health. A comprehensive search of 14 databases was performed on May 23, 2023. Articles were included if they used terms such as “follow the science”, “follow the scientists”, “listen to science” or “listen to scientists”, and discussed COVID-19. There were 24 articles included in the final review. Existing literature on “follow the science” (1) differentiates between scientific knowledge and policy decisions; (2) emphasizes the importance of social sciences in policy making; (3) calls for more transparency in the knowledge synthesis and policy generating process; and (4) finds that scientific advisors see their role as advising on science rather than policy decision making. There was no definitional, epistemological, or philosophical intellectual defense of “follow the science” in the peer reviewed literature. Policy requires (1) reliable data and (2) agreement on what to do considering those empirical facts by appealing to values, ethics, morality, and law. A review of school shutdowns is used as an example of the inadequacy of “follow the science” as a guiding principle for public policy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Academy of Social Sciences. (2023). What is social science? Retrieved July 8, 2023, from https://acss.org.uk/what-is-social-science/
Are governments following the science on covid-19? (2020). The Economist. Retrieved September 1, 2022, from https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/11/11/are-governments-following-the-science-on-covid-19
Atkinson, P., Gobat, N., Lant, S., et al. (2021a). Understanding the policy dynamics of COVID-19 in the UK: Early findings from interviews with policy makers and health care professionals. Social Science and Medicine, 266, 113423.
Atkinson, S., Bradby, H., Bondio, M. G., et al. (2021b). Seeing the value of experiential knowledge through COVID-19. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43, 85.
Atkinson, P., Mableson, H., Sheard, S., et al. (2022). How did UK policy making in the COVID-19 response use science? Evidence from scientific advisors. Evidence and Policy, 18(4), 633–650.
Bennett, M. (2020). Should I Do as I'm Told? Trust, Experts, and COVID-19. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. https://kiej.georgetown.edu/trust-experts-and-covid-19-special-issue/
Betthauser, B. A., Bach-Mortensen, A. M., & Engzell, P . (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence eon learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behavior, 7(3), 375–385.
Bonger, A. (2022). What expertise does politics need in times of crisis? Notes on the current situation in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–6.
Bozeman, B. (2022). Use of science in public policy: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic efforts to ‘Follow the Science.’ Science and Public Policy, 49(5), 806–817.
de Campos-Rudinsky, T. C., & Undurraga, E. (2021). Public health decisions in the COVID-19 pandemic require more than ‘follow the science’. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47, 296–299.
Clarke, J. (2021). Following the science? Covid-19, ‘race’ and the politics of knowing. Cultural Studies, 35(2–3), 248–256.
Colman, E., Wanat, M., Goossens, H., Tonkin-Crine, S., & Anthierens, S. (2021). Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative interview study in five European countries. BMJ Global Health, 6, e006928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006928
Cooper, H., Nye, B., Charlton, K., Lindsay, J., & Greathouse, S. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 227–268.
COVID-19 Forecasting Team. (2022). Variation in the COVID-19 infection-fatality ratio by age, time, and geography during the pre-vaccine era: A systematic analysis. Lancet, 399(10334), 1469–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02867-1
Del Ratzsch. (2000). Science and its limits: The natural sciences in Christian perspective (2nd ed.). Westmont, IL: IVP Academic.
Dictionary.com. (2022). Reason. Retrieved September 1, 2022, from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reason
Dictionary.com. (2022). Science. Retrieved September 1, 2022, from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/science
Gilsbach, S., & Herpertz-Dahlmann, B. (2023). “What made my eating disorder worse?” The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Nutrients, 15(5), 1242.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2021). Theory and reality (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gordon, J. S. (2022). A COVID plea to the CDC: Follow the science, respect the people. Integrative Medicine, 21(2), 28–29.
Green, M. (2022). Chapter 6: The complexities of sustainability. In Following the science: The UK Government’s response to “herd immunity” during early COVID-19 (pp. 155–192). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
Heinsch, M., Cootes, H., & Tickner, C. (2023). Another implementation science is possible: engaging an 'intelligent public' in knowledge transition. Health Sociology Review, 32(1), 5–18.
