Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Errors and Omissions: Donor Compensation Policies and Richard Titmuss

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many global and national systems of regulation of blood donors and donor compensation rely for intellectual support on Richard Titmuss’s views, represented in The Gift Relationship. Based on selective interpretation of data from the 1960s, Titmuss engineered an ethical view pertaining to donors and, in so doing, created not only ongoing stereotypes, but created a cause for followers to perpetuate misunderstandings about the nature of such donations. In many cases, donors are, in fact compensated, but regulatory systems persevere in using definitional fig leaves in order to perpetuate an ongoing political goal of diminishing private sector participation in health care. However, in more recent works, including new views of critical sociology and evolutionary psychology, the Titmuss worldview has been turned upside-down. Evidence readily available today proves the safety of compensated donation and the lives saved by encouraging policies for both compensated and non-compensated donation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is still within the same United Kingdom which took Titmuss’s policy recommendations and thinking to heart, banning compensated blood and plasma donations, the end result of which is the large importation of plasma protein therapeutics due to the vCJD concern through the late 1990s. With Titmuss’s focus on blood donation binding people together in a sense of community, one could readily wonder what “binding” occurs when the exchange of such cells and tissues results in a member of that population.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Penrod.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Penrod, J., Farrugia, A. Errors and Omissions: Donor Compensation Policies and Richard Titmuss. HEC Forum 27, 319–330 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-015-9267-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-015-9267-7

Keywords

Navigation