With disagreement, doubts, or ambiguous grounds in end–of-life decisions, doctors are advised to involve a clinical ethics committee (CEC). However, little has been published on doctors’ experiences with discussing an end-of-life decision in a CEC. As part of the quality assurance of this work, we wanted to find out if clinicians have benefited from discussing end-of-life decisions in CECs and why. We will disseminate some Norwegian doctors’ experiences when discussing end-of-life decisions in CECs, based on semi-structured interviews with fifteen Norwegian physicians who had brought an end-of-life decision case to a CEC. Almost half of the cases involved conflicts with the patients’ relatives. In a majority of the cases, there was uncertainty about what would be the ethically preferable solution. Reasons for referring the case to the CEC were to get broader illumination of the case, to get perspective from people outside the team, to get advice, or to get moral backing on a decision already made. A great majority of the clinicians reported an overall positive experience with the CECs’ discussions. In cases where there was conflict, the clinicians reported less satisfaction with the CECs’ discussions. The study shows that most doctors who have used a CEC in an end-of-life decision find it useful to have ethical and/or legal aspects illuminated, and to have the dilemma scrutinized from a new perspective. A systematic discussion seems to be significant to the clinicians.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Report IS-2091. https://helsedirektoratet.no/Lists/Publikasjoner/Attachments/67/IS-2091-Beslutningsprosesser-ved-begrensning-av-livsforlengende-behandling.pdf (only in Norwegian).
TBERG-2006-665 (court of first instance) and LG-2007-100482 (court of appeal).
Manual for working in a Clinical Ethics Committee in secondary health services: http://www.med.uio.no/helsam/tjenester/kunnskap/etikk-helsetjenesten/manualer/manual_rev2015.pdf.
Agich, G. J. (2013). Education and the improvement of clinical ethics services. BMC Medical Education, 13, 41.
Bahus, M. K. (2013). Legers rettsanvendelse ved liv/død-beslutninger. Retfærd, 140, 46–68.
Bahus, M. K. (2014). Beslutningsprosessen ved liv/død-avgjørelser En empirisk studie av et utvalg av norske legers handlingsvalg ved beslutninger om livsforlengende behandling skal gis eller ikke gis til alvorlig syke og døende pasienter (Akademika Forlag).
Brierley, J., Linthicum, J. F., & Petros, A. (2013). Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children? Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(9), 573–577.
Dörries, A., Boitte, P., Borovecki, A., Cobbaut, J. P., Reiter-Theil, S., & Slowther, A. M. (2011). Institutional challenges for clinical ethics committees. Paris: HEC Forum.
DuVal, G., Sartorius, L. F., Clarridge, B. F., Gensler, G. F., & Danis, M. (2001). What triggers requests for ethics consultations? Journal of Medical Ethics, 27, i24–i29.
Førde, R. (2008). Doctors and clinical ethics committees: Friends or foes? Bioethica Forum, 1, 45–50.
Førde, R., & Hansen, T. W. R. (2009). Involving patients and relatives in a Norwegian clinical ethics committee: What have we learned? Clinical Ethics, 4(3), 125–130.
Førde, R., & Linja, T. (2015). “It scares me to know that we might not have been there!”: A qualitative study into the experiences of parents of seriously ill children participating in ethical case discussions. BMC Medical Ethics, 16, 40.
Førde, R., & Vandvik, I. H. (2005). Clinical ethics, information, and communication: Review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 73–77.
Gacki-Smith, J., & Gordon, E. J. (2005). Residents’ access to ethics consultations: Knowledge, use, and perceptions. Academic Medicine, 80, 168.
Hamric, A. B., & Blackhall, L. J. (2007). Nurse-physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: Collaboration, moral distress, and ethical climate. Critical Care Medicine, 35, 422–429.
Hurst, S. A., Perrier, A. F., Pegoraro, R. F., Reiter-Theil, S., Førde, R., Slowther, A. M., et al. (2007a). Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: Experiences of European doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 51–57.
Hurst, S. A., Reiter-Theil, S., Perrier, A., Perrier, A. F., Førde, R., Slowther, A. M., et al. (2007b). Physicians’ access to ethics support services in four European countries. Health Care Analysis, 15, 321.
Jansky, M., Marx, G., Nauck, F., & Alt-Epping, B. (2013). Physicians’ and nurses’ expectations and objections toward a clinical ethics committee. Nursing Ethics, 20, 771–783.
Kalager, G., Førde, R., & Pedersen, R. (2011). Is the discussion of patient cases in clinical ethics-committees useful? Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, 131(2), 118–121.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterView Introduktion til et håndværk (2nd ed.). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Marcus, B. S., Shank, G. F., Carlson, J. N., & Venkat, A. (2015). Qualitative analysis of healthcare professionals’ viewpoints on the role of ethics committees and hospitals in the resolution of clinical ethical dilemmas. HEC Forum, 27, 11–34.
Mickelsen, R. A., Bernstein, D. S., Marshall, M. F., & Miles, S. H. (2013). The Barnes case: Taking difficult futility cases public. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41, 374–378.
Pfäfflin, M. F., Kobert, K. F., & Reiter-Theil, S. (2009). Evaluating clinical ethics consultation: A European perspective. Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics, 18, 406–419.
Reiter-Theil, S. (2003). Balancing the perspectives. The patient's role in clinical ethics consultation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 6(3), 247–254.
Swetz, K. M., Crowley, M. E., Hook, C. C., & Mueller, P. S. (2007). Report of 255 clinical ethics consultations and review of the literature. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 82(6), 686–691.
Trotochaud, K., Coleman, J. R., Krawiecki, N., & McCracken, C. (2015). Moral distress in pediatric healthcare providers. Journal of Pediatric Nursing,. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2015.03.001.
Whitehead, P. B., Herbertson, R. K., Hamric, A. B., Epstein, E. G., & Fisher, J. M. (2015). Moral distress among healthcare professionals: Report of an institute-wide survey. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(2), 117–125.
We thank Kristin Weaver for her contribution and efficient work with the content. We also thank Attorney-at-Law Vegard Bahus (LL.M.) for valuable contributions to the discussion. The study was supported financially by South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (Health Care Trust), Eckbos Legater and Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo.
Conflict of interest
About this article
Cite this article
Bahus, M.K., Førde, R. Discussing End-of-Life Decisions in a Clinical Ethics Committee: An Interview Study of Norwegian Doctors’ Experience. HEC Forum 28, 261–272 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-015-9296-2
- Clinical Ethics Committee (CEC)
- End-of-life decisions