Skip to main content

Models of Ethics Consultation Used by Canadian Ethics Consultants: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

This article describes a qualitative study of models of ethics consultation used by ethics consultants in Canada. We found four different models used by Canadian ethics consultants whom we interviewed, and one sub-variant. We describe (1) the lone ethics consultant model, (1a) the hub-and-spokes sub-variant of this model; (2) the ethics committee model; (3) the capacity-building model; and (4) the facilitated model. Previous empirical studies of ethics consultation describe only two or three of these models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. The requirement to protect participant confidentiality entails that we cannot identify which provinces.

References

  • Bean, S. (2011). Navigating the murky intersection between clinical and organizational ethics: A hybrid case taxonomy. Bioethics, 25(6), 320–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Berkowitz, K.A., Chanko, B.L., & Powell, T. (2006). Ethics consultation: Responding to ethics questions in health care. http://www.ethics.va.gov/ECprimer.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2015.

  • Fox, E., Myers, S., & Pearlman, R. A. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: A national survey. The American Journal of Bioethics, 7(2), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudine, A., Lamb, M., LeFort, S. M., & Thorne, L. (2011). The functioning of hospital ethics committees: A multiple-case study of four Canadian committees. HEC Forum, 23(3), 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godkin, M. D., Faith, K., Upshur, R. E. G., MacRae, S. K., & Tracy, C. S. (2005). Project examining effectiveness in clinical ethics (PEECE): Phase 1—descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(9), 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, R. A., Anstey, K. W., Macri, R., Heesters, A., Bean, S., & Zlotnik Shaul, R. (2014). Bioethics consultation practices and procedures: A survey of a large Canadian community of practice. HEC Forum, 26(2), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. R., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (2010). Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine (7th ed.). Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, S., Chidwick, P., Berry, S., Secker, B., Hébert, P., Zlotnik Shaul, R., et al. (2005). Clinical bioethics integration, sustainability, and accountability: The Hub and Spokes strategy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(5), 256–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M. (1998). Organizational and administrative ethics in health care: An ethics gap. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 3(3), http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol31998/No3Dec1998/EthicsGap.html. Accessed 2 July 2015.

  • Silva, D. S., Gibson, J. L., Sibbald, R., Connolly, E., & Singer, P. A. (2008). Clinical ethicists’ perspectives on organisational ethics in healthcare organisations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(5), 320–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarzian, A. J., & ASBH Core Competencies Update Task Force (2013). Health care ethics consultation: An update on core competencies and emerging standards from the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities’ Core Competencies Update Task Force. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(2), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulsky, J. A., & Fox, E. (1996). Evaluating ethics consultation: Framing the questions. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 7(2), 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Kaposy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaposy, C., Brunger, F., Maddalena, V. et al. Models of Ethics Consultation Used by Canadian Ethics Consultants: A Qualitative Study. HEC Forum 28, 273–282 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-015-9299-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-015-9299-z

Keywords