Ichino, A., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2004). The long-run educational cost of World War II. Journal of Japan Water Works Association, 22, 57–87.
Jaume, D., & Willén, A. (2019). The long-run effects of teacher strikes: Evidence from Argentina. Journal of Japan Water Works Association, 37, 1097–1139.
Koch, N., & Durodie, B. (2022). Scientists advise, ministers decide? The role of scientific expertise in UK policymaking during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Risk Research, 25(10), 1213–1222.
Krohnert, K., Haslam, A., Hoeg, T. B., & Prasad, V. (2023). Statistical and Numerical Errors Made by the US Centers for Disease Control and PRevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic. SSRN Retrieved Februrary 29, 2024, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4381627
Kurzer, P., & Orston, D. (2023). Follow the science: The European public health community confronts the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. European Policy Analysis, 9, 101–118.
Lee, D. M. (2020). Covid-19: Agnotology, inequality, and leadership. Human Resource Development International 4, 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1779544
Lohse, S., & Stefano, C. (2021). Follow *the* science? On the marginal role of the social sciences in the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 11(4), 99.
McKee, M. (2022). If we are no longer “following the science”, what are we following? BMJ, 377, o930. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o930
Mercuri, M. (2020). Just follow the science: A government response to a pandemic. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(6), 1576–1577.
Mormina, M. (2022). Knowledge, expertise and science advice during COVID-19. In search of epistemic justice for the ‘Wicked’ problems of post-normal times. Social Epistemology, 36(4), 671–685.
Murray, G. R., & Murray, S. M. (2023). Following the Science? Examining the issuance of stay-at-home orders related to COVID-19 by U.S. Governors. American Politics Research, 51(2), 147–160.
O’Donnel, G., & Begg, H. (2020). Far from well: The UK since COVID-19, and learning to follow the science(s). Fiscal Studies, 41(4), 761–804.
Prasad, V. (2021). At a time when the U.S. needed Covid-19 dialogue between scientists, Francis Collins moved to shut it down. STAT. Retrieved July 8, 2023, from https://www.statnews.com/2021/12/23/at-a-time-when-the-u-s-needed-covid-19-dialogue-between-scientists-francis-collins-moved-to-shut-it-down/
Safford, T. G., Whitmore, E. H., & Hamilton, L. C. (2021). Follow the scientists? How beliefs about the practice of science shaped COVID-19 views. Journal of Science Communication, 20(7), A03.
“Science and pseudo-science” Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. (2008). Last updated May 20, 2021. Retrieved September 1, 2022, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/
Shear, M. D., & Mueller, B. (2022, September 1). Biden promised to follow the science. But sometimes, he gets ahead of the experts. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/24/us/politics/biden-science-boosters-vaccine.html
Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction into science and technology studies (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Smitherman, L. C., Golden, W. C., & Walton, J. R. (2021). Health disparities and their effects on children and their caregivers during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 68(5), 1133–1145.
Tollefson, J., Kozlov, M., Maxmen, A., & Witze, A. (2022). Has Biden followed the science? What researchers say. Nature, 601(7894), 491–493. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00108-4
Trotter, G. (2021). COVID-19 and the authority of science. HEC Forum, 35(2), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09455-7
Varma, J. (2020) “Not Every Question Has a Scientific Answer”. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/09/following-the-science-democracy-experts-covid-19/620138/
Viner, R., Russell, S., & Saulle, R. (2022). School closures during social lockdown and mental health, health behaviors, and well-being among children and adolescents during the first COVID-19 wave. A systematic review. JAMA Pediatrics, 176(4), 400–409.
Woolf, S. H., Chapman, D. A., & Hyung Lee, J. (2021). COVID-19 as the leading cause of death in the United States. JAMA, 325(2), 123–124.
Zacharias, J., & Joffe, M. (2020). Pandeic communications: follow the science but lead with psychology. BMJ, 371, m4647.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Leslie Hassett, M.L.S., for her generous and expert assistance in executing the scoping review described in this article.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics Approval
Ethics approval not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Greenmyer, J.R. “Follow the Science” in COVID-19 Policy: A Scoping Review. HEC Forum (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-024-09521-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-024-09521-w