Advertisement

HEC Forum

pp 1–14 | Cite as

Why Tolerate Conscientious Objections in Medicine

  • Thomas D. HarterEmail author
Article
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Most arguments about conscientious objections in medicine fail to capture the full scope and complexity of the concept before drawing conclusions about their permissibility in practice. Arguments favoring and disfavoring the accommodation of conscientious objections in practice tend to focus too narrowly on prima facie morally contentious treatments and religious claims of conscience, while further failing to address the possibility of moral perspectives changing over time. In this paper, I argue that standard reasons against permitting conscientious objections in practice—that their permission may result in harm to patients, the idea that medical providers willingly enter into the medical field, and that conscientious objections stand contrary to medical professionalism—do not apply in all cases and that the medical field and health systems in which many physicians now practice should continue to tolerate conscientious objections in practice.

Keywords

Conscientious objection Religion and medicine Liberalism Harm 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Tyler Whatley, MTS, of Divine Savior Healthcare and Sarah Brown, MD, of Gundersen Health System for their helpful thoughts and comments on the ideas presented in this paper, particularly regarding some of the case examples.

References

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2018). Frequently asked questions: Labor, delivery, and postpartum care faq006. Cesarean Birth. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. https://www.acog.org/Patients/FAQs/Cesarean-Birth#can. Accessed 22 Feb 2019.
  2. American Medical Association. (2017). Code of medical ethics of the American Medical Association. Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  3. Baker K R. (2018). Refusal to fill prescriptions under conscience clauses. Drug topics. Modern Medicine Network. https://www.drugtopics.com/legal-news/refusal-fill-prescriptions-under-conscience-clauses. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.
  4. Blackshaw, B. P. (2019). No conscientious objection without normative justification: A reply. Bioethics, 33(4), 522.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, B., Brockman, M., Garrett, J., Knackstedt, A., & Lantos, J. (2018). Why are there so few ethics consults in children’s hospitals? HEC Forum, 30(1), 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., Boudreau, J. D., Snell, L., & Steinert, Y. (2015). A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: A guide for medical educators. Academic Medicine, 90(6), 718–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grisaru, S., & Samueloff, A. (2004). Primary nonmedically indicated cesarean section (“section on request”): Evidence based or modern vogue. Clinics in Perinatology, 31(3), 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harter, T. D. (2015). Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: An argument for public disclosure. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levinson, W., Ginsburg, S., Hafferty, F. W., & Lucey, C. R. (2014). Understanding medical professionalism. New York: McGraw Hill Education.Google Scholar
  10. Lyus, R. J. (2017). Response to: ‘Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies’ by Schuklenk and Smalling. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(4), 250–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morris, B. J., Kennedy, S. E., Wodak, A. D., Mindel, A., Golovsky, D., Schrieber, L., et al. (2017). Early infant male circumcision: Systematic review, risk-benefit analysis, and progress in policy. World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, 6(1), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neil Noesen v. State of Wisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing Pharmacy Examining Board, 2008 WI App 52 (Wis. App. 3d 2008).Google Scholar
  13. Porter, S. (2012). 52,000 more primary care physicians needed by 2025: Trifecta of circumstances drive shortage. News document. American Academy of Family Physicians. https://www.aafp.org/news/practice-professional-issues/20121114workforceneeds.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.
  14. Schuklenk, U. (2018). Conscientious objection in medicine: Accommodation versus professionalism and the public good. British Medical Bulletin, 126(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schuklenk, U., & Smalling, R. (2017). Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(4), 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sulmasy, D. P. (2008). What is conscience and why is respect for it so important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 29(3), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Walker, M. U. (1993). Keeping moral space open: New images of ethics consulting. Hastings Center Report, 23(2), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. White, D. B., & Brody, B. (2011). Would accommodating some conscientious objections by physicians promote quality in medical care? Journal of the American Medical Association, 305(17), 1804–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wicclair, M. R. (2007). The moral significance of claims of conscience in healthcare. American Journal of Bioethics, 7(12), 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zolf, B. (2018). No conscientious objection without normative justification: Against conscientious objection in medicine. Bioethics, 33(1), 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Bioethics and HumanitiesGundersen Health SystemLa CrosseUSA

Personalised recommendations